Some wars end with a signed page and others end with a sentence spoken into a microphone, and the Iran conflict, now eight months old, seems to be drifting toward the second kind. In the days after American voters punished Republicans at the midterms, the president has cast the fighting as militarily finished while also keeping the threat of renewed force close at hand, leaving Qatari mediators and Gulf shipping interests to wait on a message that keeps changing. The fate of the Strait of Hormuz, the narrow passage through which the region's oil and gas must travel, now hangs on whether a lead
After Midterm Losses, Trump's Shifting Iran Rhetoric Leaves Mideast Diplomacy in Limbo
Trump has backed away from both more strikes and more talks
Mark
Why does the Vance post matter so much? It's just one message.
Mimi
Because Vance was the negotiator in the earlier talks and was reportedly weighing reengagement. Telling him to focus on anti-fraud work left mediators asking whether diplomacy was being shelved.
Luke
Careful, though. The reengagement and Trump's belief that Iran wasn't acting in good faith come from one anonymous person. It's not on the record.
Mark
And the diplomats? Do they agree on what Trump meant?
Mimi
They agree it's limbo. One said mediation was on track after the Qatari meeting, the other called it a holding pattern.
Luke
Neither knows if he's quitting or posturing after the midterms. That's the real gap, and the reporting doesn't close it.
Mark
Rubio says economic pressure makes strikes unnecessary. Is that the strategy?
Mimi
It's the stated one, and analyst Michael Singh calls it the most sensible path: blockade, patience, mediators working.
Luke
Rubio's claim that Iran's economy is collapsing is his assertion here, not something the piece independently verifies.
Mark
What about the strait itself?
Mimi
Shipments are near prewar levels, but the U.N. counted October as the worst month for incidents against ships since February.
Luke
So Trump's confidence about declaring victory is secondhand too. It's attributed to that same unnamed person.
Le Pouls
- Trump tells reporters new major strikes on Iran are unlikely, then warns he would not hesitate to act if talks fail.
- He declares the U.S. no longer needs a deal with Tehran and steers Vice President Vance away from the negotiating table, unsettling mediators.
- Qatar keeps pushing an interim agreement to reopen Hormuz traffic, but diplomats describe the effort as a holding pattern.
- Ship incidents in the strait hit their highest monthly count since February, even as oil flows near prewar levels.
- Iran refuses nuclear talks until core ceasefire conditions are met, while the U.N. hears warnings of a decisive response to any renewed bombing.
Some wars end with a signed page and others end with a sentence spoken into a microphone, and the Iran conflict, now eight months old, seems to be drifting toward the second kind. In the days after American voters punished Republicans at the midterms, the president has cast the fighting as militarily finished while also keeping the threat of renewed force close at hand, leaving Qatari mediators and Gulf shipping interests to wait on a message that keeps changing. The fate of the Strait of Hormuz, the narrow passage through which the region's oil and gas must travel, now hangs on whether a leader's shifting moods can settle into a durable choice before the next summit in Shenzhen.
In the week since Republicans suffered heavy losses in the midterm elections, President Donald Trump has offered a shifting account of the Iran war. He has stepped back from new strikes and from further talks with Iranian negotiators, in a conflict now eight months old. The day after the election, he acknowledged the war and the economic turmoil it brought had hurt his party at the polls, but insisted it was still the right course. Early in the week, after meeting Qatar's prime minister at the White House, he said the war was militarily effectively over and new major strikes were highly unlikely.
By Thursday his tone had changed. He suggested there was no need to rush toward an endgame and said the United States no longer needed a deal with Tehran. He also told Vice President JD Vance to focus on a domestic anti-fraud campaign, a move that came after Vance had reportedly been weighing renewed contact with Iranian negotiators. Trump kept warning that the military was locked and loaded and watching Pickaxe Mountain, a site tied to Iran's nuclear program.
Mediators, who had felt the talks were on track, were left uncertain. Qatar still seeks an interim agreement to restore traffic through the Strait of Hormuz, though the effort has become a holding pattern. Iran will not discuss its nuclear program until Washington accepts its ceasefire conditions, and its U.N. envoy said Tehran has never closed the door to diplomacy while promising a decisive response to any renewed bombing. Analysts expect the standoff to persist, and the next test of which Trump message will hold comes at the Asia trip and APEC meetings in Shenzhen.
