Every career carries a moment when the ground shifts beneath it, and for Daniel Ricciardo that moment came in mid-2022, when McLaren let him go and another young Australian stepped into the seat. Alan Jones, a former world champion who has watched many drivers rise and fall, suggests the deeper mystery may be unanswered even for Ricciardo himself. Ahead of the 2023 Australian Grand Prix, Jones weighs the possibility of a comeback against a shrinking map of available drives, reminding readers that the sport's great returns have often come from those who stepped away and waited.
Alan Jones Says Daniel Ricciardo Still Doesn't Know Why He Lost His F1 Seat
Only Daniel knows what he should and shouldn't have done
Jones says Ricciardo doesn't know why he lost his seat. That's a striking claim. What is it based on?
Mostly on Jones's own puzzlement. He says he has tried to analyse it and can't explain why Ricciardo went off the boil. It's an observer's read, not an account from Ricciardo.
Right, and that matters. Jones is guessing at what's in another man's head. Nothing in this piece quotes Ricciardo saying he's baffled.
What do the facts say? Where does Ricciardo stand?
McLaren dropped him in mid-2022 in favour of Oscar Piastri. He's 33, now a Red Bull reserve, and a 2024 return is being contemplated.
Jones cites Alonso and Raikkonen as comebacks. Does that settle it?
It shows it's possible, not that it's likely. Both are two examples chosen to support a point, and Jones himself says you never know.
He also says the real problem is the lack of seats. Red Bull and Ferrari seem set, and Hamilton wouldn't move without a good team.
And the Haas and Williams offers?
Those are described only as reported. Jones doesn't confirm them, and he's careful to say only Ricciardo knows what he should have done.
He also suggests Ricciardo may simply have needed the rest, which is speculation too, but a generous one.
So what should a reader take from it?
That it's an informed opinion from a champion, not new reporting. The open question is whether any 2024 seat exists for him.
Le Pouls
- Daniel Ricciardo lost his McLaren seat in mid-2022 and now sits as a Red Bull reserve, with no race drive secured for 2023.
- Alan Jones doubts Ricciardo fully understands what went wrong, and the uncertainty hangs over his future like an unfinished sentence.
- Few top teams have open seats, so the path back narrows to a handful of doors that may never open.
- Jones points to Alonso and Raikkonen as proof that a comeback is possible, while Oscar Piastri's rise at McLaren keeps the Australian spotlight burning.
Every career carries a moment when the ground shifts beneath it, and for Daniel Ricciardo that moment came in mid-2022, when McLaren let him go and another young Australian stepped into the seat. Alan Jones, a former world champion who has watched many drivers rise and fall, suggests the deeper mystery may be unanswered even for Ricciardo himself. Ahead of the 2023 Australian Grand Prix, Jones weighs the possibility of a comeback against a shrinking map of available drives, reminding readers that the sport's great returns have often come from those who stepped away and waited.
Ahead of the 2023 Australian Grand Prix, Alan Jones offered a candid view of Daniel Ricciardo's situation. He doesn't believe Ricciardo fully knows why things unravelled at McLaren, where he was replaced by Oscar Piastri in mid-2022 and left without a race seat for 2023.
Ricciardo has since returned to Red Bull as a reserve driver, the team that gave him much of his success. A 2024 comeback is being considered, but Jones sees a tight market: he cannot imagine Red Bull, Ferrari or Mercedes making room, so the number of doors is small. Still, he refuses to rule a return out, pointing to Fernando Alonso and Kimi Raikkonen, who each stepped away and came back strongly.
Jones also praised Piastri, arguing that McLaren's problems lie with the car rather than the driver, and that the team's new wind tunnel gives it real hope. He touched on the wider Australian presence in motorsport, including Jack Doohan's F2 campaign, and on F1 matters such as free practice and the consistency of enforcement.
Ahead of the 2023 Australian Grand Prix, Alan Jones, the 1980 Formula One World Champion, offered a blunt assessment of Daniel Ricciardo's situation: he doesn't think Ricciardo knows why it went wrong. Jones, who appears on Channel 10's free-to-air coverage of the race, said he has tried to analyse it himself and cannot explain why Ricciardo went off the boil.
