As two of cricket's most celebrated batsmen narrow their focus to the one-day format alone, a debate has emerged in India about whether domestic tournaments can substitute for the match rhythm that a sparse international calendar fails to provide. Aakash Chopra, former cricketer and commentator, argues that sending Rohit Sharma and Virat Kohli to the Vijay Hazare Trophy is not a solution but a misdiagnosis — the real ailment being an ODI schedule too thin to keep elite players sharp. The question sits at the intersection of sporting wisdom and modern cricket's fractured calendar, where traditi
Aakash Chopra dismisses Vijay Hazare debate for Rohit, Kohli as 'bogus talk'
Just nine days of cricket action over 100 days of inactivity
Mark
So Chopra is saying the Vijay Hazare Trophy is pointless for Rohit and Kohli. But isn't any cricket better than no cricket?
Mimi
That's the intuitive argument, right? But Chopra's saying the timing makes it useless. They'd play the domestic tournament in November-December, then have a 100-day gap before their next ODI in January. So the tournament doesn't actually prepare them for what comes next.
Luke
Wait—how long is that gap exactly? Is it really 100 days, or is that an estimate? And does Chopra have data on whether domestic cricket actually helps players maintain form during long breaks?
Mimi
He's saying nine ODIs total before the next IPL, spread across October, November, and January. The math on the gap seems right. But you're right—he's not citing studies on whether domestic cricket helps or hurts.
Mark
So the real problem is that India's ODI schedule is just too sparse for these players?
Mimi
Exactly. Chopra's argument isn't really about the Vijay Hazare Trophy itself. It's that with only nine ODIs in that window, no domestic tournament can fill the void. They need more international cricket.
Luke
But both players chose to retire from Tests and T20Is and stay in ODIs. Is Chopra saying that was a mistake, or that the schedule should have been planned differently?
Mimi
He's not saying the retirement decision was wrong. He's saying the consequence is that they're now dependent on a sparse ODI schedule, and domestic cricket can't compensate for that.
Mark
Has anyone from the BCCI or the players themselves responded to this debate?
Luke
The article doesn't mention any response from them. We're only hearing Chopra's position here.
Mimi
Right. So this is one voice in the conversation, not a settled question.
O Pulso
- With both Sharma and Kohli retired from Tests and T20Is, India's ODI-only veterans face stretches of over 100 days without competitive cricket — a silence that alarms those who believe skill erodes in stillness.
- Voices like Sunil Gavaskar have warned that muscle memory fades past thirty, pointing to the players' earlier reluctance to appear in the Duleep Trophy as a troubling precedent.
- Chopra fires back with arithmetic: nine ODIs between now and the next IPL, a Vijay Hazare Trophy wedged awkwardly in November-December, and no logical line connecting domestic 50-over cricket to readiness for international matches months later.
- The Vijay Hazare Trophy, in his reading, cannot patch a wound caused by an international schedule that was never designed to sustain players competing in only one format.
- What remains unresolved is whether cricket's traditional faith in domestic competition still holds when the calendar itself has become the problem — leaving senior players and selectors navigating a preparation strategy with no clean answers.
As two of cricket's most celebrated batsmen narrow their focus to the one-day format alone, a debate has emerged in India about whether domestic tournaments can substitute for the match rhythm that a sparse international calendar fails to provide. Aakash Chopra, former cricketer and commentator, argues that sending Rohit Sharma and Virat Kohli to the Vijay Hazare Trophy is not a solution but a misdiagnosis — the real ailment being an ODI schedule too thin to keep elite players sharp. The question sits at the intersection of sporting wisdom and modern cricket's fractured calendar, where tradition and arithmetic do not always agree.
The question has grown impossible to ignore: should Rohit Sharma and Virat Kohli play in the Vijay Hazare Trophy this November and December? Both men have stepped back from Test cricket and T20 internationals, committing themselves solely to the one-day format — an unusual position that leaves two of India's finest batsmen playing only sporadically. The concern, voiced most prominently by Sunil Gavaskar, is that long gaps between matches erode the muscle memory and sharpness that elite batting demands, particularly as players move through their thirties. When Kohli and Sharma previously declined to feature in the Duleep Trophy, it sharpened that anxiety.