In the week since Republicans took a beating in the midterm elections, President Donald Trump has said a great deal about where the Iran war goes from here, and not all of it points the same way. Through exchanges with reporters, broadcast interviews and social media posts, he has stepped back from further strikes and, at the same time, from more talks with Iranian negotiators on ending a conflict now eight months old.
The day after the election, Trump acknowledged that the war, and the global economic turmoil that came with it, had partly cost his party at the polls. He maintained it was still the right thing to do. At the start of this week he met at the White House with Qatar's prime minister, then told reporters he thought it highly unlikely he would need to order new major strikes. The war, he said, "militarily is effectively over."
By Thursday the tone had shifted again. He questioned whether he had to hurry toward an endgame and declared that the United States no longer needs a deal with Tehran. In a social media post he told Vice President JD Vance, his chief negotiator in the earlier peace talks, to give his "complete and total attention" to the administration's domestic anti-fraud campaign. Throughout, Trump warned that the U.S. military is "locked and loaded" and watching Pickaxe Mountain, a site linked to Iran's nuclear program, for signs of activity. "If something does not work out, I would not hesitate" to act, he told conservative broadcaster Hugh Hewitt.
Two Middle East diplomats familiar with the process, speaking anonymously because of its sensitivity, said the mediation had looked on track after the Qatari prime minister's visit. Thursday's post changed that. One wondered why Trump seemed to be sidelining Vance, who was skeptical about launching the war but ultimately backed it. According to a person familiar with the matter, Vance had been weighing renewed contact with senior Iranian negotiators. Trump, aware of this, posted the morning after The Wall Street Journal reported Vance's thinking, because he believed the Iranians were not acting in good faith.
Qatar, the chief mediator, is still working toward an interim agreement that would restore traffic through the Strait of Hormuz, the passage for oil and natural gas leaving the Persian Gulf, while keeping the door open to further U.S.-Iran discussions. The second diplomat described the effort as a holding pattern, with mediators and Iranians alike unsure whether Trump was abandoning a negotiated settlement or posturing after midterms that cost his party control of Congress.
The same person familiar with the matter said Trump is increasingly confident he can credibly claim his military goals are met. With oil shipments through the strait near prewar levels, he might leave it to Gulf countries to negotiate with Iran over governing the waterway. Yet passage remains dangerous: the United Nations reports October saw the most incidents against commercial ships there since February.
Iran, for its part, will not discuss its nuclear program until Washington accepts several core conditions it wants in any ceasefire. The nuclear question remains the thorniest, and Trump insists it be settled in any deal. Iran's deputy U.N. ambassador, Gholamhossein Darzi, told the Security Council on Friday that Iran "has never closed the door to diplomacy," but warned of "an immediate and decisive response" if the U.S. or Israel resumed bombing.
The White House declined to comment directly on Trump's postelection remarks. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the economic pain being inflicted on Iran is so great that military action is unnecessary. Earlier in the week he said the U.S. does not oppose mediators continuing, adding: "If there's a deal to be done, the president will be the first one to be in favor of it. But it's not going to be a stupid deal." Democratic Sen. Cory Booker of New Jersey, speaking in Denver at his party's postelection gathering, called Trump "an arsonist who has set ablaze our foreign policy" who now wants to walk away.
Michael Singh of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy expects the stalemate over Hormuz and the monthslong U.S. naval blockade of Iranian crude to continue. He called patience and pressure the most sensible course, with senior officials like Vance engaged only when the time is right. Next week's trip to the Philippines and the APEC meetings in Shenzhen, including a planned three-way summit with Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin where Iran and nuclear stockpiles are expected on the agenda, will be the next test of which Trump message holds.
Citations marquantes
The economic pain that we are inflicting on that regime is so great that there's no need for military action.— Secretary of State Marco Rubio
Iran has never closed the door to diplomacy.— Gholamhossein Darzi, Iran's deputy U.N. ambassador
Envie de l'histoire complète ?
Lire l'original sur Santa Rosa Press Democrat ↗