In September 2021, President Biden extended the reach of federal authority into the private workplace, requiring businesses of significant size to vaccinate their workers or subject them to weekly testing — a policy touching more than 100 million Americans. The directive arrived not as finished law but as intention, with the Department of Labor still drafting its rule, leaving employers caught between a federal mandate not yet written and a state government vowing to resist it at every turn. In South Carolina, as elsewhere, the question was less about the science of vaccination than about the
Biden's vaccine mandate puts businesses in legal and operational crossfire
The biggest issue we have now is who do you follow.
So the mandate applies to all businesses, or just the big ones?
Just businesses with more than 100 employees. That sounds broad until you realize most American companies are smaller than that—about 53 percent of the workforce works for businesses under 100 people.
Right, so in Charleston County, you're talking about 1,500 businesses that are affected versus 70,300 with fewer than 50 employees. The mandate's actual footprint is much smaller than the headline suggests.
What about the businesses that do hit that threshold? Are they ready?
Not really. The Charleston Hospitality Group, which runs several restaurants with 400 to 500 employees, was still trying to figure out what to do. They needed the actual Department of Labor rule to be written first.
And that rule hadn't been released yet when this article was written. So businesses were being told to prepare for something that didn't officially exist yet.
What's the legal question here?
Whether the mandate violates constitutional rights and employee freedoms. A business lawyer said she expected lawsuits, though she also noted that OSHA has legal authority to issue Emergency Temporary Standards in times of grave danger.
But that authority itself might be challenged in court. The legal mechanism exists, but that doesn't mean courts will uphold it.
And then there's the state government fighting the federal government.
Exactly. Governor McMaster said he'd fight the mandate "to the gates of hell." Businesses are stuck in the middle, not knowing which authority to follow.
Which is the real operational problem. If the state sues and wins, the federal rule might be blocked. If the state loses, businesses have to comply. Until that's settled, they're in limbo.
So what did the businesses actually do?
Most waited. The Charleston Hospitality Group said they'd probably implement some kind of testing program, but they weren't mandating vaccines yet—even though most of their employees were already vaccinated anyway.
Der Puls
- President Biden's sweeping vaccine mandate — covering private employers with 100 or more workers — landed before the actual regulatory rule existed, forcing businesses to prepare for a law they could not yet read.
- South Carolina's governor responded with scorched-earth rhetoric, vowing to fight the federal government 'to the gates of hell,' turning a public health policy into a full-scale political confrontation.
- Mid-sized businesses like Charleston Hospitality Group, employing hundreds across multiple locations, faced the sharpest pressure — too large to be exempt, too under-resourced to easily comply, and caught between warring authorities.
- Legal challenges were widely anticipated, with attorneys flagging constitutional questions, employee exemption rights, and the untested limits of OSHA's Emergency Temporary Standards authority.
- A patchwork of compliance had already emerged across the region — major institutions like MUSC and Joint Base Charleston mandating vaccines while Boeing, Walmart, and school districts had not — leaving the landscape fractured and uncertain.
In September 2021, President Biden extended the reach of federal authority into the private workplace, requiring businesses of significant size to vaccinate their workers or subject them to weekly testing — a policy touching more than 100 million Americans. The directive arrived not as finished law but as intention, with the Department of Labor still drafting its rule, leaving employers caught between a federal mandate not yet written and a state government vowing to resist it at every turn. In South Carolina, as elsewhere, the question was less about the science of vaccination than about the older, unresolved tensions between federal power and local sovereignty, between public health and individual liberty. Businesses, neither the authors of this conflict nor its arbiters, were left to wait.
When President Biden announced in September 2021 that federal employees must be vaccinated and that private businesses with more than 100 workers would face a vaccine-or-testing requirement, the policy was framed as a turning point in the nation's pandemic response. Citing major corporations that had already acted — United Airlines, Disney, Tyson Foods — Biden directed the Department of Labor to formalize the rule. But the rule itself had not yet been written, and the gap between announcement and implementation became a source of deep confusion for employers.
The mandate's practical reach was more limited than its headlines suggested. More than half of American workers are employed by businesses with fewer than 100 people, and South Carolina's economy reflects that pattern closely. In Charleston County, while roughly 1,500 employers crossed the 100-employee threshold, more than 70,000 businesses operated well below it. Frank Knapp of the South Carolina Small Business Chamber of Commerce noted that most of his constituents would be unaffected — though the federal definition of 'small business' extends to 500 employees, creating its own layer of definitional confusion.
The burden fell hardest on mid-sized operations. The Charleston Hospitality Group, running five or six Lowcountry restaurants with 400 to 500 employees, found itself squarely in the mandate's crosshairs. Chief Marketing Officer J. Michael Walker described the administrative weight of enforcement and the impossibility of planning around a rule that hadn't been finalized. His central question was blunt: 'Who do you follow?' — a dilemma made sharper by conflicting local, state, and federal signals already circulating through the region.
