Antisemitism envoy proposes external ombudsman to oversee ABC and SBS Middle East coverage

Jewish Australians report abuse and harassment following the Bondi beach massacre in December, in which 15 people were killed at a Hanukkah celebration.
A perceived link between coverage and hostility is itself a matter of public importance
Segal's argument for independent review of how ABC and SBS report on Gaza.
Mark

What is actually being proposed for the ABC and SBS?

Mimi

An external independent ombudsman to replace their internal ones, plus a government-appointed panel to review past reporting on Gaza and the Middle East.

Mark

Why now?

Mimi

The royal commission followed the Bondi massacre in December, and Segal says Jewish Australians face abuse she links, in perception, to coverage.

Luke

Note the wording. She speaks of a perceived link. The report doesn't establish that coverage causes hostility.

Mark

How have the broadcasters responded?

Mimi

Both defend their complaints systems. The ABC calls its process the most robust in Australian media, and SBS points to ACMA oversight.

Mark

And the visa screening?

Mimi

Home affairs would try to identify antisemitic conduct before granting visas, using technology and existing records.

Luke

The source doesn't say how that would work or what evidence would count. Critics fear people could be barred without evidence, but that is their concern, not a described mechanism.

Mark

Is any of this binding?

Luke

No. It's advice to government. Nothing here says it will be adopted.

Mimi

The Gaza death toll dispute shows the tension: Segal accepted the UN view but kept her concerns about how reporting was done.

  • A revised national plan proposes an external ombudsman to oversee ABC and SBS Gaza coverage, sharpening a fight that was already simmering.
  • Jewish community voices describe abuse and harassment in the wake of the Bondi attack, lending the debate an unmistakable emotional charge.
  • Advocates for Palestinians warn that visa screening and grant conditions could turn criticism of Israel into a route to exclusion.
  • Both broadcasters reply that their complaints systems are already robust, and the plan's advice remains non-binding for now.
  • The next test is whether the government moves on visa screening, grant conditions and a review of past reporting.

In late October, Australia's special envoy on antisemitism, Jillian Segal, put before the public a revised plan that asks for an independent ombudsman to watch over how the ABC and SBS cover Gaza and the wider Middle East, along with visa checks for antisemitic views. It arrives in a country still grieving the Bondi massacre, where Jewish citizens describe harassment and where the question of how the public is informed about a distant war has become tangled with fear, grievance and mistrust. The broadcasters insist their existing safeguards are sound, and the proposals remain advice rather than law, so the story now rests on whether a government willing to listen will choose to act.

Australia's antisemitism envoy, Jillian Segal, has released an updated plan that goes well beyond her first proposals from last year. It calls for an external independent ombudsman to monitor ABC and SBS coverage of the Gaza war, a government-appointed panel to review past reporting, and screening of every visa applicant for the risk of holding antisemitic views. Segal argues that concerns about reporting being subjective, inaccurate or disproportionate justify deeper outside scrutiny, and she points to Jewish Australians who say they have been abused and harassed since the Bondi massacre in December, when 15 people were killed at a Hanukkah celebration.

The plan also reaches into the arts and universities. Publicly funded arts bodies could attach enforceable conditions to grants and end funding where artists promote antisemitism, and grant authorities could do the same for academics. Segal says the aim is not to silence criticism of Israel and describes "modern, progressive antisemitism" as the most pervasive form in the country, though she acknowledges that other forms need vigilance too.

The reaction has been sharply divided. The Jewish Council of Australia called the plan dangerous and "Trumpian," while the Executive Council of Australian Jewry welcomed it as courageous. Palestinian advocates warned that barring people accused of antisemitism, perhaps without evidence, would be a racist step. The ABC and SBS both defended their frameworks, and SBS pointed to existing oversight by the Australian Communications and Media Authority. The plan is advice, not law, and its future depends on whether the government takes up the visa, grant and review proposals.

