In Minsk, a quiet diplomatic transaction unfolded between two governments long estranged: Belarus agreed to release 25 political prisoners, and Washington agreed to lift sanctions on two companies while unfreezing tens of millions in assets. The arrangement, brokered by a US envoy acting on behalf of President Trump, marks the first concrete thaw in a relationship frozen since Lukashenko's violent suppression of the 2020 protests. It is a modest exchange measured against the scale of what remains unresolved — hundreds of prisoners still detained, and a deeper reckoning between sovereignty and
Belarus to Release 25 Prisoners as US Eases Sanctions
25 prisoners to be released from detention; over 900 political prisoners reportedly remain imprisoned in Belarus.
We are not done—both sides committed to continuing talks
Mark
So this is a prisoner exchange, essentially? Twenty-five people walk free in exchange for the US lifting sanctions on two companies?
Mimi
It's framed as an interim agreement, which suggests it's the first move in a longer negotiation. The prisoner release and the sanctions relief are linked, yes, but there's also tens of millions in frozen assets being unfrozen. It's not a simple one-to-one trade.
Luke
But we should be clear about scale. Coale asked for 250 prisoners to be released last March. He got 25. That's a ten percent success rate on his initial request.
Mimi
True. And Lukashenko denied during the talks that political prisoners even exist in Belarus. So there's a fundamental disagreement about the facts on the ground.
Mark
What about the companies? Why those two specifically?
Mimi
Lakokraska makes industrial coatings. Bellesbumprom oversees forestry and paper. They're economically significant sectors, and the sanctions have been in place for years—one since 2008, the other since 2023. Removing them signals a real shift in US policy.
Luke
But we don't have details on how much economic impact that actually has, or whether these companies were the ones Lukashenko most wanted delisted. We're taking the agreement at face value.
Mark
And the human rights groups say over 900 political prisoners remain. So this deal frees 25 out of potentially more than 900?
Mimi
That's what Viasna claims. Lukashenko disputes the number entirely. The disagreement itself is part of the problem—they can't even agree on how many people are detained.
Luke
Exactly. We know 25 are being released. We know Viasna says 900-plus remain. We don't know if Viasna's count is accurate, and we don't have independent verification of either number.
Mark
So what happens next?
Mimi
Both sides say they're committed to further negotiations. More prisoner releases, more sanctions relief. But the interim language suggests this is just the opening move.
Luke
And whether those further negotiations actually happen, or whether they stall out like the March request did, that's the real story we'll be watching.
Der Puls
- After six years of sanctions and silence, a US envoy's visit to Minsk has produced the first tangible diplomatic movement between Washington and Lukashenko's government.
- The deal is narrow by design: 25 prisoners freed in exchange for sanctions relief on two companies and the unfreezing of tens of millions in Belarusian assets — a fraction of the 250 releases the US initially sought.
- Human rights organization Viasna insists more than 900 political prisoners remain behind bars, while Lukashenko denies any political prisoners exist in Belarus at all, leaving a vast factual chasm at the heart of the negotiations.
- Both sides have publicly committed to further talks, with the US envoy posting 'We are not done' — signaling that this agreement is framed as a beginning, not a resolution.
- For Belarus, sanctions relief offers economic oxygen; for Washington, the prisoner releases offer a diplomatic foothold — but the gap between what was asked and what was delivered reveals how far apart the two sides remain.
In Minsk, a quiet diplomatic transaction unfolded between two governments long estranged: Belarus agreed to release 25 political prisoners, and Washington agreed to lift sanctions on two companies while unfreezing tens of millions in assets. The arrangement, brokered by a US envoy acting on behalf of President Trump, marks the first concrete thaw in a relationship frozen since Lukashenko's violent suppression of the 2020 protests. It is a modest exchange measured against the scale of what remains unresolved — hundreds of prisoners still detained, and a deeper reckoning between sovereignty and accountability still deferred.
On a Wednesday in Minsk, US envoy John Coale announced that Belarus would release 25 prisoners under a negotiated interim agreement — the most concrete sign yet of a thaw between Washington and Lukashenko's government after years of frozen relations. Speaking on behalf of President Trump, Coale confirmed that the prisoner release would be matched by American concessions: sanctions lifted on two Belarusian companies and tens of millions in Belarusian assets unfrozen from US banks.
