Australia's decorated soldier charged with five Afghanistan war crime murders

Five unarmed Afghan civilians were allegedly killed while detained and under control of Australian Defense Force members.
detained, unarmed and under the control of ADF members
Police described the alleged victims' status at the time they were killed, distinguishing them from combatants.
Mark

So this is the second Australian soldier charged with Afghanistan war crimes. What makes this case different from the Schulz case?

Mimi

The scale, mainly. Schulz is accused of one killing. This soldier faces five counts. And the civil courts have already found he likely killed noncombatants unlawfully—that's a significant predicate.

Luke

But that's exactly the point Mark should understand: civil findings don't equal criminal guilt. The civil court said "likely" on a balance of probabilities. Criminal court says "beyond reasonable doubt." Those are different worlds.

Mark

So the civil case was almost a rehearsal?

Mimi

In a way. It established a factual record. But Luke's right—the criminal charges are a fresh start legally. The prosecution has to prove everything again, to a much higher standard.

Luke

And we should note: the police haven't even named him publicly yet. We know he's 47, we know he was arrested at the airport, but the full identity is still under wraps.

Mark

Why would they do that?

Mimi

Possibly to protect his privacy until the court appearance, or to manage the information flow. But it's worth flagging that we're working with incomplete information about who this person is.

Luke

The broader context is also important: 53 war crimes investigated, 39 closed without charges. This is rare. Most investigations didn't lead to prosecution.

Mark

So these are exceptional cases?

Mimi

They appear to be. The military report found 39 unlawful killings, but that doesn't mean 39 prosecutions. The investigative office has been selective about which cases move forward.

Luke

And we don't know why some were charged and others weren't. That's a question the reporting doesn't answer.

  • Australia's most decorated soldier was arrested at Sydney Airport on Tuesday, charged with five war crime murders — a moment that signals the criminal justice system is now reaching where civil courts have already been.
  • The alleged victims were unarmed Afghan nationals, detained and under Australian military control at the moment they were killed, placing the charges at the most serious end of the laws of armed conflict.
  • Civil courts had already found the allegations mostly proven on a balance of probabilities, but criminal prosecution demands proof beyond reasonable doubt — a far higher bar that now defines the next contest.
  • The accused had sued newspapers for defamation after they published war crime allegations in 2018, only for the resulting civil litigation to largely validate what he sought to refute.
  • Of 53 war crime investigations opened by Australia's Office of the Special Investigator, 39 have closed without charges — making each prosecution that does proceed a rare and consequential event.
  • Police Commissioner Barrett was careful to frame the charges as confined to a very small number of personnel, insisting the conduct does not define the 40,000 Australians who served in Afghanistan over two decades.

In the long aftermath of war, accountability moves slowly but does not always stand still. A 47-year-old former Australian soldier — his country's most decorated — was arrested Tuesday at Sydney Airport and charged with five counts of war crime murder for the alleged killing of unarmed, detained Afghan nationals between 2009 and 2012. The charges represent only the second such criminal prosecution of an Australian veteran from the Afghanistan campaign, arriving years after civil courts had already found the allegations largely substantiated, and against the wider backdrop of a 2020 military report documenting 39 unlawful killings by elite Australian troops. The case asks what justice owes to the dead, and what a nation owes to the truth of what was done in its name.

A 47-year-old former Australian soldier was arrested at Sydney Airport on Tuesday after flying in from Brisbane, charged with five counts of war crime murder. The allegations cover his service in Afghanistan between 2009 and 2012, during which he is accused of killing unarmed Afghan nationals who were detained and under Australian Defense Force control at the time of their deaths. Australian Federal Police Commissioner Krissy Barrett announced the charges, stating the victims were not engaged in active hostilities and were shot either by the accused directly or by subordinates acting on his orders.

The case is only the second criminal war crime prosecution of an Australian Afghanistan veteran. The first, former SAS soldier Oliver Schulz, has pleaded not guilty to a single count of war crime murder for the alleged killing of an Afghan man in a Uruzgan province wheatfield in 2012. War crime murder in Australia carries a potential life sentence and is defined as the intentional killing, during armed conflict, of a person not actively participating in hostilities.

The accused's legal history is already substantial. After newspapers published war crime allegations against him in 2018, he sued for defamation — but the civil proceedings that followed produced findings that largely substantiated the underlying claims. Australia's highest court declined to hear his appeal of a 2023 federal judge's ruling that he had likely unlawfully killed four Afghans, and three federal court judges had unanimously rejected an earlier appeal of the same finding. Civil and criminal proceedings operate on different standards, however: civil courts found the allegations proven on a balance of probabilities, while criminal charges require proof beyond reasonable doubt.

