Amazon bets big on small nuclear reactors to power data centers

Data centers need power twenty-four hours a day, every day.
Amazon and Google are turning to nuclear reactors because renewable energy cannot meet the constant power demands of their operations.
Mark

Why is Amazon suddenly so interested in nuclear power? Don't they already have renewable energy deals?

Mimi

They do, but renewables have a fundamental limitation for data centers. Solar and wind only work when the sun shines or the wind blows. Data centers need power twenty-four hours a day, every day. Nuclear solves that problem.

Mark

So this is really about reliability, not just climate goals?

Mimi

It's both. Amazon made public climate commitments, and they're struggling to meet them. Nuclear lets them claim carbon-free electricity while keeping the lights on constantly. It's the only technology that does both at scale.

Mark

These small reactors sound like a new thing. Are they proven?

Mimi

Not really. The first design was certified by regulators just last year. NuScale, the company behind it, actually abandoned its demonstration project because costs got too high. So Amazon is betting on technology that hasn't been built at commercial scale yet.

Mark

What could go wrong?

Mimi

Regulatory delays, cost overruns, public opposition, waste storage questions. And if NuScale's experience is any guide, the economics might not work out the way Amazon is projecting. But the company is clearly willing to take that risk.

Mark

Is this just Amazon, or are other tech companies doing this too?

Mimi

Google just announced a similar deal two days before Amazon. This is becoming a trend among the biggest tech companies. They're all facing the same problem: they need enormous amounts of reliable power, and renewables alone won't cut it.

Mark

What do environmental groups think?

Mimi

They're skeptical. They worry about uranium mining, reactor safety, and radioactive waste. They'd rather see tech companies invest in efficiency and more renewable capacity instead of betting on unproven nuclear technology.

  • Data centers consume electricity without pause, and the gap between what renewables can reliably deliver and what AI-driven infrastructure demands has become impossible to ignore.
  • Amazon's three separate nuclear agreements — with Energy Northwest, X-energy, and Dominion Energy — represent the most ambitious commercial SMR deployment target yet announced, aiming for 5,000 megawatts by 2039.
  • The industry's credibility took a serious blow when NuScale, the only NRC-certified SMR designer, abandoned its demonstration plant in 2023 after costs spiraled out of control, leaving the economics of small modular reactors still unproven.
  • Environmental advocates are pushing back, arguing that efficiency improvements and expanded renewables remain more responsible paths than reviving nuclear supply chains entangled with uranium mining and unresolved waste storage.
  • Regulatory approval, community acceptance, and construction timelines now stand as the gatekeepers between Amazon's announced ambitions and any actual megawatt delivered to a server rack.

As the appetite for computational power grows insatiable, Amazon has turned to one of humanity's oldest and most contested energy sources — the atom — signing three agreements to develop small modular nuclear reactors capable of generating up to 960 megawatts of continuous, carbon-free electricity. The move, following a similar announcement by Google, reflects a growing conviction among the world's largest technology companies that renewable energy alone cannot sustain the infrastructure civilization is increasingly building its future upon. It is a wager on an unproven industrial scale, placed at the intersection of climate ambition, regulatory uncertainty, and the relentless energy demands of the digital age.

Amazon has placed a significant bet on nuclear power, unveiling three separate agreements to develop small modular reactors — compact facilities designed to operate at one-tenth to one-quarter the scale of conventional nuclear plants. The announcement follows a similar move by Google and reflects a shared conviction among major technology companies that solar and wind energy, intermittent by nature, cannot alone sustain the continuous, enormous power demands of modern data centers.

The most substantial agreement pairs Amazon with Energy Northwest, a Washington state public utilities consortium, to fund feasibility work for four SMRs near an existing nuclear facility in Richland. Those initial units would generate 320 megawatts, with an option to expand to twelve reactors producing up to 960 megawatts by the early 2030s. Amazon is also anchoring a $500 million investment round in X-energy, the startup designing the reactors, to complete engineering work, secure regulatory approval, and build a fuel fabrication facility in Tennessee. Together, Amazon and X-energy have set a target of deploying more than 5,000 megawatts of SMR capacity across the United States by 2039. A third agreement with Virginia utility Dominion Energy would explore a 300-megawatt SMR near its existing North Anna nuclear station, in a state where electricity demand is projected to double within fifteen years.

