In a nation that has long honoured Ben Roberts-Smith as the living embodiment of military courage, his arrest at Sydney Airport on charges of war crime murder forces a reckoning with the distance between decorated valour and alleged atrocity. The most decorated living veteran in Australia, a Victoria Cross recipient, now faces five counts of intentionally killing unarmed Afghan detainees between 2009 and 2012 — allegations a civil court already found credible, and which criminal proceedings must now weigh against the higher threshold of beyond reasonable doubt. His case arrives not in isolatio
Australia's most decorated veteran charged with killing 5 unarmed Afghans
Five unarmed Afghan detainees allegedly killed by Roberts-Smith; broader military investigation documented 39 unlawful killings of Afghan prisoners, farmers and non-combatants.
Some of them broke down after they testified, so difficult was it to speak out.
Mark
So Roberts-Smith was Australia's most decorated living veteran—what does that actually mean in terms of his standing before this arrest?
Mimi
He'd been awarded the Victoria Cross and the Medal of Gallantry for his service in Afghanistan. Those are the highest honors. He was a corporal in the SAS, the most elite unit. He had real status.
Luke
But the civil court had already found the core allegations credible in 2023. This isn't a surprise to the legal system.
Mimi
Right. The defamation case he brought against newspapers backfired. The judge ruled he likely did unlawfully kill four non-combatants. So the civil finding was already there.
Mark
What's the difference between what the civil court found and what these criminal charges require?
Luke
The civil court used a balance of probabilities—basically, more likely than not. Criminal charges require proof beyond reasonable doubt. It's a much higher bar.
Mimi
And that matters because the potential sentence is life in prison. The stakes are completely different.
Mark
Will the same evidence from the civil trial be used here?
Mimi
Likely. The journalist McKenzie said SAS colleagues are expected to testify again. Some of them broke down during the civil trial.
Luke
But here's what we don't know yet: whether those soldiers will testify the same way, whether new evidence will emerge, or how a criminal jury will weigh testimony from his own unit members.
Mark
How does this fit into the broader picture of what happened in Afghanistan?
Mimi
A 2020 military report found evidence that Australian elite forces unlawfully killed 39 Afghan prisoners, farmers, and non-combatants. This is one case within that larger pattern.
Luke
Though it's worth noting: 53 war crimes were investigated, and only 39 of those investigations concluded without charges. We don't have full clarity on all of them.
Mark
So this is rare accountability.
Mimi
Very rare. Roberts-Smith is only the second Australian Afghanistan veteran to face criminal war crime charges.
The Pulse
- Australia's most decorated living soldier was arrested at Sydney Airport and charged with five counts of war crime murder — a moment that shook the country's understanding of its own military identity.
- The alleged victims were unarmed Afghan detainees under ADF control, shot either directly by Roberts-Smith or by subordinates acting on his orders — a chain of command now at the centre of a criminal case carrying potential life imprisonment.
- A civil court in 2023 had already found the war crimes allegations credible on the balance of probabilities, but criminal conviction demands proof beyond reasonable doubt, raising the legal stakes considerably higher.
- His case is not isolated: a 2020 military report found evidence of 39 unlawful killings by Australian elite forces in Afghanistan, and a special investigator's office has since pursued 53 separate war crime inquiries.
- SAS colleagues who testified — some breaking down on the stand — are expected to return for the criminal trial, caught between unit loyalty and the weight of what they witnessed.
- With a second Afghanistan veteran already pleading not guilty to a separate war crime murder charge, Australia is navigating an unprecedented and painful moment of criminal accountability for a two-decade deployment.
In a nation that has long honoured Ben Roberts-Smith as the living embodiment of military courage, his arrest at Sydney Airport on charges of war crime murder forces a reckoning with the distance between decorated valour and alleged atrocity. The most decorated living veteran in Australia, a Victoria Cross recipient, now faces five counts of intentionally killing unarmed Afghan detainees between 2009 and 2012 — allegations a civil court already found credible, and which criminal proceedings must now weigh against the higher threshold of beyond reasonable doubt. His case arrives not in isolation but as part of a broader national accounting, one in which a military investigation documented 39 unlawful killings by Australia's elite forces in Afghanistan. What is on trial is not only one man's conduct, but the moral architecture of war itself.
Ben Roberts-Smith, 47, Australia's most decorated living veteran and a Victoria Cross recipient, was arrested at Sydney Airport after a flight from Brisbane and charged with five counts of war crime murder. The allegations concern the killing of five unarmed Afghan detainees between 2009 and 2012, during his service as a Special Air Service corporal. Australian Federal Police Commissioner Krissy Barrett stated that the victims were under ADF control when they were killed — shot either by Roberts-Smith directly or by subordinates acting on his orders. A conviction would carry a potential sentence of life imprisonment.
