In a Sydney courtroom, veteran broadcaster Alan Jones faces twenty counts of indecent assault spanning nearly two decades, as one of six male complainants offers testimony that illuminates one of the oldest and most difficult tensions in abuse cases: the way power distorts the meaning of ordinary gestures. The complainant's flirtatious messages, sent years after the alleged assaults, have become the trial's fulcrum — not because they are simple, but because they ask the jury to weigh the complexity of behaviour shaped by proximity to authority against the clarity of what consent actually means
Alan Jones trial hears complainant sent flirtatious texts to 'curry favour'
Complainant alleges repeated indecent assault and non-consensual physical contact by authority figure, causing documented anxiety and discomfort.
I didn't want to say no to Alan Jones
Mark
Why would someone send flirtatious messages to someone they say assaulted them?
Mimi
That's the question the defence is hammering on. But the complainant's answer is that he was managing a power dynamic—trying to stay on Jones's good side, to curry favour. It's about survival in a workplace, not consent.
Mark
Does that explanation hold up?
Mimi
It depends on what you believe about grooming and coercion. The complainant says ten years of this shaped how he behaved. The defence says the messages prove the relationship was consensual. Both can't be true.
Mark
What about the wedding gift and the invitation?
Mimi
That's the hardest part of his testimony. He invited Jones to his wedding, accepted two thousand dollars, thanked him warmly. Those are the actions of someone who values the relationship, not someone who was assaulted by it.
Mark
So the defence is saying the messages and the wedding prove he's lying?
Mimi
Not exactly. They're saying the messages are inconsistent with his account. The complainant counters that they're consistent with someone who's been groomed—who learned to appease, to please, to manage the person with power over him.
Mark
Is there any corroboration for the assaults themselves?
Mimi
One colleague allegedly witnessed an incident at a lunch in Mosman. But most of it comes down to his word against Jones's. The messages become evidence of credibility, which is why they matter so much.
Mark
What happens next?
Mimi
The jury has to decide whether his explanation for the messages is plausible—whether grooming and power imbalance can coexist with flirtation and gratitude. That's the trial.
O Pulso
- A man in his early twenties, working alongside one of Australia's most powerful broadcasters, alleges he was kissed without consent in lifts, touched on his body while driving, and groped at a public lunch — eight times across 2008.
- Years later, in 2015, he sent Jones messages laced with flirtation and warmth, including emojis referencing his own genitals — messages the defence now wields as evidence that the alleged assaults never occurred.
- The complainant's answer cuts to the nerve of the case: he sent those messages to curry favour, not to signal consent, describing a dynamic he characterised as the product of a decade of grooming by an authority figure he felt unable to refuse.
- He attended Jones's requests, invited him to his wedding, accepted a $2,000 gift, and wrote that having Jones present on his wedding day 'means more than you realise' — each act now contested as either evidence of fabrication or evidence of entrapment in a long-held power imbalance.
- Sixteen times the defence put it to him that the assaults never happened; sixteen times he rejected the suggestion — leaving the jury to determine whose account of these years holds.
In a Sydney courtroom, veteran broadcaster Alan Jones faces twenty counts of indecent assault spanning nearly two decades, as one of six male complainants offers testimony that illuminates one of the oldest and most difficult tensions in abuse cases: the way power distorts the meaning of ordinary gestures. The complainant's flirtatious messages, sent years after the alleged assaults, have become the trial's fulcrum — not because they are simple, but because they ask the jury to weigh the complexity of behaviour shaped by proximity to authority against the clarity of what consent actually means.
Alan Jones, the veteran broadcaster, sits before a Sydney court facing twenty counts of indecent assault and two counts of sexual touching, with allegations spanning 2003 to 2020 and involving six male complainants. He has pleaded not guilty to all charges.
This week, one complainant — identified as Complainant C — took the stand to describe a pattern of unwanted physical contact beginning in 2008, when he was in his early twenties and working alongside Jones. He alleged Jones kissed him without consent in the lift of his Circular Quay apartment, touched his crotch while he was driving, and groped him at a Mosman lunch witnessed by a colleague.
The defence, led by barrister Gabrielle Bashir SC, turned to a series of text messages the complainant sent Jones in 2015 — years after the alleged assaults had ceased. In them, he told Jones he was missing him, referenced his own genitals with emoji, and wrote warmly after a meeting that seeing Jones had made him happier at work than he had been in a long time. Bashir pressed him on why a man who claimed to have been assaulted would write such things.
