ASUS ROG Strix Scar 17 SE Review: A Top-Tier Performer Held Back by Battery Life and a Missing Webcam

A helluva RTX 3080 laptop, built to stay plugged in
GamesRadar's verdict on a machine with chart-topping speed but about an hour of battery while gaming.
Mark

So what's the headline here? Why does this laptop get such a strong recommendation?

Mimi

Raw performance. The i9-12950HX and RTX 3080 Ti pushed Shadow of the Tomb Raider to 176fps and hit 20,977 in Cinebench R5. It also stayed quiet and cool, which surprised the reviewer.

Mark

And it costs less than a comparable rival?

Mimi

Over $3,000, and the review says a similar Razer Blade 17 is almost $500 more and doesn't quite match it.

Luke

Worth noting that comparison is the reviewer's claim. The piece doesn't show the Razer's numbers side by side, so I'd treat it as an assessment, not a measured result.

Mark

What's the catch?

Mimi

No webcam, 75% Adobe RGB, about three hours of office battery and one hour gaming, and around 3kg plus a big power brick.

Luke

The weight is also inconsistent in the review. The spec list says 6.61lbs, or 3kg, while the text says 3.1kg. Small, but it's there.

Mark

Which screen should a buyer pick?

Mimi

The reviewer prefers the QHD 240Hz for most people. The 360Hz FHD only really pays off in esports titles.

Luke

And only those titles come close to using it. Also, the tested unit was the 360Hz version, so we don't have benchmark numbers for the QHD panel.

Mark

Anything about the memory?

Luke

The text says 32GB in the specs and 16GB in one performance paragraph. The review doesn't reconcile that, so check the configuration before buying.

  • A flagship gaming beast at over $3,000 promises top-tier performance but arrives with a visible catch that gives pause to any shopper.
  • Frame rates climb past 100fps across demanding AAA titles, and the 360Hz panel pushes esports smoothness to its limits.
  • Battery life collapses to roughly three hours of office work and about an hour of gaming, forcing the machine to stay tethered to the wall.
  • The missing webcam and modest 75% Adobe RGB coverage clash with expectations set by a premium price, leaving creators and video callers looking elsewhere.
  • The reviewer steers buyers toward the QHD 240Hz screen and rival machines like the Razer Blade 17 or Alienware X17 R2 for those who need portability.

A machine built for those who want to push every frame out of a screen has arrived at the edge of the portable world, where raw power and ostentatious design sit side by side with compromises that only the sitting-down hours reveal. Two weeks of working, playing and watching on the ASUS ROG Strix Scar 17 SE showed a laptop that can outrun almost anything carried into a room, yet asks its owner to stay near a wall and forgive a missing camera. It is a reminder that the pursuit of speed has always traded away something, whether mobility, quiet, or the small comforts of ordinary use. For the buyer who values performance above all, the trade may be worth making.

GamesRadar's reviewer lived with the ASUS ROG Strix Scar 17 SE for two weeks, first as a primary Windows machine for writing, research, photo editing and gaming, then as a device for gaming and media away from the desk. The verdict was clear: here is one of the most powerful gaming laptops available, undone by short battery life and the absence of a webcam.

At north of $3,000, the tested unit packs an Intel Core i9-12950HX, an RTX 3080 Ti, 32GB of DDR5 memory and two 1TB SSDs behind a 17.3-inch 1080p, 360Hz display. Its design is loud and deliberate, with a glowing ROG logo, a translucent keyboard deck and a wraparound light bar that can be tuned in Armoury Crate. The keyboard is not mechanical, yet it feels responsive, and the ports sit mostly at the back, keeping desks tidy.

Performance is where the machine earns its place. Games such as Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Metro Exodus and Red Dead Redemption 2 run at smooth, high frame rates, and it stays remarkably quiet under load. The price of that power is paid away from the wall: about three hours of office use, roughly an hour of gaming, and a weight near 3kg that makes it a difficult travel companion.

