Apple Watch Series 9 Impresses But Hints at Bigger Changes Ahead

It feels like the start of something, not the thing itself.
The Series 9's new features suggest a more intuitive future for Apple Watch, but current implementations still need refinement.
Mark

So after three months, is this watch worth the $399?

Mimi

If you don't have a recent Apple Watch and you use an iPhone, yes. If you have a Series 7 or 8, probably not yet.

Luke

What's the actual difference between the Series 9 and Series 8 in practice?

Mimi

Honestly? It's subtle. The new features—Siri health questions and Double Tap—are interesting but not essential. Most of the health sensors are the same.

Mark

Tell me about Siri answering health questions. That sounds useful.

Mimi

It is, in a limited way. You can ask how many steps you took or how you slept, and get an answer without navigating menus. But it only looks back about a week, and it can't do things like suggest a bedtime based on your activity.

Luke

Why can't it do that?

Mimi

Because Apple Watch doesn't have sleep coaching features. Garmin and Oura already do this. Siri can only work with data the watch is actually collecting.

Mark

What about Double Tap—the finger gesture?

Mimi

It works, but it doesn't feel natural yet. After three months I'm still consciously thinking about it instead of doing it automatically. One colleague found it helpful, so maybe it's just me.

Luke

Is there anything the Series 9 does better than competitors?

Mimi

The interface is snappier, and if you use other Apple devices, the integration is seamless. But Garmin and Oura beat it on battery life and health insights. They actually tell you what the data means.

Mark

So what's the real problem here?

Mimi

Apple collects tons of health data but doesn't synthesize it the way rivals do. It can't tell you whether you're ready for a workout or need rest. It can't score your sleep quality or coach you to sleep better. Fitbit is launching an AI program next year to do exactly that.

Luke

Battery life—how bad is it?

Mimi

One to two days depending on use. After a full day with exercise and sleep tracking, it had 35 percent left. Garmin lasts a week. Oura lasts four days.

Mark

Can you charge it quickly?

Mimi

Yes, 35 to 92 percent in 30 minutes. But you still have to charge every night, which makes sleep tracking harder than on devices with longer battery life.

Luke

So what's the takeaway?

Mimi

It's a competent device that does what it promises, but it doesn't feel like a leap forward. The new features hint at where Apple wants to go, but they're not there yet.

  • The Series 9 is the best smartwatch for iPhone users, yet after three months it feels almost indistinguishable from the Series 8 — raising the question of who, exactly, should be spending $399 on it.
  • Siri's new ability to answer health questions arrived months after launch and impresses in narrow ways, but hits a wall when asked for deeper insight — it cannot suggest a bedtime, identify your most active day, or look back further than a week.
  • Double Tap, the gesture that lets you control the watch by pinching thumb and forefinger, remains a conscious effort rather than an instinct after ninety days of use — promising, but not yet second nature.
  • Competitors like Garmin, Fitbit, and Oura are pulling ahead on the dimension that matters most: turning raw health data into actionable guidance, with sleep coaching, recovery scores, and AI-driven wellness analysis Apple has yet to offer.
  • Battery life — one to two days under real-world conditions — forces a nightly charging ritual that directly conflicts with the watch's sleep tracking ambitions, a tradeoff rivals have already begun to solve.

Three months into daily life with Apple's latest wearable, a familiar tension emerges: the Series 9 is a refined and capable companion for iPhone users, but refinement is not the same as revelation. At $399, it delivers on its promises — health monitoring, seamless integration, a polished interface — yet the distance between this watch and its predecessor feels more like a step than a stride. The new features it introduces, Siri health queries and Double Tap gesture control, point toward a more ambient and intuitive future, but they arrive as sketches rather than finished works.

Three months of daily wear with the Apple Watch Series 9 yields a clear verdict: it is a competent device that earns its place on the wrist, but not one that earns the feeling of progress.

For iPhone owners, it remains the obvious choice. The health suite is comprehensive — ECG, blood oxygen, skin temperature, sleep, workouts — and the interface is as intuitive as ever. Compared to the $249 Apple Watch SE, the gap is meaningful for anyone serious about health tracking. But compared to the Series 8, the gap is nearly invisible. Owners of a Series 7 or 8 have little reason to upgrade.

The two features that define the Series 9 both arrived late and both feel unfinished. Siri's health query capability — asking how you slept, how many steps you've taken, what your heart rate has been — is genuinely useful, but it cannot synthesize that data into guidance. It can report; it cannot advise. Privacy-preserving on-device processing limits its memory to roughly a week. Double Tap, the pinch gesture for controlling the watch hands-free, is responsive but not yet instinctive. After ninety days, it still requires conscious thought. A party trick with potential.

