Afghanistan Reportedly Plans Water Restrictions on Pakistan as Regional Tensions Escalate

26 civilians killed in Pahalgam terror attack; 17 people including three Afghan cricketers killed in Pakistani airstrikes on Afghan residential areas.
Pakistan's neighbors are prepared to use water as leverage
Both India and Afghanistan have signaled they will restrict water supplies amid escalating regional tensions.
Mark

Why does water matter so much here? It's not like Pakistan can't buy water elsewhere.

Mimi

Water isn't a commodity you import. It's the foundation of agriculture, drinking water, electricity. The Indus system feeds hundreds of millions of people. You can't replace that with purchases.

Mark

So when India suspended the treaty, what actually changed on the ground?

Mimi

Legally, India removed the constraint that prevented it from building dams upstream. Practically, it signals willingness to use water as a weapon. The threat is as important as the action.

Mark

And Afghanistan doing the same—is that a copycat move, or is there a real grievance there?

Mimi

Both. The airstrikes killed 17 civilians. That's a genuine provocation. But the dam announcement also sends a message: we can hurt you the way India is hurting you. It's leverage.

Mark

The ceasefires seem to have worked. Why are you saying this is still dangerous?

Mimi

Ceasefires stop shooting. They don't restore treaties or resolve why the shooting started. Pakistan is still suspended from the water agreement with India. Afghanistan is still planning dams. The guns are quiet, but the underlying conflict is unchanged.

Mark

What happens if both countries actually build these dams?

Mimi

Millions of people lose access to water. Crops fail. Cities face shortages. It becomes a humanitarian crisis, not just a political one. That's why this matters beyond the region.

  • Pakistan faces simultaneous water pressure from both India and Afghanistan — a convergence of threats with no modern precedent in the region.
  • India suspended the decades-old Indus Waters Treaty after a terror attack killed 26 civilians in Kashmir, removing the legal shield that once prevented upstream water from becoming a geopolitical weapon.
  • Afghan Taliban leadership ordered dam construction on rivers flowing into Pakistan days after Pakistani airstrikes killed 17 people — including three cricketers — in residential areas of Paktika province.
  • Ceasefire agreements brokered in May with India and more recently by Qatar with Afghanistan have paused the violence, but neither has restored the treaties or resolved the disputes driving them.
  • Pakistan's water infrastructure, already under strain from climate change and population growth, now faces a long-horizon threat that military force and short-term diplomacy cannot easily reverse.

Along the ancient waterways that have sustained civilizations for millennia, Pakistan now finds itself caught between two neighbors who have each chosen to speak the language of rivers. Following a deadly terror attack in Kashmir that prompted India to suspend the Indus Waters Treaty, and Pakistani airstrikes in Afghanistan that have moved the Taliban to order dam construction on shared waterways, a nation of hundreds of millions faces the prospect of water itself becoming a weapon. What was once governed by treaty and diplomacy is now subject to the logic of grievance and leverage, raising a question as old as human settlement: what happens when the water stops?

Pakistan is being squeezed from two directions at once — and the pressure point is water.

It began in April, when a terror attack in Pahalgam, Kashmir killed 26 people. The Resistance Front, a militant group linked to the Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Tayyiba, initially claimed responsibility. India responded by suspending the Indus Waters Treaty, a foundational agreement governing water-sharing between the two countries for decades, and launched Operation Sindoor, targeting terrorist infrastructure in Pakistan. The two nations edged toward open conflict before Pakistan's military requested a ceasefire in May, which India accepted.

Before that standoff could fully settle, a second front opened. Afghanistan's Taliban government, under Supreme Leader Mawlawi Hibatullah Akhundzada, announced plans to construct dams on waterways that feed into Pakistan. The announcement came through Afghanistan's Information Ministry, with Minister Mullah Abdul Latif Mansoor declaring on social media that Afghans have the right to manage their own resources. The timing was pointed: just days earlier, Pakistani airstrikes had struck residential areas in Afghanistan's Paktika province, killing 17 people including three cricketers. Qatar subsequently brokered a ceasefire between the two countries, with commitments to further talks.

But ceasefires pause the shooting — they do not restore treaties. The Indus River system sustains Pakistan's agriculture and drinking water for vast populations. With India having removed the legal framework governing upstream water use, and Afghanistan now signaling it will assert similar control, Pakistan faces a threat that operates on a slower and more consequential timeline than any military exchange. Dam construction takes years; the message it sends is immediate.

What makes this moment so precarious is not any single crisis but their simultaneity. Pakistan cannot negotiate or fight its way out of a two-front resource conflict. The question now is whether the fragile ceasefires will hold long enough for diplomacy to reconstruct the frameworks that once kept water from becoming an instrument of war.

Pakistan is facing an unprecedented squeeze on its water supplies from two directions at once. In April, a terror attack in Pahalgam, Kashmir left 26 people dead. The Resistance Front, a militant proxy linked to the Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Tayyiba, initially claimed responsibility before withdrawing the statement. The attack prompted India to suspend the Indus Waters Treaty, a foundational agreement that has governed water-sharing between the two nations for decades. India also launched Operation Sindoor, a military campaign targeting terrorist infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistani-controlled territory. The two countries edged toward open conflict until May 10, when Pakistan's military leadership requested a ceasefire, which was accepted.

Now, as that crisis has cooled to a tense standoff, a second threat has emerged from Afghanistan's eastern border. The Taliban government, under Supreme Leader Mawlawi Hibatullah Akhundzada, has ordered the construction of dams on water bodies that feed into Pakistan. The directive came from Afghanistan's Information Ministry, with the country's Minister Mullah Abdul Latif Mansoor announcing the decision on social media: "Afghans have the right to manage their own." The timing is not coincidental. Just days before the dam announcement, Pakistani airstrikes struck residential areas in Afghanistan's Paktika province, killing 17 people, including three cricketers. The strikes hit the Argun and Barmal districts, causing what witnesses described as significant civilian casualties.

The escalation along the Afghanistan-Pakistan border has been sharp and bloody. The airstrikes prompted international intervention: Qatar announced that both countries had agreed to an immediate ceasefire and committed to follow-up talks aimed at making the truce permanent. But the water restrictions represent a different kind of threat—one that operates on a longer timeline and affects millions of ordinary people rather than military targets.

Water is Pakistan's most precious resource. The Indus River system sustains agriculture across much of the country and provides drinking water to vast populations. The suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty removes the legal framework that has prevented India from weaponizing its upstream position. Now Afghanistan is signaling it will do the same. Dam construction takes time, but the message is clear: Pakistan's neighbors are prepared to use water as leverage in their disputes.

What makes this moment particularly precarious is the simultaneity of the threats. Pakistan is not facing a single crisis it can negotiate or manage through military means. It is caught between two neighbors, each now asserting control over water resources that flow across borders. The ceasefire agreements—one with India announced in May, one with Afghanistan brokered by Qatar—have paused the shooting. But they have not resolved the underlying disputes or restored the treaties that once governed these relationships. Pakistan's water security, already strained by climate change and population growth, now faces pressure from both directions at once. The question is whether the ceasefires will hold long enough for diplomacy to rebuild the frameworks that once kept these resource conflicts from becoming existential threats.

Afghans have the right to manage their own
— Afghan Minister Mullah Abdul Latif Mansoor, announcing the dam construction order
Vuoi la storia completa? Leggi l'originale su Zee News ↗
Contattaci Domande frequenti