These prosecutions are part of a broader national reckoning. A 2020 military report documented evidence that elite SAS and commando troops had unlawfully killed 39 Afghan prisoners, farmers, and other noncombatants. The Office of the Special Investigator has since examined 53 alleged war crimes in total, though 39 of those investigations have concluded without charges. Commissioner Barrett stressed that the alleged conduct involved only a very small number of personnel among the roughly 40,000 Australians who served in Afghanistan between 2001 and 2021, 41 of whom were killed in action. The accused was expected to appear in a Sydney court later the same day; police have not yet released his name.

A 47-year-old former Australian soldier was arrested at Sydney Airport on Tuesday after arriving on a flight from Brisbane, charged with five counts of war crime murder. The allegations span his service in Afghanistan between 2009 and 2012, during which he is accused of killing unarmed Afghan nationals who were detained and under the control of Australian Defense Force members at the time of their deaths. Australian Federal Police Commissioner Krissy Barrett announced the charges, stating that it would be alleged the victims were not engaged in active hostilities when they were killed, and that they were shot either by the accused or by subordinate ADF members acting under his orders.

The case marks only the second time an Australian veteran of the Afghanistan campaign has faced war crime charges. The first is Oliver Schulz, a former Special Air Service Regiment soldier now 44 years old, who has pleaded not guilty to a single count of war crime murder. Schulz is accused of shooting an Afghan man named Dad Mohammad three times in the head in a wheatfield in Uruzgan province in May 2012. War crime murder in Australia carries a potential sentence of life imprisonment and is defined as the intentional killing during armed conflict of a person not actively participating in hostilities—a category that includes civilians, prisoners of war, and wounded soldiers.

The charges arrive against a backdrop of civil court findings that have already shaped the accused's legal standing. In September of the previous year, Australia's highest court declined to hear his appeal against a federal judge's 2023 civil ruling that he had likely unlawfully killed four Afghans. Three federal court judges had unanimously rejected his earlier appeal of that same finding. The distinction between civil and criminal proceedings is significant: while civil courts found the war crimes allegations were mostly proven on a balance of probabilities, criminal charges require proof beyond reasonable doubt—a substantially higher threshold.

The path to these charges began in 2018 when several newspapers published articles accusing the soldier of various war crimes. He responded by suing for defamation, but the civil litigation that followed produced findings that largely substantiated the underlying allegations, even if they fell short of the criminal standard. The accused's legal team has now exhausted appellate remedies in the civil system, leaving the criminal charges as the next arena for contesting the allegations.

These prosecutions emerge from a broader reckoning with conduct during Australia's two-decade military presence in Afghanistan. A military report released in 2020 documented evidence that elite Australian SAS and commando regiment troops had unlawfully killed 39 Afghan prisoners, farmers, and other noncombatants. The Office of the Special Investigator, established to work with police on war crime allegations, has since investigated 53 alleged war crimes in total. Of those 53 investigations, 39 have concluded without charges being filed.

Police Commissioner Barrett emphasized that the conduct in question involved only a small number of personnel. "The alleged conduct related to these charges is confined to a very small section of our trusted and respected ADF," she told reporters. She stressed that the overwhelming majority of Australian Defense Force members serve with honor and distinction, and that the charges do not reflect the values or conduct of the force as a whole. Between 2001 and 2021, approximately 40,000 Australian military personnel served in Afghanistan, of whom 41 were killed in action.

The accused is expected to appear in a Sydney court later on the day of his arrest. Police have not yet released his name publicly. The case will now proceed through the criminal justice system, where prosecutors must prove the allegations to the higher standard required in criminal proceedings—a substantially different burden than the civil findings that preceded these charges.

It will be alleged that the victims were not taking part in hostilities at the time of their alleged murder in Afghanistan. It will be alleged the victims were detained, unarmed and were under the control of ADF members when they were killed.
— Australian Federal Police Commissioner Krissy Barrett
The alleged conduct related to these charges is confined to a very small section of our trusted and respected ADF. The overwhelming majority of our ADF do our country proud.
— Australian Federal Police Commissioner Krissy Barrett
Quer a matéria completa? Leia o original em NBC News ↗
Fale Conosco FAQ