A young California company called Reflect Orbital has asked for permission to test a single mirror satellite in orbit, the first step toward a sky where sunlight could be sold to whoever pays for it after dusk. Humanity has long lit its nights to extend work, safety, and comfort, and this proposal pushes that impulse outward into space itself. Astronomers, physicists, and ethicists see in it a question older than any technology: who gets to decide what the shared sky will look like, and what is lost when the dark is treated as a commodity.
Astronomers Warn Reflect Orbital's Plan to 'Sell Sunlight' From Space Mirrors Could Be 'Catastrophic'
Light the sky is the product, not the side effect
So what is Reflect Orbital actually asking for right now?
Permission to launch one test satellite, EARENDIL-1, in early 2026. The 4,000-mirror constellation by 2030 is the larger vision, contingent on the test working.
And the mirror itself is big?
Up to 59 feet across, lighting a patch about 3 miles wide at up to four times the full moon. Later mirrors could reach 177 feet.
Those brightness figures come from the company's own representatives. They haven't been independently verified.
Does the solar power idea hold up?
Researchers writing in The Conversation and Big Think say the light would be thousands of times weaker than midday sun, and a mirror could hold one spot for about four minutes.
Worth noting those four minutes are a prediction, not a measurement. And the Znamya history shows control is hard, but it's two failures from the 1990s, not proof about modern designs.
Why do astronomers see this as different from Starlink?
Starlink reflects light by accident. Here, lighting the sky is the product. Robert Massey called that catastrophic from an astronomical view.
Be careful with the eye damage and pilot warnings. They come from past research and several experts' concerns, not from any observed incident. And Lawler's guess that the FCC may approve it is speculation.
What's still unknown?
The environmental assessment on wildlife comes only after launch, so those effects are unassessed.
Right, and I'd add that we don't have the FCC's reasoning yet, so the precedent question is open.
Der Puls
- A startup wants up to 4,000 orbital mirrors that could spill artificial daylight onto chosen patches of night-time ground.
- Astronomers call the plan catastrophic, warning that thousands of reflectors would drown out the stars and blind observers.
- Experts question the physics and economics, noting reflected light is far weaker than the sun and power from it would be painfully expensive.
- The first test satellite, EARENDIL-1, awaits an FCC decision in early 2026, and that ruling could open the door to orbital light pollution.
A young California company called Reflect Orbital has asked for permission to test a single mirror satellite in orbit, the first step toward a sky where sunlight could be sold to whoever pays for it after dusk. Humanity has long lit its nights to extend work, safety, and comfort, and this proposal pushes that impulse outward into space itself. Astronomers, physicists, and ethicists see in it a question older than any technology: who gets to decide what the shared sky will look like, and what is lost when the dark is treated as a commodity.
A California startup called Reflect Orbital has asked the U.S. Federal Communications Commission for permission to launch a single test satellite, EARENDIL-1, in early 2026. If the test works, the company imagines as many as 4,000 similar satellites circling the planet by 2030, each one a mirror meant to bounce sunlight onto dark patches of ground for paying customers. Astronomers have answered with alarm, calling the idea catastrophic and horrifying.
The pitch is simple to state. Giant reflectors in low Earth orbit would catch the sun's rays after it has set for a given spot and redirect them to farms, solar panels, or streetlights below. The test mirror would be about 59 feet across and could light a patch of ground roughly 3 miles wide, possibly four times brighter than the full moon. Later versions could be far larger.
Many specialists doubt the promise. Reflected sunlight is thousands of times weaker than the midday sun, and a single mirror might hold a spot for only minutes. Russia's Znamya experiments in the 1990s ended in failure, with both satellites burning up and the program abandoned. Researchers warn that the power produced would cost far more than other renewable sources.
The deeper fear is about the sky itself. One mirror would hardly register, but thousands could make the stars nearly impossible to see from many places, could dazzle pilots, and could harm eyes that look toward them. Debris, collisions, and tumbling mirrors add further danger, and spent reflectors could scatter metal through the atmosphere. Critics also worry that a small firm and a single federal agency could reshape the night for everyone. The FCC's decision on EARENDIL-1 will show whether that worry is premature.