Aakash Chopra, however, dismisses the entire debate as bogus talk, and his reasoning is arithmetical rather than philosophical. India's ODI calendar between now and the next IPL amounts to just nine matches — three each against Australia, South Africa, and New Zealand. The Vijay Hazare Trophy falls in November and December, more than 100 days after the IPL ends, and playing in it would do little to prepare the two batsmen for international cricket in January and beyond. The gap is simply too wide, and a domestic 50-over tournament cannot meaningfully bridge it.
Chopra's deeper point is that the Vijay Hazare Trophy is being asked to solve a problem it did not create. The real issue is that India's ODI schedule is too sparse to keep its senior players in competitive rhythm. Whether domestic cricket can substitute for that rhythm — or whether it is merely another obligation layered onto an already complicated calendar — remains genuinely contested. What the debate reveals, more than any answer it provides, is that the old wisdom about match fitness through domestic cricket was written for a different era, one where the international schedule was not this thin.
The question has become unavoidable: should Rohit Sharma and Virat Kohli play in the Vijay Hazare Trophy this November and December? The debate has grown louder as the tournament approaches, driven by a familiar concern in cricket—that without regular match practice, even the best players lose their edge. But Aakash Chopra, the former Indian cricketer and commentator, has a blunt response to this entire line of thinking: it is, he says, bogus talk.
The backdrop matters. Both Sharma and Kohli have stepped away from Test cricket and the Twenty20 international format, but they remain central to India's one-day cricket plans. This creates an unusual situation: two of the country's most accomplished batsmen are now playing only ODIs, a format that demands its own rhythm and sharpness. The concern, articulated by figures like Sunil Gavaskar in recent columns, is that without consistent match time, their skills will deteriorate. Gavaskar has written about how cricketers' muscle memory begins to fade after their thirties, and he has previously advocated for senior players to compete in domestic tournaments like the Duleep Trophy to maintain their form ahead of important Test series. When Kohli and Sharma declined to play in the Duleep Trophy before India's home series against Bangladesh and New Zealand, it raised eyebrows.
But Chopra's argument cuts through the noise with a simple arithmetic problem. India's ODI schedule between now and the next IPL is skeletal: three matches against Australia in October, three against South Africa in November, and three against New Zealand in January 2026. That is nine ODIs total. The Vijay Hazare Trophy, scheduled for November and December, sits awkwardly in this calendar. Between the end of one IPL season and the start of the next, there will be more than 100 days. During that stretch, Kohli and Sharma would play virtually no cricket at all—neither international matches nor, if they skip the domestic tournament, any competitive cricket whatsoever.
Chopra's point is that the Vijay Hazare Trophy cannot solve this problem. Playing in a domestic 50-over competition in November and December will not meaningfully prepare them for ODIs in January and beyond. The gap is too large, the schedule too sparse. What they need is actual match practice in the format they are playing, and the international calendar simply does not provide enough of it. The domestic tournament becomes, in his view, a distraction from the real issue: India's ODI schedule is too thin to keep its senior players sharp.
The conversation reflects a deeper tension in modern cricket. Players at the end of their careers are being asked to manage multiple formats, multiple schedules, and the physical and mental demands of constant travel. Kohli and Sharma have chosen to focus on ODIs, but that choice comes with a cost—long stretches of inactivity punctuated by brief bursts of international cricket. Whether a domestic tournament can bridge that gap, or whether it is simply another obligation in an already crowded calendar, remains contested. What is clear is that the traditional wisdom about keeping players match-fit through domestic cricket may not apply when the international schedule is this sparse.
Citações Notáveis
The chatter about playing the Vijay Hazare Trophy is bogus talk. There are nine ODIs for India till the next IPL, and that's about it—just nine days of cricket action. You're not playing at all. You're not practising.— Aakash Chopra
Quer a matéria completa?
Leia o original em The Indian Express ↗
Sports