The estrangement between the two countries dates to 2020, when Lukashenko claimed victory in a disputed presidential election and his security forces crushed the protests that followed. The international condemnation that ensued triggered waves of US and European sanctions that have constrained Belarus's economy for six years. Coale had visited Minsk once before, in March, reportedly pressing for the release of 250 prisoners — a request that went unmet. The current agreement delivers 25, which Coale framed not as a disappointment but as a starting point.
The two companies removed from the US sanctions list are Lakokraska, an industrial paint manufacturer sanctioned since 2008, and Bellesbumprom, a state forestry and paper enterprise sanctioned in 2023. Their removal reopens pathways to international markets for both sectors.
The human rights dimension remains sharply contested. Viasna, the Belarusian rights organization now banned inside the country, counts more than 900 political prisoners still detained — held on charges ranging from extremism to insulting the president. Lukashenko, in his talks with Coale, denied that any political prisoners exist in Belarus at all.
Both sides have committed to further negotiations, and the envoy's public message was unambiguous: the talks are not finished. Yet the distance between 25 and 250, and between diplomatic progress and the hundreds of people Viasna says remain imprisoned, measures how much work the word 'interim' still carries.
In Minsk on Wednesday, a US envoy announced that Belarus would free 25 prisoners as part of a negotiated interim agreement aimed at thawing relations between Washington and Lukashenko's government. John Coale, speaking on behalf of President Donald Trump, told reporters that the prisoner release would be matched by American concessions: the lifting of sanctions on two Belarusian companies and the unfreezing of tens of millions of dollars in Belarusian assets held in US banks.
The deal represents a modest but concrete shift after years of escalating Western pressure. When Lukashenko claimed victory in the 2020 presidential election, massive protests erupted across the country. His security forces responded with a sweeping crackdown that drew international condemnation and triggered waves of sanctions from the United States and Europe. Those sanctions have remained in place for six years, constraining Belarus's economy and its ability to do business internationally.
Coale's visit to Minsk in September followed an earlier trip last March, when he had reportedly pressed Lukashenko to release 250 prisoners—a request that went unmet. The current agreement to free 25 represents a fraction of that initial ask, but Coale framed it as a beginning. On social media, he signaled that negotiations would continue, writing that both sides were committed to resolving outstanding disputes and securing the release of additional detainees alongside further sanctions relief. "We are not done," he posted.
The two companies being removed from the US sanctions list are Lakokraska, which manufactures industrial paints and coatings, and Bellesbumprom, a state-owned enterprise controlling Belarus's forestry, pulp, and paper industries. Sanctions on Lakokraska date to 2008; those on Bellesbumprom were imposed in 2023. Their removal opens pathways for these sectors to re-engage with international markets and suppliers.
The human rights picture remains contested. Viasna, a Belarusian human rights organization now banned in the country, maintains that the government holds more than 900 political prisoners. These detainees face charges ranging from extremism and conspiracy to seize power to incitement of hatred and insulting the president. During his talks with Coale, Lukashenko flatly denied that any political prisoners exist in Belarus at all, rejecting Viasna's accounting as false.
The agreement signals a willingness on both sides to move past the frozen hostility that has defined US-Belarus relations since 2020. For the Belarusian government, sanctions relief and access to frozen assets offer economic breathing room. For Washington, the prisoner releases and the prospect of further negotiations suggest a path toward normalized diplomatic engagement. Yet the gap between what Coale initially requested and what was actually delivered—25 prisoners instead of 250, and the acknowledgment that hundreds more remain detained—underscores how much distance still separates the two sides. The agreement is framed as interim, a first step, with both parties committed to continuing talks. What those talks will yield, and whether they will lead to the release of the hundreds of prisoners Viasna says remain in custody, remains to be seen.
Bemerkenswerte Zitate
We agreed on an interim agreement, and as a show of goodwill, Belarus will release 25 people. In exchange, the United States will lift sanctions on two companies.— John Coale, US envoy
We will continue to improve relations between the United States and Belarus and are working to secure the release of more people in the near future. We are not done!— John Coale, posted on social media
Möchten Sie die ganze Geschichte?
Das Original lesen bei Deutsche Welle ↗
Politics & Governance