The path forward is far from clear. The NRC certified its first SMR design in early 2023, yet NuScale — the company behind that design — abandoned its demonstration plant later that same year when costs proved unmanageable. Regulatory timelines remain uncertain, the economics of small-scale nuclear construction are still unproven at commercial scale, and environmental groups continue to argue that efficiency gains and renewable expansion represent more responsible alternatives. What Amazon and Google have made plain is their belief that nuclear energy is indispensable to their future. Whether the industry can deliver on that belief before the weight of cost and regulation collapses the ambition remains the defining question.

Amazon is betting heavily on nuclear power to keep its data centers running. On the heels of Google's announcement of its own nuclear deal, Amazon unveiled three separate agreements to develop small modular reactors—compact nuclear plants that operate at a fraction of the size and cost of traditional facilities. The company is making a calculated wager that these smaller reactors can deliver the reliable, carbon-free electricity its sprawling infrastructure demands while helping it meet climate commitments that have grown harder to keep.

Small modular reactors, or SMRs, are designed to be one-tenth to one-quarter the size of conventional nuclear power plants. This matters because data centers run continuously, consuming enormous amounts of power regardless of weather or time of day—a problem that solar and wind farms cannot solve alone. Unlike renewables, nuclear reactors generate electricity around the clock, making them attractive to companies trying to decarbonize while maintaining the computational capacity their services require.

The first agreement pairs Amazon with Energy Northwest, a consortium of public utilities in Washington state. Under the deal, Amazon will fund the initial feasibility work for four small modular reactors to be built near an existing nuclear facility in Richland by the early 2030s. The first four units would generate 320 megawatts of power—enough, Amazon claims, to supply electricity to 770,000 American homes. The agreement includes an option to expand the site to twelve reactors producing up to 960 megawatts, with surplus power available to other regional customers. Energy Northwest will own and operate the reactors; Amazon will purchase the electricity.

Amazon is also investing directly in X-energy, a startup developing advanced reactor designs expected to be used in the Washington project. The company announced a $500 million financing round anchored by Amazon, money intended to complete the reactor's design, secure regulatory approval, and build a fuel fabrication facility in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. Amazon and X-energy say they plan to deploy more than 5,000 megawatts of new small modular reactor capacity across the United States by 2039—a scale they describe as the largest commercial SMR deployment target yet attempted.

A third agreement involves Dominion Energy, a Virginia utility company, which will explore developing an SMR project near its existing North Anna nuclear station. Virginia has become a hub for data center construction, and Dominion projects that electricity demand in the state will double over the next fifteen years. An SMR facility there could generate 300 megawatts if approved and built.

But these projects face real obstacles. The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission certified its first small modular reactor design in January 2023, a design from NuScale Power. Yet by November of that year, NuScale abandoned plans for a demonstration plant after costs spiraled beyond what the company could manage. Regulatory approval remains uncertain, and the economics of building new nuclear capacity—even at smaller scales—remain unproven. Environmental advocates have also raised concerns about uranium mining, enrichment, and the long-term storage of radioactive waste, arguing that tech companies should instead prioritize making data centers more efficient and powering them with renewable energy sources.

What Amazon and Google are signaling is clear: they believe nuclear energy, particularly in modular form, is essential to their future. Whether regulators, communities, and the market will agree remains an open question. The next few years will determine whether these ambitious timelines hold or whether the SMR industry faces the same cost pressures that derailed NuScale's plans.

It's time for Big Tech to recommit to solutions that work and pose less risk to our environment and health, including making data centers as energy efficient as possible and committing them to be powered by new renewable energy sources.
— Johanna Neumann, senior director at the Environment America Research & Policy Center
Quer a matéria completa? Leia o original em The Verge ↗
Fale Conosco FAQ