On the southern edge of the Indian subcontinent, where the Andaman Sea opens toward the wider Indian Ocean, India is weighing whether a remote island can become something larger than its own shoreline. Andaman and Nicobar Lieutenant Governor D K Joshi has argued, in a column for the Indian Express, that the Rs 81,000-92,000 crore Great Nicobar project is less a matter of building roads and ports than a test of whether a nation can read its geography and act before a chance becomes a danger. His case is made against a long history in which the ocean carried India's trade and vulnerabilities ali
Andaman LG Frames Great Nicobar Project as Strategic Test, Says Security and Ecology Can Coexist
Ecological sensitivity cannot become a permanent veto on strategic thinking.
Why does a Lieutenant Governor's column matter here? The project is already cleared.
Because he administers the islands. He is making the government's strategic case in public, weeks after the Centre issued its own detailed defence on May 1.
What is the core of his argument?
That Great Nicobar is a rare geographical advantage, and that sovereignty is strengthened when territory is connected, inhabited and usable. The port, airport, township and power plant are meant to work as one ecosystem.
Worth saying plainly: this is opinion. The claims about crowded Indian Ocean competition are his framing, not findings in the piece.
He cites Thailand. Does that support him?
He uses it to show trade routes shifting toward the Andaman basin. The land bridge at Ranong and Chumphon is, by his own account, still pending final approval.
So it is an example of a possibility, not a settled change. And the column gives no evidence on how it would affect Great Nicobar.
What about the environment?
He concedes the island is sensitive and calls for ecological care, monitoring and mitigation. The NGT cleared the project in February 2026.
Clearance is a fact. But the column does not say what the mitigation measures are, or address the tribal heritage concerns Rahul Gandhi raised. Those remain open.
Il Polso
- A Rs 81,000-92,000 crore plan to transform Great Nicobar into a maritime hub has become a flashpoint between strategic ambition and ecological and tribal concern.
- Rahul Gandhi's charge of a "crime against natural and tribal heritage" has pushed the project into open political confrontation.
- The Centre's May 1 defence and the NGT's February 2026 clearance show the project moving forward through official channels despite the dispute.
- Joshi frames the island as a counter to a crowded Indo-Pacific contest, pointing to Thailand's land bridge as proof that the trade map is being redrawn.
- The unresolved question is whether promised ecological safeguards and tribal protections will hold once construction begins on the island.
On the southern edge of the Indian subcontinent, where the Andaman Sea opens toward the wider Indian Ocean, India is weighing whether a remote island can become something larger than its own shoreline. Andaman and Nicobar Lieutenant Governor D K Joshi has argued, in a column for the Indian Express, that the Rs 81,000-92,000 crore Great Nicobar project is less a matter of building roads and ports than a test of whether a nation can read its geography and act before a chance becomes a danger. His case is made against a long history in which the ocean carried India's trade and vulnerabilities alike, and it is contested by voices who see in the same island a fragile and sacred inheritance that must not be traded for strategy.
Andaman and Nicobar Lieutenant Governor D K Joshi has made the case for the Great Nicobar Island Development Project in an opinion column in the Indian Express. The plan, worth Rs 81,000-92,000 crore, aims to make India's southernmost island a global maritime and strategic hub. Joshi insists it should be read as a test of the country's strategic judgment, not merely as an infrastructure scheme.
His argument begins with geography. Nations, he writes, are now measured less by economic size or military strength than by their ability to anticipate the future and act before an opportunity turns into a vulnerability. Great Nicobar, in his view, is one of India's most important windows onto the world, and the real question is whether the country can turn that advantage into greater national power.
Joshi sets this within a longer history. The Indian Ocean once carried India's trade and influence, and for much of the post-Independence era its strategic thinking looked inland. He describes an ocean now crowded with energy flows, shipping, naval deployments, undersea cables and surveillance. He points to Thailand's decision to shelve a canal in favour of a 90 km land bridge linking new ports at Ranong and Chumphon, as evidence that the trade map is shifting toward the Andaman basin.
