In a vote that carries the weight of centuries, 164 nations at the United Nations endorsed a shift away from the Mercator projection—a 16th-century cartographic standard that has long rendered Africa smaller than it truly is—toward equal-area maps that more faithfully represent the continent's geographic reality. The resolution, championed by African nations, is not merely a technical correction but a philosophical one: a reckoning with who has held the power to define the world's shape, and whose truths have been quietly distorted in the process. Across classrooms, media campaigns, and cultur
Africa's Decolonization Push: Maps, Schools, and Narratives Redrawn
A country without its own history is a country without direction
So the UN voted to change how maps are drawn. That sounds symbolic. Does it actually change anything?
It changes what people see every day. The Mercator projection makes Africa look smaller than it is—roughly 30 percent smaller. When a child opens a textbook or looks at a globe, they're absorbing a false sense of scale. The resolution encourages equal-area projections instead. It's not binding, but 164 countries voting for it sends a signal.
But here's the thing—the US rejected it, and the US is where most of the world's map software is made. Google Maps, for instance, still uses Web Mercator. So how much does a UN resolution actually shift practice?
That's fair. The resolution is more about legitimacy and momentum. It gives African governments and institutions permission to adopt different projections in their own schools and media. It's a symbolic victory that can become material change over time.
And the curriculum changes in Mali and Tanzania—are those connected to the map resolution, or separate?
Separate, but part of the same impulse. Mali removed French history from schools in October 2025. It's tied to Mali's break with France militarily and politically. But the underlying logic is the same: who gets to define what knowledge matters, and from whose perspective?
I want to be careful here. Mali's government is military-led. Is this decolonization, or is it nationalist curriculum reform that happens to use decolonization language? Those aren't the same thing.
That's a real tension. The historian quoted in the piece, Philemon Mtoi, seems aware of it. He says you need to know your own history first, but you shouldn't erase knowledge of other places. He's arguing for a rebalancing, not a replacement.
What about the #NotWaiting campaign and the $4.2 billion figure? That's a striking claim.
Africa No Filter says biased media coverage costs the continent $4.2 billion annually in inflated interest payments. The logic is that negative stereotypes make investors and lenders perceive higher risk, so they charge more. It's plausible but hard to isolate causally.
Right. That figure comes from a single report by the organization running the campaign. It's not independently verified. It's worth noting as their estimate, not as established fact.
Fair point. But the underlying observation—that media narratives shape economic behavior—is sound. The campaign itself is straightforward: show positive stories from Africa, center African voices, counter the crisis narrative.
Is that enough? Can a social media campaign really shift how the world sees a continent?
Probably not alone. But it's part of a larger shift. Maps, curricula, media narratives—they're all reinforcing each other. The idea is that if you change how knowledge is organized and presented, you change what people believe is possible.
Le Pouls
- A 164-to-1 UN vote to retire the Mercator projection signals that the politics of representation have finally reached the mapmaker's table.
- The lone dissenting vote—cast by the United States under a president who has renamed bodies of water by executive order—underscores how deeply cartography remains entangled with national power and ego.
- Mali's removal of French history from school curricula, Tanzania's mandate for Swahili-taught local history, and similar reforms across the continent are dismantling colonial knowledge structures one syllabus at a time.
- Biased international media coverage is not merely a matter of perception—Africa No Filter estimates it costs the continent $4.2 billion annually in inflated borrowing costs, making narrative distortion a measurable economic injury.
- The #NotWaiting campaign is redirecting the lens inward, centering African entrepreneurs, innovators, and community builders to counter an internalized image of helplessness that has taken root even among Africans themselves.
- What is landing is not a single resolution but a convergence—maps, curricula, and media campaigns aligning around a shared insistence that Africa's scale, history, and agency can no longer be edited out of the world's story.
In a vote that carries the weight of centuries, 164 nations at the United Nations endorsed a shift away from the Mercator projection—a 16th-century cartographic standard that has long rendered Africa smaller than it truly is—toward equal-area maps that more faithfully represent the continent's geographic reality. The resolution, championed by African nations, is not merely a technical correction but a philosophical one: a reckoning with who has held the power to define the world's shape, and whose truths have been quietly distorted in the process. Across classrooms, media campaigns, and cultural institutions, Africa is engaged in a broader act of reclamation—not of territory, but of narrative, identity, and the right to be seen whole.
In early September, the United Nations General Assembly voted 164 to 1 to endorse equal-area map projections—most notably the Equal Earth projection—as a replacement for the Mercator standard that has dominated global cartography since the 16th century. The Mercator projection, though useful for navigation, systematically shrinks landmasses near the equator, leaving Africa visually diminished for generations of schoolchildren and policymakers alike. Togo's foreign minister Robert Dussey, who drove the Correct the Map campaign, called the vote a moment of vindication: Africa's place in the community of nations, he argued, has never matched its true historical, geographic, or economic reality. The sole dissenting vote came from the United States.
For those behind the resolution, cartography was never a purely technical matter. It was always about power—about who defines the categories through which the world is understood. Historian Romain Tiquet of the African Worlds Institute in Paris noted that questions of knowledge decolonization have been gaining momentum since the late 2000s, moving through universities, museums, and cultural institutions. The map debate, he observed, is inseparable from those deeper questions.
