In a South Yorkshire village, thirty-three nursery workers who had never struck before have stepped out with their banners, because the council they serve has chosen to hand their nurseries to private hands. It is an old story in new clothes: public care weighed against the public purse, and the people in the middle who know what a child needs when no one is watching. Whether the council's reasons of savings and legal duty will outweigh the workers' claim that some work cannot be priced by the hour is the question the coming weeks will answer.
Barnsley nursery workers strike over council plans to privatise six nurseries under Reform UK
Nursery staff report loss of pension entitlements and fear reduced care for vulnerable children, including families with special educational needs.
Every single member backed the walkout.
Mark
Why does a nursery strike in one village matter beyond Barnsley?
Mimi
It's a first test of how a Reform-run council handles service cuts. The workers link it to care home closures and social care cuts, though that's their reading of a pattern.
Luke
Fair, but "pattern" is the union's and some locals' view. The article confirms the closures, not that they share a single motive.
Mark
What are the staff actually afraid of losing?
Mimi
Pensions, and the time to do the extra work: food parcels, doctor visits, helping a family get a landlord to act.
Mark
And the council's case?
Mimi
No legal duty to run nurseries, lower cost to taxpayers, and the aim of protecting jobs and keeping services for families.
Luke
Note the pension dispute. The union says staff were told 36 hours before transfer. The council says it passed on legal advice quickly. Those timelines aren't reconciled here.
Mark
Is the staffing ratio claim solid?
Mimi
The figures are four children per worker in Barnsley and five in private settings, as the article puts it.
Luke
But whether private staff would be stretched in the way the workers fear is their prediction, not something shown yet.
Mark
What's still unknown?
Luke
Whether talks resolve the pensions, and what happens to the shuttered nursery after the private provider withdrew.
El Pulso
- Thirty-three GMB members at six Barnsley council nurseries have walked out for the first time in their working lives.
- Staff were told of pension losses just 36 hours before the transfer, and they say the reassurances they were given have collapsed.
- One nursery is already shut after a deregistered site was left without a private provider, leaving families scrambling.
- Council leader William Brown insists the move protects jobs and cuts council tax costs, while three strike days and ongoing talks with GMB try to settle the pension terms before the transfers proceed.
In a South Yorkshire village, thirty-three nursery workers who had never struck before have stepped out with their banners, because the council they serve has chosen to hand their nurseries to private hands. It is an old story in new clothes: public care weighed against the public purse, and the people in the middle who know what a child needs when no one is watching. Whether the council's reasons of savings and legal duty will outweigh the workers' claim that some work cannot be priced by the hour is the question the coming weeks will answer.
Outside a nursery in Grimethorpe, thirty-three women stand with banners while passing cars beep their horns. None of them had struck before. They work at six council nurseries in Barnsley, and they walked out after the Reform UK-led council agreed to transfer the nurseries to private companies. Their ballot was unanimous, and the GMB organiser Victoria Austin says the work these women do goes far beyond the job description.
Their objections are twofold: that the transfer will weaken care for vulnerable children, and that it will cost them their pensions. Staff say they learned of the pension impact only 36 hours before the transfer date, despite earlier reassurances from the previous Labour administration that pay and pensions would be protected. The process has also been bungled, with one nursery now closed after the council deregistered it before a private provider was secured, and that provider then withdrew.
The council argues it has no legal duty to run nurseries, that the change will ease the burden on council tax payers, and that it shared the pension advice as soon as legal guidance allowed. Leader William Brown says the decision was taken to protect jobs and keep services running, and that extra provision has been arranged for the strike days.
For staff at Darfield nursery, the stakes are personal. Their work often becomes a family's first point of contact: arranging food parcels, taking parents to the doctor, teaching a parent how to play with a child with disabilities, helping a three-year-old with special needs learn to walk, and pressing a landlord over a rat-infested home. They doubt private nurseries, which can assign five children per worker rather than four, would allow the same attention. Three strike days are planned, and the question now is whether talks with the union settle the pension terms before the transfers go ahead.
Outside a nursery in Grimethorpe, a South Yorkshire village, 33 women stand with banners while passing cars beep their horns. None of them has been on strike before. They work at six nurseries run by Barnsley council, and they have walked out because the council's Reform UK leadership agreed to transfer the nurseries to private companies.
The women are members of the GMB union, and the strength of their feeling shows in the ballot: turnout was 100%, with every member voting for action. Victoria Austin, a GMB regional organiser, said it was significant for low-paid working women to take a stand. She said the work the staff do goes above and beyond, and that the council should be "singing that from the rooftops".
Their objections are twofold. They say the transfer will hurt the services they give to vulnerable children, and that it will hurt their pensions. On the pensions, Austin said the council only told workers about the impact 36 hours before the transfer was due to happen. The plan itself began under the previous Labour administration, whose councillors had reassured staff that pay and benefits, pensions included, would stay the same. Reform took over the council at the May local elections, ending half a century of Labour leadership. Austin said the new leadership was "not interested" in the workers' fight and wanted to build a legacy around balancing the books.
Some local people see the transfer as part of a pattern of heavy-handed cuts by Reform councils, which in Barnsley has also meant closing care homes and cutting social care. Austin said an elected council's priority should be not letting children get left behind.
The union and workers also say the process has been bungled. One nursery is now shut: the council deregistered it with Ofsted so a private provider could register, but the provider then pulled out.
The council disputes the framing. It says councils have no legal duty to run nursery services, and that the change will reduce the amount of council tax payers' money needed to support them. It says that after legal advice that staff were no longer eligible for the local government pension scheme before the transfer, the information was shared quickly with staff and unions. Council leader William Brown said he was disappointed by the vote for strike action, and that the decision was taken to protect jobs and keep the services available to families. He said extra provision had been made for families on the three strike days and that the council was still talking to the union.
For four staff at Darfield nursery, Kimberley Darlington, Emma Jones, Lucy Kolconko and Charlotte Hawe, the dispute is about more than a lower-value pension. Hawe said staff are often a family's first point of contact, and that she has arranged many food parcels. Kolconko has taken families to see a doctor. Darlington described visiting a home to show a parent how to play with her children who have special educational needs and disabilities, because the parent did not know how.
The staff have also taught a three-year-old with special educational needs to walk, and helped another family, living with a rat infestation and mouldy walls, to get action from their landlord. They doubt they could do this in a private setting, where staff may carry more children. In Barnsley each worker looks after four children over the age of two; in private nurseries the figure can be five. Kolconko, a senior nursery worker, said there simply would not be time, adding that after all the work they had done, the council had turned on them.
Three strike days are planned. What to watch is whether the continuing talks between the council and GMB settle the pension question before the transfers go ahead.
Citas Notables
The decision to transfer these nurseries to another provider was taken to protect jobs and retain these services for families.— William Brown, leader of Barnsley council
We just won't have time to do these things. We've done all this work and the council has turned on us.— Lucy Kolconko, senior nursery worker
Quieres la nota completa?
Lee el original en The Guardian ↗
Politics & Governance