On an October morning in Parliament, Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim answered a question that has trailed the government's housing plans: whether state-linked investment companies should put their capital into homes at all. He answered by looking backward, to Putrajaya, a capital that he says was built on Petronas money channelled through Putrajaya Holdings, and forward, to student housing and civil servant accommodation. His implied claim is that public need and commercial return need not be opposed, and the test of that belief will unfold slowly, as the funds committed through 2028 meet the ord
Anwar Defends GLIC-Funded Housing, Citing Petronas' Role in Building Putrajaya
Public need and commercial return, pursued together rather than traded off
Mark
Why did Anwar reach back to Putrajaya to defend this?
Mimi
Because it's his precedent. He says Petronas funds built the capital through Putrajaya Holdings, so a state-linked company paying for public development isn't new.
Mark
And Kota Madani specifically?
Mimi
It's aimed at a shortage of civil servant housing in Putrajaya, with 80 per cent of units reserved for them.
Luke
Worth noting that's his description. The reporting doesn't say what the critics actually objected to.
Mark
He also mentioned students abroad.
Mimi
Yes, GLIC-backed student housing in Canada, South Korea, the Netherlands and the UK. He asked why it can't be done at home, starting with 10,000 units and aiming for 30,000.
Luke
Those are targets, not built homes. Nothing here says when they'd be delivered.
Mark
What about the money?
Mimi
RM120 billion in domestic direct investment committed for 2024 to 2028, plus RM440 billion already in the domestic public market.
Luke
Again, those are the prime minister's figures, and there's no independent check in the piece. And how GLICs balance national priorities against returns is still an open question.
Der Puls
- Criticism in Parliament questions whether GLICs should be investing public-linked capital in housing at all.
- Anwar counters by pointing to Petronas-funded Putrajaya as proof that state-linked companies have built public-facing developments before.
- Kota Madani reserves 80 per cent of its units for civil servants, while a student housing plan starts at 10,000 units and aims for 30,000.
- RM120 billion in domestic direct investment through 2028 now rides on whether national priorities and returns can actually be reconciled.
On an October morning in Parliament, Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim answered a question that has trailed the government's housing plans: whether state-linked investment companies should put their capital into homes at all. He answered by looking backward, to Putrajaya, a capital that he says was built on Petronas money channelled through Putrajaya Holdings, and forward, to student housing and civil servant accommodation. His implied claim is that public need and commercial return need not be opposed, and the test of that belief will unfold slowly, as the funds committed through 2028 meet the ordinary demands of a market.
On October 27, Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim faced a pointed question in the Dewan Rakyat during Question Time: should government-linked investment companies be putting money into homes? He answered by returning to Putrajaya, which he said was built with Petronas money from the start and developed through Putrajaya Holdings, a vehicle he described as covering government offices, amenities, hotels and tourism facilities.
He then turned to Kota Madani, meant to ease the shortage of accommodation for civil servants in Putrajaya, with 80 per cent of its units reserved for them. He also argued that GLICs already invest in student housing for Malaysians abroad, in Canada, South Korea, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom, and asked why the model could not be expanded at home. The first domestic phase would involve 10,000 units, with a longer target of 30,000.
Anwar was clear that this was not charity. In his view, serving people and serving commercial interests can happen together. He tied the push to domestic economic resilience and cited RM120 billion in domestic direct investment committed from 2024 to 2028, on top of RM440 billion already in the domestic public market. He also pointed to community programmes, Kampung Angkat covering 500 villages and Sekolah Angkat Madani covering 1,700 schools.
The account rests on the prime minister's own words in Parliament, and the reporting does not spell out the specific objections he was answering. What remains to be seen is how GLICs weigh national priorities against the returns they expect, as the committed capital is put to work.
On the morning of October 27, Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim stood in the Dewan Rakyat during Prime Minister's Question Time and answered a line of criticism that has followed the government's housing plans: should government-linked investment companies, the GLICs, be putting money into homes at all?
His answer started with Putrajaya. Anwar said the administrative capital was built with Petronas money from the start, channelled through Putrajaya Holdings. That entity, as he described it, covers government offices, public amenities, hotels, commercial ventures and tourism facilities. In his telling, a state-linked company funding public-facing development is not a new idea but the way the capital itself came to exist.
He then turned to the project at the centre of the current argument, Kota Madani. Anwar said it is meant to ease a shortage of accommodation for civil servants in Putrajaya, and that 80 per cent of its units are reserved for them.
He widened the frame to students. According to Anwar, GLICs have already invested in student accommodation for Malaysians studying in Canada, South Korea, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. If that works abroad, he asked, why can it not be expanded in Malaysia? He said the first phase of a domestic student accommodation initiative would involve 10,000 units, with a longer-term target of 30,000 units involving GLICs.
The prime minister did not present this as charity. He said it is not merely about helping people, but also about serving commercial needs and interests. That is the core of his argument: public need and commercial return, in his view, can be pursued together rather than traded off against each other.
He placed the housing push inside a larger effort to strengthen domestic economic resilience, and said GLICs are expected to weigh national priorities alongside the returns they seek. To show the scale of their domestic commitment, he cited figures: RM120 billion in domestic direct investments committed from 2024 to 2028, on top of RM440 billion already invested in the domestic public market.
Anwar also pointed to two community programmes backed by GLICs and private companies. Kampung Angkat, he said, covers 500 villages, and Sekolah Angkat Madani covers 1,700 schools.
The figures and the Putrajaya history come from the prime minister's own account in Parliament, and the reporting does not detail the specific criticisms he was answering. What to watch is how GLICs balance the national priorities Anwar describes against their investment returns, as the RM120 billion committed through 2028 is put to work.
Bemerkenswerte Zitate
Putrajaya was developed with Petronas funds from the outset.— Anwar Ibrahim, Prime Minister, in the Dewan Rakyat
So why can this not be expanded in Malaysia?— Anwar Ibrahim, on GLIC-funded student accommodation
Möchten Sie die ganze Geschichte?
Das Original lesen bei Yahoo ↗
Politics & Governance