In Singapore's Punggol district, a quiet revolution in transportation is being stewarded not by engineers in laboratories, but by safety drivers who sit beside machines learning to navigate the world. Sarah Ahmad and Sherman Seng represent a new kind of human role — neither fully in control nor fully passive — that challenges our assumptions about what it means to work alongside artificial intelligence. Their vigilance, feedback, and judgment are quietly shaping the autonomous vehicles of tomorrow, even as the long-term fate of their profession remains an open question. In this liminal moment
AV Safety Drivers Debunk 'Do Nothing' Myth as Singapore Expands Autonomous Trials
You have to be even more alert because you're not holding on
So these safety drivers—they're really not just sitting there watching the car drive itself?
Not at all. Sarah Ahmad describes it like being a driving instructor while the vehicle is the student. You're monitoring constantly, ready to take over if something goes wrong.
But what does "ready to take over" actually mean in practice? How often does that happen?
The source gives a few examples—a traffic marshal waving the car forward that the system couldn't interpret, animals crossing the road. It seems like it's not constant crisis management, but the alertness has to be there.
And they're trained for this? It's not just handing someone the keys?
Two different training models in the source. Ahmad had a month starting in November. Seng had a month in Singapore plus three weeks in Guangzhou where they deliberately put him in chaotic conditions—fast motorcycles, unexpected pedestrians.
The Guangzhou training sounds intense, but we don't know how representative that is. Is that standard for all safety drivers, or just Seng's experience?
The source only describes Seng's path in detail. We know Ahmad's was different—more focused on the left-hand drive operation and learning the system. So there's variation.
What happens to these jobs as the technology gets better?
Both drivers think there will be other roles—remote operators, fleet managers, trainers. The government even launched a transition program in July.
But that's optimistic speculation from the drivers themselves. The transport minister said the future role "depends on how the industry evolves." That's not a guarantee.
True. What we know for certain is that right now, in September 2026, these drivers are essential. Grab is expanding from 10 vehicles to 50 in the next six months. They need people.
And the regulatory environment—is that stable?
Parliament tabled a bill this month extending the sandbox through December 2028. So the trials have a clear runway, at least.
But that's still a defined endpoint. After 2028, what happens? The bill says they'll implement "more holistic legislation," but we don't know what that looks like.
Le Pouls
- Safety drivers in Singapore's AV trials face a persistent and dismissive misconception — that their job requires nothing more than sitting still — when in reality it demands a heightened, instructor-like alertness that exceeds ordinary driving.
- The training required to reach this state of readiness is grueling: one driver spent three weeks in Guangzhou being pushed to his limits by instructors simulating chaotic pedestrian and motorcycle encounters that Singapore's controlled roads could not replicate.
- On the ground, these drivers are active contributors — reporting harsh braking patterns, taking manual control when traffic marshals or wandering wildlife confound the system, and conducting familiarization runs so vehicles can learn new routes.
- The deeper tension is existential: as AV technology matures, the role that currently employs these drivers may dissolve, even as both drivers and government programs work to chart viable career pathways into remote operation, fleet management, and training.
- A parliamentary bill extending the AV regulatory sandbox through 2028 signals that this transitional period — and the human labor sustaining it — will persist longer than optimists might have predicted.
In Singapore's Punggol district, a quiet revolution in transportation is being stewarded not by engineers in laboratories, but by safety drivers who sit beside machines learning to navigate the world. Sarah Ahmad and Sherman Seng represent a new kind of human role — neither fully in control nor fully passive — that challenges our assumptions about what it means to work alongside artificial intelligence. Their vigilance, feedback, and judgment are quietly shaping the autonomous vehicles of tomorrow, even as the long-term fate of their profession remains an open question. In this liminal moment between human and machine agency, their work reminds us that technological transitions are rarely clean handoffs, but slow, collaborative negotiations.
Sarah Ahmad sits in the driver's seat of a vehicle that doesn't need her to drive it. Passengers climb in and ask the obvious question. The 45-year-old safety driver for Grab's autonomous vehicle trial in Punggol has heard the dismissal before — that her job is effortless, that anyone could do it, that she barely needs a licence. She disagrees firmly. "You have to be on higher alert as compared to when you are holding on to the steering wheel," she said. "It's as though you are a driving instructor, and the vehicle is the student."
Grab, partnered with Chinese firm WeRide, and ComfortDelGro, partnered with Pony.ai, have been running autonomous shuttle services in Punggol since April and June respectively. Ahmad came to the role after three years driving private-hire vehicles. When training began, the hardest part wasn't learning to operate a left-hand drive vehicle — it was learning to let go. "Suddenly, they said you cannot touch the steering wheel, just leave it alone, put your hands on your lap," she recalled. "When the car moves, I want to hold onto it; it's just a natural reaction."
Sherman Seng, 24, underwent even more intensive preparation — a month of training in Singapore followed by three weeks in Guangzhou, where instructors placed him in unpredictable scenarios with pedestrians and fast-approaching motorcycles. A typical workday for both drivers begins with sensor and camera checks, followed by manually driving the vehicle out of the parking area before engaging autonomous mode. Ahmad's feedback has already shaped the technology: after she reported that the AV braked too harshly near red lights, the system was adjusted. When situations exceed the vehicle's interpretation — a traffic marshal waving it through roadworks, or a chicken refusing to yield — the safety driver takes over.