A California startup called Reflect Orbital has asked the U.S. Federal Communications Commission for permission to launch a single test satellite, EARENDIL-1, in early 2026. If the application is granted and the tests work, company representatives have told Space.com, Live Science's sister site, they envision as many as 4,000 similar satellites in orbit by 2030. Astronomers are calling the idea catastrophic and horrifying.
Founded in 2021, Reflect Orbital wants to sell sunlight after dark. Giant mirrors in low Earth orbit would bounce solar rays onto chosen spots on the night side of the planet. Paying customers could then generate solar power, grow crops or replace urban lighting during hours that would otherwise be dark.
The test satellite would unfurl a square reflector up to 59 feet (18 meters) across, with a surface area of about 3,500 square feet (325 square meters). It could light a patch of ground up to 3 miles (5 kilometers) wide, and the company says the light inside that patch would be as much as four times brighter than the full moon. Later satellites in the constellation could carry mirrors up to 177 feet (54 meters) across, which would likely make larger and more intense bright spots.
The mirrors would fly in a sun-synchronous orbit, circling pole to pole and staying aligned over the day-night divide. From there they could throw light from the daylit side onto ground just after sunset or before dawn. Experts say the basic physics is sound. Fionagh Thomson, a Durham University researcher who specializes in space ethics, calls the plan flawed from the outset and says the engineering complexity and crowded orbits make it unlikely to succeed. Russia tried something similar with its Znamya satellites in 1993 and 1999, then canceled the program after struggling to control them; both burned up in the atmosphere. No reflectors have been launched since.
The solar power pitch also draws skepticism. Researchers writing in The Conversation and Big Think point out that reflected light would be thousands of times weaker than the midday sun, so illuminated panels would produce only a sliver of their normal output. They predict a single mirror could hold light on one spot for no more than four minutes. Even if the numbers worked, Thomson says, the power would be "eye-wateringly expensive" next to other renewables. Samantha Lawler, an astronomer at the University of Regina, calls it a terrible idea, though she thinks the FCC may well approve EARENDIL-1.
The main worry for astronomers is light. One mirror would barely affect the night sky, but thousands would make it much harder to study the stars. Robert Massey of the U.K.'s Royal Astronomical Society says the community is seriously concerned about the impact and the precedent. Satellites such as SpaceX's Starlink reflect light accidentally. Massey notes that lighting the sky is this project's central goal, which he calls pretty catastrophic from an astronomical perspective.
Lawler says anyone caught in a bright spot would struggle to see any other stars. Past research, she adds, shows that looking at the reflectors through a telescope or binoculars could damage eyes. A mirror could be repositioned anywhere without warning, so there is no guaranteed way to avoid this. Several experts say sudden flashes could distract pilots during takeoff or landing. Earlier research on light pollution has linked it to changed behavior in many animal and plant species and to disrupted human sleep.
Other hazards come with the size. Large mirrors are more exposed to micrometeorites and to the growing cloud of space junk, and Lawler says they could end up riddled with holes and harder to control. A mirror that slipped out of control could tumble and flash across the sky, as NASA's Advanced Composite Solar Sail System did after deploying in August 2024. Planned satellite numbers worldwide already exceed what experts think low Earth orbit can safely hold, and spent reflectors would fall back to Earth, raising the prospect of atmospheric metal pollution. Reflect Orbital says it will carry out an environmental risk assessment, but only after EARENDIL-1 launches.
The company says its service is highly localized, with each reflection covering a defined area for a finite time, and that it can turn mirrors away from Earth when idle. Lawler's objection is about who decides: a small company with a few million dollars and one federal agency's approval, she says, could change the night sky for everyone. The FCC's decision on EARENDIL-1 is the thing to watch.
Bemerkenswerte Zitate
One tiny company in California can, with a few million dollars and the approval of a single U.S. federal agency, change the night sky for everyone in the world. It's horrifying.— Samantha Lawler, University of Regina
The central goal of this project is to light up the sky and extend daylight, and obviously, from an astronomical perspective, that's pretty catastrophic.— Robert Massey, Royal Astronomical Society