The project is politically contested. Rahul Gandhi, visiting the island in April, accused the government of a "crime against natural and tribal heritage". The Centre answered on May 1 with a defence stressing strategic importance, and the National Green Tribunal cleared the project in February 2026.
Joshi concedes that the island is environmentally fragile and that a project of this scale demands ecological care, legal compliance, scientific monitoring and real mitigation. Yet he argues that ecological sensitivity cannot become a permanent veto over strategy. The column is an argument from the official who administers the islands, not a new policy announcement, and what happens next will depend on how the promised safeguards and tribal concerns are handled as work begins.
Andaman and Nicobar Lieutenant Governor D K Joshi has made his case for the Great Nicobar Island Development Project in an opinion column in the Indian Express. The project is a Rs 81,000-92,000 crore plan to turn India's southernmost island into a global maritime and strategic hub. Joshi calls it a strategic test for the country, and says it should not be read as simply an infrastructure scheme.
His argument starts with geography. Nations today, he writes, are judged less by the size of their economies or the strength of their armies than by whether they can read geography, anticipate the future and act before an opportunity becomes a vulnerability. Great Nicobar, in his telling, is one of India's most important strategic windows to the world. The question, he says, is whether India is ready to convert a rare geographical advantage into greater Comprehensive National Power.
Joshi places this in a longer history. For centuries the Indian Ocean shaped India's destiny, carrying its trade, ideas and civilisational influence and, at times, its vulnerabilities. Yet for much of the period after Independence, he writes, India's strategic imagination remained heavily continental. Viewed from the high seas, he argues, the importance of Great Nicobar becomes clearer. He describes the Indian Ocean as an increasingly crowded arena where energy flows, container traffic, naval deployments, island facilities, undersea cables and maritime surveillance are part of a larger contest.
He also points to Thailand. Bangkok has shelved a decades-old proposal for a canal linking the Andaman Sea to the Gulf of Thailand. In its place, Joshi writes, a 90 km overland multi-modal land bridge awaits final approval. It would connect two newly designed deep-sea ports along the 10th parallel, one at Ranong on the Andaman Sea and one at Chumphon on the Gulf of Thailand. The plan also includes dual-track high-speed rail, multi-lane roads, oil and gas pipelines and an air-digital grid. Taken together, he says, these developments redefine the Indo-Pacific trade route and shift the economic centre of gravity to the Andaman basin.
Against that backdrop, Joshi says powerful countries across the Indian Ocean region are steadily expanding their presence through ports, logistics arrangements, maritime access facilities, naval assets, surveillance systems and economic corridors. India's answer, he writes, must be strategic consolidation. Sovereignty, in his view, is strengthened when territory is connected, inhabited, serviced, productive and strategically usable. He says the International Container Transshipment Port, the greenfield airport, the township and the power plant would together create the ecosystem India needs for a credible, sustained and multidimensional presence at a decisive maritime location.
The project is politically contested. During a visit to the island in April, Congress leader Rahul Gandhi accused the government of committing a "crime against natural and tribal heritage". The Centre responded on May 1 with a detailed defence of the project that stressed its strategic importance. In February 2026, the National Green Tribunal cleared the project.
Joshi acknowledges that Great Nicobar is environmentally sensitive. Any project of this scale, he writes, must be carried out with ecological care, legal compliance, scientific monitoring and genuine mitigation. But he adds that ecological sensitivity cannot become a permanent veto on strategic thinking. The challenge, as he frames it, is to pursue national security with ecological responsibility.
The column is an opinion piece by the official who administers the islands, not a new policy announcement. What to watch is how the promised safeguards and the concerns over tribal heritage are handled as the project moves into implementation.
Citazioni salienti
The proposed development is a strategic test of whether India is prepared to convert a rare geographical advantage to further bolster its Comprehensive National Power.— D K Joshi, Andaman and Nicobar Lieutenant Governor
The challenge is to pursue national security with ecological responsibility.— D K Joshi, Andaman and Nicobar Lieutenant Governor