The background is familiar. Ricciardo was sacked by McLaren in mid-2022, with countryman Oscar Piastri taking his place. At 33, that left him without a race seat for 2023. He has since returned to Red Bull, the team that gave him the most success of his career, as reserve driver. A comeback in 2024 is being contemplated, but his future is, in the article's words, up in the air.
Jones did not rule a return out. You never say never, he said, and a reserve driver coming out of a sabbatical can surprise people. He pointed to two precedents. Fernando Alonso left F1 at the end of 2018 after a turbulent spell at a struggling McLaren, raced IndyCar with McLaren's American arm and entered the Dakar Rally with Toyota, then came back in 2021 with Alpine, then known as Renault. He is now at Aston Martin, where he has spearheaded a surge that has seen the Silverstone team beat the Mercedes factory squad, which supplies its power units, at almost every stage this season.
Kimi Raikkonen left Ferrari in 2009 and could not land a drive with another top team for 2010, turning down an offer from Toyota. He went rallying full-time with Citroen, finishing 10th in both his seasons, then raced for Kyle Busch Motorsports in NASCAR's Truck Series and the second-tier Nationwide Series. He returned in 2012 with Lotus, now Alpine, followed by five years at Ferrari and three at Alfa Romeo before retiring in 2021. Jones said that if Ricciardo came back, he thinks he would be quite good.
The obstacle, in Jones's view, is where he would go. He cannot see Red Bull dropping the two drivers it has, or Ferrari dropping Sainz and Leclerc. Lewis Hamilton, he said, would not move unless it was to a good team. So there are not many doors for Ricciardo to go through. Asked whether Ricciardo should have accepted reported offers from smaller teams such as Haas or Williams, Jones declined to judge. The only person who knows what he should have done, he said, is Daniel, and nobody else knows his state of mind at the time; he may have badly needed the rest. Williams, he added, was no great shake, and he thinks Ricciardo probably did the right thing.
Of Piastri, the boy from Oakleigh, Jones was glowing. He said Piastri improves his stock every time he goes out, that the problem at McLaren is the car and not the driver, and that people in F1 know it. Piastri may not win a Grand Prix or a title in the next year or so, Jones said, but if he keeps this up he is well placed for a competitive drive if McLaren doesn't come good. He was optimistic about McLaren, though, which won a messy public fight for Piastri's signature last year. The team has just opened a new and very expensive wind tunnel, and Jones said it has the facilities and personnel to build a very good car. Ferrari, he noted, has a reputation for snatching defeat from the jaws of victory, while Aston Martin has shown that a new facility, a new wind tunnel and the right people can produce a race-winning car.
Jones also spoke about the wider Australian picture. Three Australians are on the grid in a racing or reserve role, with two more in Formula 3. He named Jack Doohan, 20, son of five-time motorcycle world champion Mick Doohan, who races in Formula 2 for Alpine and is also its reserve F1 driver, and Tommy Smith and Hugh Barter in F3. He said Mick has been fantastically supportive, but that Alpine's boss was unwise to say publicly that the team expects Jack to win the F2 title. That, Jones said, puts undue pressure on the kid, though he rates Doohan's chances.
On F1 itself, Jones, 76, criticised Stefano Domenicali's suggestion that free practice might be scrapped, saying drivers need track time and that cutting it would push everyone into simulators. He said Michael Masi did nothing wrong in the 2021 season finale and was attacked unfairly, and clarified that his complaint concerns inconsistent day-to-day enforcement: crossing the white line is fine one day and not the next, and penalties vary from five grid places to the back of the grid. The Australian Grand Prix is on Sunday, April 2.
Citations marquantes
I don't think Daniel knows himself to be honest. I've tried to analyse it. I don't know why he went off the boil.— Alan Jones
The only bloke that really knows what he should and shouldn't have done is Daniel.— Alan Jones