Bessent Urges Clear-Eyed US-China AI Talks Ahead of Shenzhen Meeting and Trump-Xi Summit

No illusions about the differences between the United States and China
Bessent framed AI cooperation with Beijing as coexisting with open competition ahead of the Shenzhen meeting.
Mark

Why does this speech matter beyond the usual pre-summit positioning?

Mimi

Because it puts AI risk on the formal diplomatic agenda. Bessent described a dialogue on superintelligence, pre-release testing of models, and keeping human judgment in command.

Mark

And there's something concrete already agreed?

Mimi

A direct channel for alerting each other to serious incidents. Trump and Xi settled on it in September at the White House.

Luke

Worth noting what we don't know. Bessent said the channel was agreed, but the reporting doesn't say how it works, who staffs it, or what counts as serious.

Mark

Trump also voiced reluctance about guardrails then, right?

Mimi

Yes, he said he wanted to preserve US leadership. Bessent's line about reconciling competition with the responsibilities of leadership reads against that.

Luke

Right, but that's reading, not reporting. The source doesn't say the two are linked, only that both happened.

Mark

What about the trade pieces?

Mimi

A Board of Trade covering mutual tariff cuts on $30 billion of non-sensitive goods each way, and a proposed Board of Investment for market access.

Luke

And the Board of Investment is still a plan. No results are reported for either board yet, and the farm purchases are pledges, not confirmed deliveries.

Mark

What should we watch?

Mimi

Shenzhen next week, then a possible fourth summit in Miami in December.

  • Washington and Beijing are racing toward superintelligence while openly admitting they do not share its values or its assumptions.
  • A direct alert channel for AI incidents, agreed in September, sits uneasily beside Trump's reluctance to accept guardrails that might slow American leadership.
  • Bessent is carrying a new superintelligence dialogue to Shenzhen, aiming to trade testing practices and keep human judgment in command.
  • Friction over the trade deficit, Nvidia's spying accusations, and Beijing's denials threaten to crowd the agenda before it can gain momentum.
  • Trade boards on tariffs and investment are being built as stabilizers, with a possible fourth Trump-Xi summit in Miami in December as the next test.

In New York this week, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent asked his countrymen to look at the rival power across the Pacific without illusion: Washington and Beijing diverge deeply on artificial intelligence, yet they have little choice but to cooperate against its dangers while racing to lead it. The story belongs to a familiar human pattern, in which great powers pair a grudging handshake with a sharpened rivalry, and here the handshake takes the form of a planned dialogue on superintelligence, testing standards, and human control. Its next chapter unfolds in Shenzhen next week, on the margins of the Asia-Pacific summit, where the promise of a direct channel for alerting each other to serious AI incidents will be tested against the older instinct to protect a lead.

In New York, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told the National Committee on US-China Relations that Washington and Beijing should hold no illusions about how far apart they stand on artificial intelligence. They can work together to reduce its dangers, he argued, while still competing to lead it.

Next week Bessent travels to Shenzhen for a meeting between Trump and Xi Jinping on the sidelines of the APEC summit. The centerpiece is a new bilateral dialogue on superintelligence, which the administration prefers to call the technology. It aims to guard against shared risks, exchange practices for testing advanced models before release, and keep human judgment firmly in command. The two sides had already agreed in September on a direct channel for alerting each other to serious incidents, though Trump was reluctant to add guardrails that might limit American leadership.

The story also carries shadows. Beijing calls spying accusations tied to Nvidia groundless, and the company says its board sees no sign that security or secrets were compromised. Its chief executive, Jensen Huang, has committed to an internal review and has admitted, without detail, to infidelity toward his wife. It remains unclear whether he will join Trump at APEC.

On trade, Bessent recalled the 1784 voyage that exchanged American ginseng for Chinese tea, porcelain and silk. He pointed to a Board of Trade set to determine mutual tariff cuts on $30 billion of non-sensitive goods, Chinese pledges to buy American farm products, and a planned Board of Investment. The trade deficit remains a point of friction, but the American aim, he said, is to de-risk rather than decouple. The next markers are Shenzhen and, expected in December, a fourth Trump-Xi summit at the US-hosted G20 in Miami.

On Tuesday in New York, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent stood before the National Committee on US-China Relations and delivered a message built around restraint: Washington and Beijing, he said, should hold no illusions about how far apart they are on artificial intelligence, even as they work together to reduce its dangers and compete to lead it.

Bessent will travel to China next week for what will be President Donald Trump's third meeting this year with Chinese President Xi Jinping. The gathering, in Shenzhen, will take place on the sidelines of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation leaders summit on November 18-19. In his prepared remarks, Bessent said he wanted to build a constructive relationship on the basis of balance and reciprocity.

The Shenzhen meeting, he said, will advance a new bilateral dialogue on what he called superintelligence, or SI, the Trump administration's preferred term for the technology. The dialogue is meant to guard against shared risks and to prevent a misunderstanding between the two systems. Bessent said the sides also expect to trade best practices for evaluating and testing advanced models before release, and for keeping human judgment firmly in command. He added that the two countries had agreed to set up a direct channel for alerting each other to serious incidents.

That alert system was agreed by Trump and Xi when they met at the White House in September. At the time, though, Trump said he was reluctant to add new guardrails because he wanted to preserve US leadership, a tension that runs under Bessent's framing. As SI advances, he said, so will the need for new kinds of risk management, and for the two nations to show they can reconcile the demands of competition with the responsibilities of leadership. He then cautioned that US and Chinese interests will not always coincide, and that their approaches to any given challenge will not always converge.

The Reuters report also touches on questions surrounding Nvidia. China's foreign ministry has called spying accusations connected to the company groundless and a smear. Nvidia has said its board has no reason to believe US national security or company secrets were compromised, and that chief executive Jensen Huang has committed to cooperating with an internal review. Huang has told employees he was unfaithful to his wife but gave no details about the relationship. He attended the Trump-Xi summits in Beijing in May and Washington in September, but it is unclear whether Trump will bring him to APEC.

On trade, Bessent invoked the first American trading voyage to China in 1784, which exchanged American ginseng for Chinese tea, porcelain and silk. The relationship, he said, will be sustained by the wisdom and the will to recognize where common purpose must prevail over competing interests. He pointed to initiatives from the two earlier summits: a Board of Trade to determine mutual tariff cuts on $30 billion of non-sensitive goods in each direction, and Chinese pledges to buy US farm goods.

A similarly structured Board of Investment, he said, will give a forum to issues including market access for American companies in China and increased predictability for Chinese companies. He reiterated that the US trade deficit with China remains a source of friction, but said the US aim is to de-risk, not to decouple.

The next markers are the Shenzhen meeting next week and a fourth Trump-Xi summit expected in December at the US-hosted G20 in Miami.

The US aim is to de-risk, not to decouple from trade with China.
— Scott Bessent, US Treasury Secretary
Our interests will not always coincide, and our approach to every challenge will not always converge.
— Scott Bessent, US Treasury Secretary
Envie de l'histoire complète ? Lire l'original sur Reuters ↗
Nous contacter FAQ