In the southeast corner of Iran, where the desert meets the borders of Pakistan and Afghanistan, an old grievance has found a sharper edge. Between late March and early October, armed attacks in Sistan and Baluchestan and neighboring Kerman rose in number and sophistication, leaving at least 94 dead, and the strain of a war with the United States and Israel now tests a state already accustomed to answering dissent with force. The story is less about a sudden rupture than about a long-standing marginalization meeting an opening that a weakened government may not be able to close quickly. Whethe
Baluch insurgency, Pakistan's balancing act and China's transactional ties test Iran's strained security reach
Every unit tied down in the southeast is one not available elsewhere
Sixty-three incidents in about six months. Is that the headline?
Partly. The harder detail is that the attacks are getting more complex: coordinated ambushes, roadside bombs, heavier weapons. And the groups merged in December 2025 into the People's Fighters Front.
And the front's goal has changed?
It now talks about ending Islamic Republic rule, not winning concessions for the Baluch.
Careful, though. That's how the front frames its aim. Whether anyone beyond the southeast shares it is, in the reporting's own words, unproven.
Why does the timing matter?
Iran's security forces are absorbing a war with the US and Israel. Bandoui argues a weakened state gives armed groups an opening they didn't have before.
That's one activist's reading. The count itself comes from HRANA, a rights group, and I'd want to know how incidents were verified. What the piece does say plainly is that there's no evidence the coalition can hold territory.
So why does it matter if it can't win?
Cost. Every unit tied down in the southeast is one not available against protests elsewhere.
That's a projection, an if-then. Nothing here shows forces have actually been moved.
And the grievances?
Poverty, tens of thousands without identity papers, fuel carrying across the border, Bloody Friday in 2022 with at least 87 killed.
El Pulso
- Sixty-three armed incidents in roughly four months have left at least 94 dead and 33 wounded across Sistan and Baluchestan and Kerman.
- Ambushes, roadside bombs and heavier weapons show attacks growing more coordinated, and the security forces are stretched thin by war.
- The People's Fighters Front, which includes the US- and Iran-designated Jaish al-Adl, now openly aims to topple the Islamic Republic rather than win concessions.
- Tehran must decide whether to divert units from the southeast at the cost of suppressing protests elsewhere, yet analysts see no sign the insurgency can hold territory.
In the southeast corner of Iran, where the desert meets the borders of Pakistan and Afghanistan, an old grievance has found a sharper edge. Between late March and early October, armed attacks in Sistan and Baluchestan and neighboring Kerman rose in number and sophistication, leaving at least 94 dead, and the strain of a war with the United States and Israel now tests a state already accustomed to answering dissent with force. The story is less about a sudden rupture than about a long-standing marginalization meeting an opening that a weakened government may not be able to close quickly. Whether this remains a regional problem or becomes a broader test of the Islamic Republic's reach will depend on choices made far from the province itself.
Between March 31 and October 10, the rights group HRANA recorded at least 63 armed incidents across Sistan and Baluchestan and neighboring Kerman. At least 94 people were killed and 33 injured. The attacks have grown more elaborate, with coordinated ambushes and roadside bombs now part of the pattern.
In December 2025, several Baluch armed groups merged into the People's Fighters Front, which includes Jaish al-Adl. Its aim has shifted from winning concessions for the Baluch to ending the Islamic Republic's rule. Whether that message can attract support beyond the southeast remains unproven.
The timing is significant. Iran's security services are absorbing the fallout of a war with the United States and Israel, while still serving as the forces the state relies on to suppress dissent. Rights activist Rahim Bandoui argues the conflict has deep roots in decades of repression, and that a government weakened by war now gives armed groups an opening they lacked before.
The grievances are old. Sistan and Baluchestan, home to a mostly Sunni Baluch population, is among Iran's poorest provinces. Tens of thousands of residents lack official identity documents, shutting them out of schools, clinics and legal rights. Many turn to dangerous work carrying fuel across the border, where they risk gunfire or fatal vehicle fires.
The province also carries the memory of Bloody Friday in Zahedan in 2022, when security forces killed at least 87 people, most of them Baluch worshippers. Baluch prisoners remain over-represented among those executed.
For now, the state retains the capacity to hold the southeast, and nothing suggests the insurgency can shift the balance alone. The larger question is whether a government that has long relied on lethal force can contain several challenges at once while war stretches its resources.
Between March 31 and October 10, the rights group HRANA documented at least 63 armed incidents across Sistan and Baluchestan and neighboring Kerman province. At least 94 people were killed and 33 injured. The attacks have become more elaborate as well as more frequent, with coordinated ambushes, roadside bombs and heavier weapons now part of the pattern.
In December 2025, several Baluch armed organizations merged into the People's Fighters Front. The coalition includes Jaish al-Adl, which both Iran and the United States designate as a terrorist organization. The front has increasingly described its aim as ending the Islamic Republic's rule, not extracting concessions for the Baluch. Whether that message can draw support outside the southeast has not been shown.
The timing matters. Iran's security services are dealing with the fallout of a war with the United States and Israel, and they are also the forces the state depends on to suppress dissent at home. Rahim Bandoui, an Iranian-Baluch rights activist and senior member of the Balochistan People's Party, told Iran International's Eye for Iran podcast that the conflict is not new. He traced it to decades of repression and argued that Tehran has long treated peaceful political activity and armed resistance in the province as one and the same threat. What has changed, he said, is that a government weakened by war gives armed groups an opening they lacked before.
If the attacks keep growing, Tehran will have to commit more personnel and resources to the southeast. Past unrest there was contained through military operations, mass arrests and lethal force. A sustained insurgency adds a cost on top of the war, and every unit held in Sistan and Baluchestan is unavailable against protests or other opposition elsewhere in the country.
The limits are real. There is no evidence the coalition can take and hold territory or threaten the central government's control. Across the border, Baluch armed groups in Pakistan differ considerably from their Iranian counterparts in ideology and aims, so a unified cross-border movement looks unlikely without substantial change on both sides.
The grievances underneath are old. Sistan and Baluchestan, home to a mostly Sunni Baluch population, is among Iran's poorest provinces despite its position on the Pakistani and Afghan borders and its natural resources. Residents describe discrimination, scarce jobs and poor access to schools and clinics. Sabah Baluch, a rights advocate with Iran House, told the podcast that tens of thousands of people in the province have no official identity documents, which shuts them out of basic services and legal rights. For some families, that has meant generations without formal schooling or work. Hardship pushes people into dangerous informal work, above all carrying fuel across the border, where they risk being shot by security forces or burned to death in vehicle fires.
The province has also seen some of the deadliest state violence against dissent. On September 30, 2022, during the protests that followed the death of Mahsa Amini, security forces killed at least 87 people in Zahedan, the provincial capital, most of them Baluch worshippers, in what became known as Bloody Friday. Baluch prisoners are also executed out of proportion to their numbers. Iran Human Rights recorded them as 20 percent of executions in 2023, 11 percent in 2024 and 9 percent in 2025.
For now, the Islamic Republic keeps the military and security capacity to hold the southeast, and nothing suggests the insurgency can shift the balance of power alone. The larger question is whether a state that has relied on lethal force for decades can contain several challenges at once while war makes new demands on the forces it uses. For Iran's wider opposition, the answer will matter well beyond the southeast.
Citas Notables
Tehran has long treated peaceful political activity and armed resistance in the province as the same security threat, and a war-weakened state gives armed groups an opening.— Rahim Bandoui, Balochistan People's Party, on Eye for Iran