The question hanging over the role is whether it will survive. Both drivers see pathways forward: Seng envisions remote operators and trainers; Ahmad believes safety drivers will remain essential as companies expand beyond Punggol to map new areas. The government has begun preparing for the transition, launching a manpower package in July that includes career conversion courses for roles as safety operators, remote operators, and fleet managers. William Tan, 42, already made that leap — moving from operations support to fleet manager at Zig Driverless, where he monitors vehicles, manages incidents, and feeds performance data back to engineers. A parliamentary bill proposes extending the AV regulatory sandbox through December 2028, ensuring the trials — and the human vigilance sustaining them — continue for years to come.
Sarah Ahmad sits in the driver's seat of a vehicle that does not need her to drive it. Passengers climb in, look around, and ask the obvious question: what exactly does she do? The 45-year-old safety driver for Grab's autonomous vehicle trial in Punggol has heard the dismissal before. "Your job is so simple, you just sit there and do nothing," people tell her. "Even retirees could do it. You don't even need a driving licence."
She pushes back firmly. The work demands the opposite of passivity. "You have to be on higher alert as compared to when you are holding on to the steering wheel, because now you're supervising the vehicle," Ahmad explained. "It's as though you are a driving instructor, and the vehicle is the student." Sherman Seng, a 24-year-old safety driver for ComfortDelGro's competing trial, echoed the point: "We have to maintain concentration almost all the time. The concentration part is there so that we are able to prevent unforeseeable events."
The two companies—Grab partnered with Chinese firm WeRide, ComfortDelGro with Pony.ai—have been running autonomous shuttle services in Punggol since April and June respectively. Both rely on safety drivers who are far more than passengers with a steering wheel. Ahmad came to the role after three years driving private-hire vehicles for Grab. When the company asked her to join the AV initiative last year, she accepted despite knowing little about autonomous vehicles in Singapore. Training began in November and forced her to unlearn instinct. Learning to operate a left-hand drive vehicle—the AVs are manufactured in China—was straightforward. The harder part came when instructors told her to let go entirely. "Suddenly, they said that you cannot touch the steering wheel, you just leave it alone, put your hands on your lap, and then that's it," she recalled. "When the car moves, I want to hold onto it; it's just a natural reaction."
Seng's preparation was more intensive. After a month of training in Singapore—split between manual and autonomous driving—he spent three weeks in Guangzhou, China, where the AV industry is more developed. "During my training in China, they actually pushed me to my limits," he said. Instructors placed him in unfamiliar conditions with pedestrians crossing unexpectedly and motorcycles approaching at high speed, testing reflexes and judgment in ways Singapore's controlled environment could not replicate.
A typical workday begins with vehicle inspection—checking that sensors and cameras are unobstructed and functioning. The driver then manually operates the vehicle to leave the parking area before engaging autonomous mode. Beyond passenger rides, safety drivers conduct familiarization runs so the vehicles can learn the Punggol area's patterns. Ahmad provides continuous feedback. Earlier this year, she noticed the AV braked too harshly when approaching red lights. She reported it, and the system was adjusted to travel slightly slower near traffic signals, reducing the jolt passengers felt. When the vehicle encounters situations it cannot interpret—a traffic marshal waving it forward past roadworks, for instance—the safety driver takes manual control. The vehicles have also stopped for squirrels, monitor lizards, and chickens. Seng described a standoff when a chicken crossed in front of his AV: "It is not willing to take the risk, so my AV actually waited for the chicken to cross the road."
The question hanging over the role is whether it will exist long-term. Then-Acting Transport Minister Jeffrey Siow acknowledged last year that safety drivers would be necessary in the short term, but their future role "depends on how the industry evolves." Both drivers see pathways forward. Seng believes the industry will create new positions—remote operators who control vehicles from company headquarters, team leaders, trainers. Ahmad argues that safety drivers will remain essential for years as the companies expand beyond Punggol to map new areas across Singapore. "We definitely need a lot of safety operators," she said. "It's very far into the future where it can be totally driverless all over the place."
The government has already begun preparing for transition. In July, the Ministry of Transport introduced a manpower transition package in partnership with the Manpower Ministry, the National Trades Union Congress, ComfortDelGro, and Grab. The program includes a career conversion course for AV specialists, training drivers for roles as safety operators, remote operators, and fleet managers. William Tan, 42, made that leap in October, moving from operations support to fleet manager at Zig Driverless. He monitors the AV fleet, communicates constantly with safety drivers, and manages incidents—he was present in January when an AV hit a road divider. He also feeds performance data back to Pony.ai, helping engineers refine the system. "The AV industry is growing very fast and very well," Tan said, "and there is a pipeline for safety operators to join my ranks." A bill tabled in parliament this month proposes extending the regulatory sandbox for AV deployments through December 31, 2028, ensuring the trials can continue uninterrupted until more comprehensive legislation takes effect. The work of people like Ahmad and Seng—alert, attentive, ready to intervene—will shape how that technology matures.
Citations marquantes
It's as though you are a driving instructor, and the vehicle is the student.— Sarah Ahmad, safety driver, Grab
We have to maintain concentration almost all the time. The concentration part is there so that we are able to prevent unforeseeable events.— Sherman Seng, safety driver, ComfortDelGro