The criminal charges arrive with significant legal history already behind them. In 2023, a federal judge rejected Roberts-Smith's defamation lawsuit against newspapers that had published war crimes allegations in 2018, finding those allegations credible on the civil standard of balance of probabilities. The High Court later declined to hear his appeal. The criminal case now demands a higher bar: proof beyond reasonable doubt. Roberts-Smith appeared in court the day after his arrest and was expected to seek bail.
The case is part of a wider reckoning. A 2020 military report found evidence that SAS and commando troops unlawfully killed 39 Afghan prisoners, farmers, and non-combatants during the country's two-decade involvement in Afghanistan. A dedicated Office of the Special Investigator was established to pursue these allegations alongside federal police, though 39 of the 53 investigations it conducted concluded without charges.
Journalist Nick McKenzie, who has pursued these allegations since 2017, noted that SAS colleagues who testified during the civil trial — some visibly distressed — are expected to appear again in criminal proceedings. Their position remains fraught: soldiers from within one of Australia's most secretive fighting forces, forced to choose between loyalty to their unit and accountability for what they saw. Roberts-Smith is the second Afghanistan veteran to face war crime charges; former SAS soldier Oliver Schulz has already pleaded not guilty to a separate count of war crime murder. Together, their cases mark a rare and consequential attempt to hold elite military conduct to criminal account.
Ben Roberts-Smith, the most decorated living veteran in Australia's military, was arrested at Sydney Airport on Tuesday after arriving on a flight from Brisbane. The 47-year-old former Special Air Service corporal, who had been awarded both the Victoria Cross and Medal of Gallantry for his service in Afghanistan, was taken into custody and charged with five counts of war crime murder. Police did not initially confirm his identity, but media outlets quickly identified him based on the circumstances of the arrest and the nature of the allegations.
The charges allege that Roberts-Smith killed five unarmed Afghans between 2009 and 2012 while deployed with the Australian Defence Force. According to Australian Federal Police Commissioner Krissy Barrett, the victims were detained and under the control of ADF members at the time they were killed. Barrett stated that it would be alleged the victims were shot either by Roberts-Smith directly or by subordinate ADF members acting under his orders. War crime murder, defined under Australian federal law as the intentional killing of a person not taking active part in hostilities—including civilians, prisoners of war, and wounded soldiers—carries a potential sentence of life imprisonment.
Roberts-Smith made his first court appearance on Wednesday and was expected to apply for bail release. The case arrives with significant legal precedent already established. In 2023, a federal judge had rejected Roberts-Smith's defamation lawsuit against several newspapers that published allegations of war crimes in 2018. That civil court ruling found the war crimes allegations credible on a balance of probabilities and determined he likely unlawfully killed four non-combatants in 2009 and 2012. The High Court declined to hear his appeal in September, closing that legal avenue. However, the criminal charges now before him require proof to a higher standard—beyond reasonable doubt—rather than the civil court's balance of probabilities test.
The charges emerge from a broader military investigation into conduct by Australia's elite forces in Afghanistan. A 2020 military report documented evidence that SAS and commando regiment troops unlawfully killed 39 Afghan prisoners, farmers, and other non-combatants. The Office of the Special Investigator was subsequently established to work with police on war crime allegations. According to the office's director of investigations, Ross Barnett, 53 war crimes had been investigated, with 39 of those investigations concluding without charges being brought.
Journalist Nick McKenzie, who has been investigating allegations against Roberts-Smith since 2017, noted that SAS colleagues are expected to testify in the criminal trial as they did during the civil proceedings. McKenzie described the difficulty these soldiers faced in coming forward, saying some broke down while testifying about conduct they witnessed. He emphasized the challenge of investigating conduct within Australia's most secretive and elite fighting force, where members must choose between loyalty to their unit and accountability for what they observed.
Roberts-Smith is the second Australian Afghanistan veteran to face war crime charges. Former SAS soldier Oliver Schulz, 44, has pleaded not guilty to one count of war crime murder. Schulz is accused of shooting an Afghan man named Dad Mohammad three times in the head in a wheat field in Uruzgan province in May 2012. Between 2001 and 2021, approximately 40,000 Australian military personnel served in Afghanistan, of whom 41 were killed. The charges against Roberts-Smith represent a rare moment of criminal accountability for alleged conduct during that two-decade deployment.
Notable Quotes
It will be alleged that the victims were not taking part in hostilities at the time of their alleged murder in Afghanistan. It will be alleged the victims were detained, unarmed and were under the control of ADF members when they were killed.— Australian Federal Police Commissioner Krissy Barrett
For them to come forward and say, 'Well, we served our country bravely like Ben Roberts-Smith did, alongside him in Afghanistan, but we saw things with our own eyes that we feel uncomfortable about'—these brave soldiers, some of them broke down after they testified.— Journalist Nick McKenzie
Want the full story?
Read the original at CBC.ca ↗
Crime & Justice