In the long, quiet ledger of how democracies buy their own futures, a single rich man's checkbook has once again become a headline. Michael Bloomberg, the former New York mayor now in his eighties, has reportedly sent $80 million into Democratic midterm efforts over September and October, aimed chiefly at reclaiming a House that Republicans hold by the thinnest of margins. The same day, Donald Trump pledged $400 million of his own to help Republican candidates, and the two sums now stand facing one another like rival tides meeting in a narrow channel. Whether money can truly decide what voters
Bloomberg Pours $80m Into Democratic Midterms as Trump Commits $400m to Republicans
"He expects a result."
Mark
Eighty million dollars is a big number. Why does it matter so much here?
Mimi
Because Democrats have been trailing Republicans in fundraising, by their own admission. A donation of this size lands in a party that needs it, and it's aimed mostly at House races.
Mark
And the aim is more than just winning?
Mimi
Right. Howard Wolfson says the target is a majority beyond the 218 seats required. He drew a line between 221 and 230 and said that gap really matters.
Luke
Worth noting that this is the Times's reporting, relayed by other outlets. The $80m figure isn't something we've seen confirmed in filings.
Mark
What about the Republican side?
Mimi
Trump said he plans $400m in total, with $300m already out the door. Elon Musk has spent $366m on conservative groups and campaigns.
Luke
Those are different kinds of numbers, though. Trump's is a stated intention, and Musk's is money spent. They shouldn't be added up as if they were the same thing.
Mark
Does Bloomberg's money buy a result?
Mimi
Wolfson said Bloomberg believes resources matter and expects a result. But in 2020 he spent heavily on a presidential run and lost.
Luke
Right, and the reporting doesn't say how much of the $80m has been spent or what it's bought. That's unknown. Also, Democrats say they're favored in the House, but that's their own belief, and the Senate is described by analysts as a toss-up.
Der Puls
- Bloomberg's reported $80 million has landed in Democratic coffers at a moment when the party trails Republicans in fundraising.
- Trump has announced $400 million for Republican candidates, with $300 million already moving out the door.
- Elon Musk has poured $366 million into conservative groups and campaigns, widening the money gap around the midterms.
- Democrats aim for a House majority well beyond the 218 seats needed, believing the chamber is within reach.
- The Senate, where Democrats need four net seats, could tip either way, and the outcome hangs on the final weeks of spending.
In the long, quiet ledger of how democracies buy their own futures, a single rich man's checkbook has once again become a headline. Michael Bloomberg, the former New York mayor now in his eighties, has reportedly sent $80 million into Democratic midterm efforts over September and October, aimed chiefly at reclaiming a House that Republicans hold by the thinnest of margins. The same day, Donald Trump pledged $400 million of his own to help Republican candidates, and the two sums now stand facing one another like rival tides meeting in a narrow channel. Whether money can truly decide what voters choose is an old argument, but Bloomberg's advisers insist that resources still matter, and the coming weeks will test that belief.
Michael Bloomberg has reportedly put $80 million behind Democratic midterm efforts, with most of it flowing in September and October toward the fight to flip the US House. The New York Times, which first reported the figures, says his adviser Howard Wolfson wants a majority far larger than the 218 seats needed, because the difference between 221 and 230 really matters.
The money includes $24 million to Everytown for Gun Safety, which Bloomberg cofounded, and $16 million to the House Majority PAC linked to minority leader Hakeem Jeffries. Smaller sums backed Democratic Senate and gubernatorial candidates, including James Talarico in Texas and Kathy Hochul in New York.
The same day, Trump said he would spend $400 million to help Republicans, and $300 million of it is already out. Elon Musk has spent $366 million on conservative causes so far.
Democrats believe they are favored to win the House, though they trail in fundraising and see the Senate as a genuine toss-up. Control of either chamber would let them check Trump's agenda, and a Senate majority would let them block his judicial nominees. With the election weeks away, the question is whether Democratic money can close the gap.
Michael Bloomberg has put $80m into Democratic efforts for the midterm elections, according to US media reports published Tuesday. The money is a sizable boost for a party that has lately had trouble keeping pace in fundraising as it tries to win control of Congress.
The New York Times, which first reported the figures, says the contributions were made in September and October. Most of it is aimed at Democrats trying to flip the US House of Representatives, which Republicans hold by a historically small margin. Howard Wolfson, Bloomberg's political adviser, told the paper the goal is a Democratic majority larger than the 218 seats needed to take the chamber. "The difference between 221 and 230, in terms of the House majority, really matters," he said.
Bloomberg is 84 and one of the world's richest people. He served three terms as mayor of New York City, from 2002 to 2013, and was an independent while in office. He later registered as a Democrat. In the 2018 midterms, during Donald Trump's first term, he also spent $80m to help the party. In 2020 he ran a well-funded but unsuccessful campaign for the Democratic presidential nomination.
The Times lists several of this year's donations. Everytown for Gun Safety, a group Bloomberg cofounded that is spending on Democratic candidates for the House, received $24m. The House Majority Pac, which is connected to House minority leader Hakeem Jeffries, received $16m. He also gave $2.5m to a Super Pac backing James Talarico, the Democratic candidate in Texas's US Senate race. Other money went to a Super Pac supporting the re-election of New York governor Kathy Hochul and to the campaigns of several Democratic gubernatorial candidates.
The reports landed the same day Trump said he intends to spend a total of $400m to help Republican candidates, of which $300m has already been disbursed. Republicans are also getting help from Trump's ally Elon Musk, who has so far spent $366m on conservative groups and campaigns.
Democrats say they believe they are favored to win back the House, though they acknowledge trailing Republicans in fundraising. They also think they have a chance at the four seats they would need to net to retake the Senate, although analysts say that contest could go either way.
The stakes are practical. Control of either chamber would let Democrats block Trump's legislative agenda and investigate his administration more effectively. A Senate majority would also let them reject his nominees for the supreme court and other federal judgeships.
Asked how effective Bloomberg thought the money would be, Wolfson answered that he "is of the view that resources matter in campaigns," and added that the billionaire "expects a result." With the election weeks away, the question is whether Democratic money, Bloomberg's included, can close the gap with the Republican spending now behind Trump and Musk.
Bemerkenswerte Zitate
The difference between 221 and 230, in terms of the House majority, really matters.— Howard Wolfson, Bloomberg's political adviser, to the New York Times
He is of the view that resources matter in campaigns.— Howard Wolfson
Möchten Sie die ganze Geschichte?
Das Original lesen bei The Guardian ↗
Politics & Governance