The complainant's answer was direct: he sent the messages because he knew Jones would like them, and because currying favour with Jones felt necessary. He said he felt unable to refuse Jones's requests — not through explicit threat, but through the weight of who Jones was. 'He didn't have a gun to my head, but I didn't want to say no to Alan Jones,' he told the court. He described the messages as consistent with someone who had been groomed over a decade, and said he hated reading them now — though he denied the defence's suggestion that his discomfort stemmed from the messages exposing fabrication.
The court also heard that the complainant invited Jones to his wedding despite reluctance, accepted a $2,000 gift, and thanked Jones in writing for being present on 'a most special day.' The defence characterised this as inconsistent with abuse; the complainant rejected that framing.
Bashir put it to him on at least sixteen occasions that the alleged assaults never happened. Each time, he refused to agree. The trial before Judge Glenn Walsh continues, with the complainant's credibility now at the centre of everything.
Alan Jones, the veteran broadcaster, sits in a Sydney courtroom facing twenty counts of indecent assault and two counts of sexual touching. The allegations span from 2003 to 2020 and involve six male complainants. Jones has pleaded not guilty to all charges. On the stand this week, one of those men—identified in court as Complainant C—described a pattern of unwanted physical contact that began in 2008, when he was in his early twenties and working alongside Jones. He alleged that Jones kissed him without consent multiple times in the lift of his Circular Quay apartment and at work. He said Jones touched his crotch while he was driving. He described a lunch in Mosman where another colleague witnessed Jones grope him. These allegations form the backbone of his testimony.
But the defence has seized on something else: a series of text messages the complainant sent to Jones years later, in 2015, long after the alleged assaults had stopped. Under cross-examination by defence barrister Gabrielle Bashir SC, Complainant C was forced to confront messages he had written himself. In one, he told Jones: "listening to your voice at work, missing you … lots of love always P.S I'm a bachelor again"—a message the complainant acknowledged contained a sexual reference. In another exchange, he sent a winking face emoji and an eggplant emoji, both references to his own genitals. After a meeting with Jones in 2015, he had written: "was so lovely seeing you too. Haven't been this happy with work in a long time … made only better by seeing you today."
When pressed on why he would send such messages to a man he claims assaulted him, Complainant C offered an explanation that cuts to the heart of the case. He said he sent the flirtatious texts because he "knew that he would like it"—that he was trying to curry favour with Jones. When Bashir suggested he was intending to titillate the broadcaster, the complainant resisted the word but acknowledged the intent: "I certainly thought it was a way of carrying favour with him." He also testified that when Jones later asked him to drive him home from work, he felt unable to refuse. "He didn't have a gun to my head, but I didn't want to say no, I didn't want to say no to Alan Jones," he said. The complainant maintained there was no inappropriate behaviour during that car ride, though Jones later sent him a message saying he had wanted to hug him but couldn't because the complainant was about to be married.
The complainant's explanation for the messages—that they were consistent with someone "who had been groomed for 10 years"—frames the central tension of his testimony. He acknowledged sending these messages as an adult, years after the alleged assaults, yet insisted they did not represent genuine affection or consent. He said he hated reading them now, but denied the defence's suggestion that he hated them because they exposed fabrication in his allegations. The court also heard that Complainant C invited Jones to his wedding despite feeling reluctant to do so, and accepted a $2,000 gift from the broadcaster. When he thanked Jones for attending, saying "for you to be there by my side on a most special day means more than you realise," the defence suggested this gratitude was inconsistent with messages from someone alleging abuse. The complainant rejected that characterisation.
Barrister Bashir put it to Complainant C on at least sixteen separate occasions that the alleged assaults never happened. Each time, he rejected the suggestion. The trial before Judge Glenn Walsh continues, with the credibility of the complainant's account now central to whether the jury will accept his allegations of indecent assault spanning more than a decade.
Citações Notáveis
I certainly thought it was a way of carrying favour with him— Complainant C, explaining why he sent flirtatious messages to Jones
He didn't have a gun to my head, but I didn't want to say no, I didn't want to say no to Alan Jones— Complainant C, describing why he agreed to drive Jones home
Quer a matéria completa?
Leia o original em ABC News & Headlines – Australian Broadcasting Corporation ↗
Crime & Justice