South Carolina's political leadership offered no ambiguity about its position. Governor Henry McMaster declared the mandate an attack on capitalism and the Constitution, promising fierce resistance. That posture deepened the legal uncertainty businesses were already navigating. Attorney Amy Gaffney anticipated litigation over constitutional grounds and employee freedoms, while also noting that OSHA held legitimate authority to issue Emergency Temporary Standards in cases of grave workplace danger — meaning the courts, not the politicians, would likely have the final word.
Practical complications multiplied. Employers would need to track vaccination records, provide paid leave for vaccine appointments, and potentially manage testing programs — all while the question of remote workers remained entirely unresolved. Across the Charleston area, the response was already uneven: MUSC, Joint Base Charleston, and city governments had moved forward with mandates, while Boeing, Walmart, school districts, and others had not. Businesses waited in a holding pattern, uncertain which authority would act first, and what compliance would ultimately require of them.
President Biden announced in September 2021 that all federal employees must be vaccinated against COVID-19, a directive affecting more than 100 million workers nationwide. Beyond the federal workforce, he instructed the Department of Labor to craft a rule requiring private businesses with more than 100 employees to mandate vaccination or implement weekly testing for unvaccinated staff. The policy was designed to increase vaccination rates across American workplaces and reduce disease transmission, with Biden citing major corporations—United Airlines, Disney, Tyson Foods, and Fox News—that had already adopted similar requirements.
The mandate's reach, however, was narrower than it first appeared. Across the nation, roughly 53 percent of the workforce is employed by businesses with fewer than 100 workers, and South Carolina's employment landscape mirrors this pattern. In Charleston County alone, approximately 1,500 employers exceed the 100-employee threshold, while more than 70,300 businesses operate with fewer than 50 workers. Frank Knapp, representing the South Carolina Small Business Chamber of Commerce, noted that most small businesses—defined by his organization as those under 100 employees—would escape the requirement entirely, though the federal government classifies small businesses as those under 500 employees.
The real pressure fell on mid-sized enterprises caught between the federal mandate and state opposition. The Charleston Hospitality Group, operating five or six restaurants across the Lowcountry with 400 to 500 employees, found itself in precisely this bind. Chief Marketing Officer J. Michael Walker explained the operational complexity: enforcing such a policy required substantial administrative resources, and the Department of Labor's final rule had not yet been released. "You have to have a lot of manpower to enforce this type of law," Walker said. "It's fine to come out with a mandate until you get to the nitty gritty of the law that comes from the Department of Labor." The company was weighing options but needed far more clarity before committing to a vaccination requirement.
South Carolina's political leadership made its position unmistakable. Governor Henry McMaster declared on social media that the federal government had "declared war against capitalism, thumbed their noses at the Constitution, and empowered our enemies abroad," vowing to "fight them to the gates of hell to protect the liberty and livelihood of every South Carolinian." This rhetorical escalation left businesses navigating a genuine legal and operational maze. Walker articulated the core dilemma: "The biggest issue we have now is who do you follow." He pointed to the confusion already created by conflicting local and state mandates, as well as school system policies. The uncertainty extended to enforcement—which agency would ultimately determine whether a business remained open or faced closure?
The Charleston Hospitality Group was not yet ready to mandate vaccinations, though Walker noted that most of their workforce was already vaccinated. Management met to explore alternatives, including whether they could implement testing programs themselves or require employees to arrange their own testing. Meanwhile, legal challenges appeared inevitable. Amy Gaffney, a business lawyer at the Gaffney Lewis law firm, anticipated litigation. She noted that employees could seek exemptions on religious or medical grounds, but South Carolina's right-to-work status offered little additional protection. "I do see cause for litigation where this rule is challenged," Gaffney said, pointing to questions about whether the mandate violated employee freedoms and constitutional rights.
Yet the federal government possessed legal standing for such mandates. OSHA, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, held authority to issue Emergency Temporary Standards—regulations that could be enacted when grave danger to worker safety existed. Gaffney cautioned that regardless of the mandate's final form, it would impose substantial burdens on businesses. Beyond tracking vaccination status, employers would be required to provide paid time off for employees to receive vaccines. One significant unresolved question concerned remote workers: with so many employees working from home or in hybrid arrangements, it remained unclear whether the mandate would apply to them at all.
Some of the Charleston area's largest employers had already moved ahead. Joint Base Charleston, the cities of North Charleston and Charleston, Charleston County government, the Medical University of South Carolina, and Roper St. Francis Healthcare had all implemented vaccine mandates. Others—including the Charleston County School District, Berkeley County School District, Dorchester District Two, Boeing, Trident Health, Walmart, and the U.S. Postal Service—had not yet done so as of mid-September. The patchwork of requirements, combined with the state's fierce opposition and the federal government's unfinished regulatory work, left businesses in a holding pattern, waiting to see which authority would enforce what, and when.
Bemerkenswerte Zitate
You have to have a lot of manpower to enforce this type of law. It's fine to come out with a mandate until you get to the nitty gritty of the law that comes from the Department of Labor.— J. Michael Walker, Chief Marketing Officer, Charleston Hospitality Group
I do see cause for litigation where this rule is challenged. I think there continues to be questions about where this violates an employees' freedoms and whether it violates their constitutional rights.— Amy Gaffney, business lawyer, Gaffney Lewis law firm