In Mali, the reckoning has entered the classroom directly. In October 2025, the government removed French history from its curriculum—including the French Revolution—replacing it with Malian history and the study of ancient West African kingdoms. The move followed Mali's 2022 break with France and its subsequent formation of the Alliance of Sahel States with Burkina Faso and Niger. Tanzanian historian Philemon Mtoi defended the shift: a nation without a grounded understanding of its own history, he said, lacks direction. Tanzania, Ghana, Namibia, South Africa, and Kenya have undertaken similar reforms, with Tanzania making local history and ethics compulsory in Swahili—not to erase global knowledge, but to establish a foundation in one's own story first.
Beyond schools, Africa No Filter is working to reshape the continent's image in international media. The nonprofit estimates that stereotyped coverage—portraying Africa as poor, corrupt, and crisis-prone—costs the continent up to $4.2 billion annually in inflated interest rates. Its #NotWaiting campaign responds by centering African voices: entrepreneurs, innovators, and community builders across all 54 countries who are not waiting for external validation. Officer Francois Bouda noted that the campaign is aimed first at Africans themselves, many of whom have internalized a diminished self-image. The goal is not to deny real challenges, but to make visible what international media has long overlooked—the agency, creativity, and momentum that have always been present.
In early September, the United Nations General Assembly voted 164 to 1 to endorse a shift in how the world's maps should be drawn. The resolution, championed by African nations and backed by the African Union, calls for the adoption of equal-area map projections—most notably the Equal Earth projection—to replace the Mercator projection, a cartographic standard that has dominated global mapmaking since the 16th century. The Mercator projection, while useful for navigation, systematically distorts the size of landmasses near the equator, rendering Africa substantially smaller than it actually is. For centuries, this visual misrepresentation has shaped how people around the world perceive the continent's true geographic and economic scale.
Robert Dussey, Togo's foreign minister and the driving force behind the Correct the Map campaign, described the vote as a moment of vindication. "Finally, Africa is fighting to regain its place in the community of nations," he told Deutsche Welle. "The place it has been reserved to this day is unfair. It does not correspond to Africa's reality, not in historical, geographical or economic terms." For Dussey and the nations that backed the resolution, the debate over cartography was never merely technical. It was fundamentally about power—about who decides how the world is represented, and whose perspective shapes the categories through which knowledge itself is organized. The single dissenting vote came from the United States, whose president Donald Trump has pursued his own cartographic ambitions through executive order, renaming the Gulf of Mexico as the Gulf of America and Lake Ontario as Lake America.
The map resolution sits within a much larger movement across Africa to reclaim narratives and knowledge systems from colonial influence. Romain Tiquet, a historian at the African Worlds Institute in Paris, noted that since the late 2000s, questions about the decolonization of knowledge have gained momentum in universities, museums, and cultural institutions worldwide. "Who established the categories through which we conceptualize the world? From which locations? And what power dynamics result from this?" Tiquet asked. Cartography, he explained, is inseparable from these questions.
In Mali, this reckoning has taken concrete form in the classroom. In October 2025, the Malian government removed French history from its school curriculum, eliminating instruction on the French Revolution in favor of a focus on Malian history and the ancient West African kingdoms that preceded colonial rule. The decision reflects a broader political realignment: Mali ended military cooperation with France in 2022, and French troops subsequently withdrew. Burkina Faso and Niger followed suit, and the three nations formed the Alliance of Sahel States in 2023. Philemon Mtoi, a historian at Tumaini University Makumira in Tanzania, defended Mali's curricular shift as strategically sound. "A country without a strong understanding of its own history is like a country without clear leadership and direction," he said. By investing in the research and preservation of African history from an African perspective, Mali was not merely performing an act of decolonization—it was claiming intellectual independence and contributing to global scholarship in a way that had long been denied.
Tanzania, Ghana, Namibia, South Africa, and Kenya have undertaken similar curriculum reforms. Tanzania recently made Tanzanian history and ethics a compulsory subject taught in Swahili, replacing global history in the standard sequence. Mtoi cautioned, however, that the goal was not to erase knowledge of other nations or historical events. Rather, it was to establish a foundation in one's own history first, with the study of global events like the French Revolution deferred to later stages of education. The shift reflects a conviction that intellectual independence begins with understanding oneself.
Beyond the classroom, organizations like Africa No Filter are working to reshape how the continent is portrayed in media and public discourse. The nonprofit, which helped organize the Correct the Map campaign, released a report titled "The cost of media stereotypes to Africa," estimating that the continent loses up to $4.2 billion annually in inflated interest payments due to biased media coverage that portrays Africa as poor, corrupt, and perpetually crisis-ridden. To counter this narrative, Africa No Filter launched the #NotWaiting campaign, which aims to highlight positive developments and initiatives across the continent while centering African voices and perspectives. Francois Bouda, an officer for arts and culture at the organization, emphasized that the campaign is directed first at Africans themselves. "We've accepted the image of a continent incapable of taking care of itself, one that is poor and has no opportunities. We've internalized this and come to believe it, even though many positive things are happening," he said. The campaign features stories of people across Africa's 54 countries—entrepreneurs, innovators, community builders—who are not waiting for external validation or direction. "Millions of ordinary people doing extraordinary things every day," as one promotional video describes it. The work is not about erasing Africa's real challenges, but about making visible what has always been there: the agency, creativity, and progress that international media has systematically overlooked.
Citations marquantes
Finally, Africa is fighting to regain its place in the community of nations. The place it has been reserved to this day is unfair.— Robert Dussey, Foreign Minister of Togo
We've accepted the image of a continent incapable of taking care of itself. We've internalized this and come to believe it, even though many positive things are happening.— Francois Bouda, Africa No Filter