The reviewer would choose the QHD 240Hz screen for most buyers, and would point anyone needing portability toward the Razer Blade 17 or Alienware X17 R2, both with webcams. For raw speed, few laptops can match it.

GamesRadar's reviewer spent two weeks with the ASUS ROG Strix Scar 17 SE, using it for the first week as the primary Windows machine for writing, research, photo editing and gaming, and in the second week as a gaming and media device away from the desk. The verdict: it is one of the most powerful and competent gaming laptops on the market, held back by a short battery life and a missing webcam.

The unit tested retails at north of $3,000 or £3,000. Inside are an Intel Core i9-12950HX processor, an Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 Ti with 16GB of GDDR6, 32GB of DDR5-4800 memory and two 1TB M.2 NVMe SSDs. The 17.3-inch IPS-level display runs at 1080p, 360Hz with a 3ms response time. The review notes that a similarly specced Razer Blade 17 costs almost $500 more and does not quite match its performance. Listed deals in the piece range from $3,599 to $3,999.99.

The design is big, bold and unsubtle. The lid carries a backlit ROG logo and hidden graphics that reveal secret codes under UV light, and half of the keyboard deck is translucent so the internals are visible. A wrap-around Aura Sync RGB light bar runs across the front and sides, with more lighting on the bottom bezel of the screen. The keyboard is fully backlit, and all the lighting is adjustable in the Armoury Crate software.

The keyboard has a numpad that is not mechanical, but the reviewer found it responsive and satisfying, with slightly domed keycaps and 2mm of travel. The touchpad is large enough, though smaller than the Razer Blade 17's. Most ports sit on the back, which helps cable management, with two USB ports and a headphone jack on the left. The right side is bare apart from a port for the ROG Keystone, which can activate custom profiles, secure the laptop or unlock an encrypted shadow drive. The speakers get loud without distortion but lack bass, and directionality is iffy.

The screen comes in FHD 360Hz or QHD 240Hz versions. The reviewer calls the 360Hz panel ridiculously smooth, with vibrant colors and contrast, but at just 75% Adobe RGB it is poor for color-accurate work. The reviewer also calls the absence of a webcam unacceptable in 2022.

Performance is where the machine justifies itself. The 16-core processor runs at 65W, and the RTX 3080 Ti can reach 175W with dynamic boost, which the review describes as the fastest laptop GPU. Scores included 13,822 in 3DMark Time Spy, 29,616 in Fire Strike, 16,093 in Fire Strike Extreme, 8,329 in Port Royal, 7,839 in PCMark 10, and 20,977 in Cinebench R5. The SSD hit 6,990MB/s reads and 5,106MB/s writes. At 1080p on Ultra or highest settings, Shadow of the Tomb Raider ran at 176fps (140fps with ray tracing), Metro Exodus Enhanced at 108fps (96fps with ray tracing), The Division 2 at 112fps, Total War: Three Kingdoms at 106fps and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 67fps. Doom Eternal ran at almost 200fps. Only esports titles like Valorant or CS:GO come close to the panel's 360Hz.

The machine stayed far quieter under load than most laptops the reviewer has tested. Temperatures averaged in the mid-80s during long sessions, and the keyboard deck stayed cool. Battery life is the cost: about three hours of moderate office and web use, and about an hour of gaming, with reduced performance away from the wall. The laptop is 2.8cm at its thickest, but its weight of roughly 3kg and its large power brick make it a poor travel companion.

The reviewer would choose the QHD 240Hz screen, which suits high-resolution games and creative work better. Buyers who want portability are pointed to the Razer Blade 17 or Alienware X17 R2, both of which have webcams. For raw performance, the review says, hardly any laptop is better.

If it's raw performance you care about, there's hardly a laptop better than this.
— GamesRadar+ reviewer (paraphrased)
The missing webcam is unacceptable in 2022.
— GamesRadar+ reviewer (paraphrased)
Quer a matéria completa? Leia o original em GamesRadar+ ↗
Fale Conosco FAQ