Apple Watch Ultra 2 Review: A Brighter, Faster Ultra That Still Trails Its Predecessor in Newness

The underside still says "Apple Watch Ultra."
Even the engraving on the Ultra 2 matches the original, showing how little changed outwardly.
Mark

Why review a watch that looks exactly like last year's?

Mimi

Because the sameness is the story. The reviewer couldn't tell them apart except by the new Trail Loop band, yet he still calls it the best Apple Watch available.

Luke

Worth noting this is one reviewer's judgment. The Editors' Choice label is the publication's, not a measured result.

Mark

What actually changed?

Mimi

Brightness goes from 2,000 to 3,000 nits, there's the S9 chip, storage doubles to 64GB, and Siri handles offline requests on the watch.

Luke

The 30% speed gain is Apple's claim. The reviewer says he didn't notice a significant difference from his old Ultra.

Mark

And Double Tap?

Mimi

He found it reliable but thin. He used it a handful of times and wants it to cover notifications and workout controls.

Luke

Whether Apple expands it is unknown. He only hopes it will.

Mark

Who should buy it?

Mimi

Not current Ultra owners. First-time buyers at $799 get a polished watch with a little over two days of battery.

  • The new Ultra 2 looks almost identical to the original, so the reviewer must search for differences hidden in brightness, speed and software.
  • Its 3,000-nit display is the brightest Apple has placed on a watch, yet it still dims to a single nit for dark rooms.
  • Siri now handles offline requests on the watch itself, and the old two-second delay on timers has nearly vanished.
  • Double Tap works reliably but is used so rarely that the reviewer keeps forgetting it exists, and it awaits software expansion.
  • Battery life holds just over two days, trailing some rivals, while health features stay unchanged from last year.
  • The verdict settles: existing owners can stay put, while new buyers at $799 receive a polished premium watch.

A watch that looks exactly like its predecessor has arrived in the quiet autumn of 2023, asking the familiar question of whether a refinement earns the name of an upgrade. Joe Maring, reviewing for Digital Trends, finds that its meaningful changes lie mostly beneath the surface: a brighter screen, a faster chip, and a voice assistant that answers without the detour through the phone. Its premium case and a price of $799 place it among the most polished tools its maker sells, yet the newest gesture meant to define it has not yet found its purpose. For those who already wear the original, the quieter gains may simply not be enough; for those arriving fresh, it offers a considered and dependable companion.

Turn the Apple Watch Ultra 2 over and the underside still says "Apple Watch Ultra." That small fact sums up Joe Maring's review for Digital Trends. Beside the original, the new watch is nearly impossible to distinguish, aside from a green and gray Trail Loop band. Still, Maring calls it the best and most premium Apple Watch available, and the site awarded it Editors' Choice at $799.

The real changes are mostly out of sight. The display keeps its size, but peak brightness climbs from 2,000 to 3,000 nits, and it can dim to a single nit for dark rooms. Inside sits the S9 chip, which Apple says is 30% faster, though Maring has not felt a major gap yet. The clearest difference he noticed was Siri: simple requests now run on the watch instead of bouncing through the iPhone, so timers that once lagged for seconds respond almost instantly.

The headline gesture, Double Tap, fares worst. Touching index finger and thumb can control music, calls, timers and widgets, and it works reliably, yet it does too little. Maring has used it only a handful of times and often forgets it exists. He hopes future software will widen its reach.

The hardware and health features remain as before, in a 49mm titanium case that is comfortable even on his small wrists. Battery life stretches a little over two days, which trails some rivals but leads the Apple Watch lineup. His final advice is simple: current Ultra owners can skip this one, but anyone buying their first Ultra should consider it.

Turn the Apple Watch Ultra 2 over and the underside still reads "Apple Watch Ultra." That detail captures the central finding of Joe Maring's review for Digital Trends: set beside the original, the new watch is impossible to tell apart, except for a new green and gray Trail Loop band. Maring still names it the best, most premium Apple Watch you can buy, and the site gave it an Editors' Choice designation at an $799 price.

The changes are real but mostly out of sight. The display is the same size OLED panel as before, but peak brightness rises from 2,000 nits to 3,000, the brightest Apple has put on a watch. It can also dim to a single nit, which Maring found useful at night or in a dark room. He reports no legibility problems, even in the last sunny days of October in the Midwest.

Inside is the new S9 chip, built on the A15 Bionic used in the iPhone 14 and 14 Plus. Apple claims it is 30% faster than last year's Ultra. Maring says the watch is fast, but admits he has not noticed a significant gap from his previous-generation Ultra. He expects the extra power to matter after years of use and software updates.

The place he did notice a difference was Siri. With the S9, requests that don't need an internet connection are processed on the watch rather than relayed to the iPhone and back. Setting a timer on his old Ultra often meant a delay of a couple of seconds; on the Ultra 2 it happens almost instantly. He calls it one of the most impactful changes of his testing. Other additions include Precision Finding for owners of an iPhone 15 or 15 Pro, which uses a second-generation Ultra Wideband chip to show the distance and direction of a lost phone, and internal storage doubled from 32GB to 64GB.

The headline feature, Double Tap, gets the harshest verdict. Tapping index finger and thumb together can play or pause music, answer calls, start a voice reply to a text, stop a timer or alarm, or scroll widgets in the watchOS 10 Smart Stack. It works reliably, Maring says, but does too little. He has used it a handful of times, mostly for the Smart Stack, and has to remind himself it exists. He wants it to handle notifications, pause and resume workouts, and switch recent apps, and he notes Apple's interface doesn't show where it works. He hopes software updates will expand it, but for now calls it a cool party trick.

The hardware is unchanged: a 49mm titanium case in natural finish only, despite rumors of a new color. It weighs 61.4 grams, more than 22 grams heavier than the 45mm aluminum Series 9, yet Maring, who describes his wrists as tiny, finds it comfortable. He praises the larger Digital Crown, the side button and its guard, and the Action button, especially pressing it with the side button to pause and resume runs. Health tracking is also unchanged, including 24/7 heart rate monitoring, SpO2, ECG, cycle tracking and custom heart rate zones.

Battery life runs a little over two days per charge in his use, with always-on display, workouts, notifications and no sleep tracking, and without Low Power Mode. That falls short of the Garmin Forerunner 265 or Fitbit Charge 6, but it is the best among Apple Watches. Last year's testing showed Low Power Mode can stretch the original Ultra to five days. Charging from zero to full takes about an hour and a half on the familiar magnetic puck.

The watch ships with watchOS 10, whose main addition is the Smart Stack: spin the Digital Crown from the watch face to reveal rearrangeable widgets. Maring keeps a five-hour forecast, calendar events, Activity rings and a heart rate graph, and the stack can add media, timer and Wallet widgets automatically. His advice is plain: current Ultra owners almost certainly don't need this one, while anyone considering their first Ultra should buy it.

Double Tap is a cool party trick that isn't as useful as he had hoped.
— Joe Maring, Digital Trends (paraphrased)
Current Apple Watch Ultra owners almost certainly don't need the new model.
— Joe Maring, Digital Trends (paraphrased)
Envie de l'histoire complète ? Lire l'original sur Digital Trends ↗
Nous contacter FAQ