The deeper problem is what the watch does with the data it so diligently collects. Garmin and Oura translate numbers into meaning — recovery readiness, sleep coaching, big-picture wellness trends. Fitbit is preparing an AI-driven program to do the same. Apple can remind you to stand. It cannot tell you why last night's poor sleep should change today's plans.

Battery life compounds the issue. One to two days of real-world use means nightly charging — which, for anyone relying on overnight sleep tracking, creates a quiet but persistent conflict. The watch charges quickly, but quick charging is not the same as lasting longer.

What the Series 9 ultimately offers is a glimpse of where Apple is heading — more ambient, more conversational, less dependent on deliberate interaction — without yet arriving there. It is a solid watch for the right person. It is not, for most people who already own a recent Apple Watch, a reason to upgrade.

Three months into living with the Apple Watch Series 9, the picture is clear: it's a capable device that does what it promises, but it doesn't feel like the leap forward you might hope for at $399.

The Series 9 remains the best smartwatch for iPhone owners, no question. The interface is snappy and intuitive, the health monitoring suite is comprehensive, and it integrates seamlessly with the rest of Apple's ecosystem. If you're choosing between the Series 9 and the cheaper $249 Apple Watch SE, the difference is real—you get ECG monitoring, blood oxygen readings, and skin temperature sensing that the SE lacks. For someone genuinely concerned with tracking their health, those features matter. But here's the thing: the Series 9 feels almost identical to the Series 8 in daily use. If you own a Series 7 or Series 8 already, there's no urgent reason to upgrade.

Two of the Series 9's most interesting features didn't even arrive until after launch. Siri's ability to answer health questions rolled out in December, months after the watch hit stores, and it's genuinely useful—you can ask how many steps you've taken this week, how you slept last night, or what your average walking heart rate is, and get answers without digging through menus. But the feature also exposes Apple's limitations. Siri couldn't tell the reviewer what their most active day was this week. It can't suggest a bedtime based on activity and sleep patterns because Apple Watch doesn't offer sleep coaching the way Garmin and Oura do. The data is processed on the watch itself for privacy, which means Siri can only look back about a week. It's a promising start that hints at what could be, but it's not there yet.

Double Tap—the ability to control your watch by tapping your thumb and index finger together—is similarly intriguing and similarly incomplete. You can scroll through widgets, dismiss notifications, answer calls, play music, and capture photos with your iPhone's camera app. The gesture is responsive, but it doesn't feel natural yet. After three months, the reviewer still finds themselves consciously thinking about the motion rather than doing it instinctively. It's the kind of feature that might become second nature eventually, but right now it feels like a party trick rather than a genuine improvement to how you interact with the device. A colleague found it helpful and accurate, so mileage varies—but the consensus is that it's early days.

Where the Series 9 really falls short is in making sense of the health data it collects. Yes, it monitors ECG, heart rate, blood oxygen, temperature, sleep, and workouts. But competitors like Garmin and Fitbit do something Apple doesn't: they synthesize that data into actionable insights. They'll tell you whether you're ready for a hard workout or need recovery. They offer sleep scoring and coaching. Fitbit is launching an AI-powered program called Fitbit Labs in 2024 specifically to connect the dots between data points. Apple can nudge you to stand up and move, but it can't tell you that you slept poorly last night and should wind down earlier tonight. That gap is widening.

Battery life is another weak point. The Series 9 lasts one to two days depending on use—about average for its price range, but nowhere near the multi-day endurance of Garmin watches or the four-day battery of an Oura ring. After a day with 30 to 40 minutes of exercise, an outdoor walk, and overnight sleep tracking, the Series 9 had 35 percent battery left at morning. It charges quickly—35 to 92 percent in 30 minutes—but that's not the same as not needing to charge every night. For someone serious about sleep tracking, that's a real problem. You can't track sleep and activity without potentially sacrificing one or the other the next day.

What emerges from three months of use is a device that's doing its job competently but not transformatively. The Series 9 isn't a big leap over the Series 8, and the new features hint at where Apple wants to go without quite getting there. Siri's health knowledge and Double Tap suggest that future Apple Watches will be more ambient, more intuitive, less dependent on conscious interaction. But that future isn't here yet. For now, the Series 9 is a solid choice if you need a smartwatch and use an iPhone—just don't expect it to feel like a major upgrade, and don't expect it to match what Garmin and Oura are already doing with health data analysis and battery life.

The Series 9 isn't a big leap over the Series 8. If you have a recent Apple Watch, especially the Series 7 or Series 8, you can hold off on upgrading.
— Reviewer's conclusion after three months of daily use
I wish Apple did more to make sense of all the health data it gathers. Products from Garmin, Oura and Fitbit can make observations about whether you're ready for a workout or need to take a rest day.
— Reviewer on Apple's competitive weakness in health data analysis
Quer a matéria completa? Leia o original em CNET ↗
Fale Conosco FAQ