Australia's special envoy to combat antisemitism, Jillian Segal, has released an updated plan that proposes an "external independent ombudsman" to monitor ABC and SBS coverage of the war in Gaza. The plan, published on Friday, also calls for every visa applicant to be screened for "the risk of holding antisemitic views."

On the broadcasters, Segal argues that concerns about subjective, inaccurate and disproportionate reporting make it in the public interest for their coverage to face more detailed analysis and independent review. The plan suggests a government-appointed panel review their past reporting. It also says the government should consider transferring responsibilities from the ABC and SBS ombudsmen to an external body, modelled on oversight in sectors such as telecommunications and banking.

Segal writes that Jewish Australians have reported being abused and harassed, and called "baby killers" or supporters of "genocide" simply for believing in Israel's right to exist. The perceived link between coverage and that hostility, she says, is itself a matter of public importance. She says she has received many expressions of concern from the Jewish community about the broadcasters' reporting on Israel and the Middle East, and told Senate estimates this week she was worried about the tone and frequency of the ABC's Gaza reporting. The context is the royal commission into antisemitism, set up after the Bondi beach massacre in December, when 15 people were killed at a Hanukah celebration.

The position has shifted over time. Her first plan, in mid-2025, spoke of working with the broadcasters to develop programs that add to social cohesion. By mid-2026 she told the royal commission she wanted an oversight committee that could give coverage a "tick" or "guidance." The broadcasters rejected calls for external oversight last year. On Friday the ABC said its complaints process was the most robust and transparent in Australian media, and that its framework balances accountability with editorial independence. SBS said it condemns antisemitism unequivocally and that its framework is robust and fit for purpose, including external oversight by the Australian Communications and Media Authority.

The visa proposal says the home affairs department should prioritise identifying antisemitic conduct before a visa is granted, using new technology and information already on a client's record. Segal writes that a minority of migrants bring ingrained antisemitic views, often from places where antisemitism is reinforced by political, religious, educational and cultural institutions. Hiba Farra, vice-president of the Australian Palestine Advocacy Network, said she was alarmed at the prospect of barring people accused of antisemitism, potentially without evidence, calling it "a further step down a racist path" and arguing that conflating criticism of Israel with antisemitism dehumanises Palestinians.

The plan extends to arts and universities. Publicly funded arts bodies would be able to impose enforceable conditions on artists and end grants if they promoted antisemitism, and all arts organisations would be asked to set policies on use of their venues and on artists' political activism outside the advertised show. Grant authorities could also place enforceable conditions on academics, including terminating funding where a recipient engages in antisemitic speech or conduct. Segal says the proposals are not about silencing criticism of Israel. She describes "modern, progressive antisemitism" as the most pervasive form in Australia, one that gives hostility a respectable face through the language of social justice, while saying Islamic extremist, far-left and far-right antisemitism also need vigilance and enforced laws.

Reaction split sharply. The progressive Jewish Council of Australia called the plan "Trumpian" and a dangerous roadmap threatening free speech and academic freedom, and said the "progressive antisemitism" claims verged on conspiratorial. Its executive officer, Bart Shteinman, said the special envoy does not speak for all Jews. Alex Ryvchin, co-chief executive of the Executive Council of Australian Jewry, told 2GB radio that highlighting far-left antisemitism was "insightful and courageous," and said a groupthink at the broadcasters, driven by a handful of journalists and executives, could only be fixed through external accountability.

The release followed Segal's Senate estimates appearance two days earlier, where she defended her criticism of SBS for citing Gaza health ministry death tolls. She had told the royal commission the figures were "grossly inflated." A UN secretary general spokesperson said independent validation of subsets of the data found no significant discrepancies, and Segal told estimates she accepted the UN view, though it did not lessen the community's concerns about the reporting. Israel's military accepted in January that the health authorities' toll was broadly accurate. What happens next depends on whether the government acts on the visa, grant and review proposals.

Segal said the proposals are not about silencing criticism of Israel.
— Jillian Segal, antisemitism envoy
The ABC said its complaints process is the most robust and transparent in the Australian media.
— ABC spokesperson
Contattaci Domande frequenti