Nearly a quarter-century after nearly 3,000 people perished in the September 11 attacks, a military judge has set June 2028 as the date when Khalid Sheikh Mohammed will finally stand trial — a timeline that speaks less to delay than to the profound difficulty of seeking justice when the evidence itself was gathered through methods the nation has since condemned. Mohammed has been held at Guantanamo Bay since 2006, his case a living archive of the tensions between security, law, and moral reckoning that the attacks unleashed. The long road to this courtroom has wound through revoked plea deals,
9/11 Alleged Mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed's Trial Set for June 2028
Justice delayed by the very methods used to pursue it
Why has this case taken so long? It's been over twenty years.
The torture evidence is the core problem. Everything gathered at the CIA black sites is legally radioactive. The military judges can't just ignore that it happened.
So they could throw out the whole case?
Not the whole case, but major pieces of it. That's what's been holding things up—figuring out what can actually be used in court.
And the plea deal that got revoked—was that a way around the torture problem?
Partly. It would have avoided a trial entirely, avoided having to prove anything in open court. But the Defense Secretary decided that decision was too big to leave to the prosecutors.
Did the families want the plea deal?
Some did, some didn't. That's the thing—there was no real process to ask them. The deal was announced, then killed, and they were caught in the middle.
El Pulso
- A military judge rejected prosecutors' push for a 2027 trial, setting June 5, 2028 as the start date — extending a legal odyssey that has already outlasted most expectations.
- A July 2024 plea deal that would have ended the case with life sentences collapsed within days when Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin revoked it, citing his authority over decisions of such magnitude.
- Families of 9/11 victims, already carrying more than two decades of grief, found themselves sidelined again — some criticizing Austin's intervention, others left waiting for a resolution that keeps receding.
- A federal appeals court upheld Austin's power to revoke the agreement in a 2-1 ruling, closing that legal avenue and forcing the case back toward a full trial.
- At the heart of the delay lies a wound the legal system has not healed: evidence gathered through CIA torture at black sites remains contested, threatening the admissibility of the prosecution's core material.
- When the trial finally opens, it will ask whether justice can be credibly delivered when the road to the courtroom was itself built on compromised ground.
Nearly a quarter-century after nearly 3,000 people perished in the September 11 attacks, a military judge has set June 2028 as the date when Khalid Sheikh Mohammed will finally stand trial — a timeline that speaks less to delay than to the profound difficulty of seeking justice when the evidence itself was gathered through methods the nation has since condemned. Mohammed has been held at Guantanamo Bay since 2006, his case a living archive of the tensions between security, law, and moral reckoning that the attacks unleashed. The long road to this courtroom has wound through revoked plea deals, federal appeals, and unresolved questions about whether coerced testimony can anchor a just verdict.
Khalid Sheikh Mohammed will face trial in June 2028, a military judge decided this week — nearly twenty-five years after the attacks he is accused of orchestrating. Lieutenant Colonel Michael Schrama set the date for June 5, 2028, rejecting prosecutors' request for a 2027 start as premature. Mohammed has been in custody since 2003 and held at Guantanamo Bay since 2006, making his case one of the longest-running prosecutions in American legal history.
The most recent disruption came in July 2024, when Mohammed and two alleged co-conspirators reached a plea agreement with military prosecutors. All three would plead guilty to charges including the murder of 2,976 people in exchange for life sentences rather than execution. The deal seemed to offer resolution to a case that had stalled for years — but it collapsed within days. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin revoked it, arguing that a decision of such consequence required his personal approval. Some 9/11 families criticized the move, feeling excluded from a process that directly concerned them. The Biden administration subsequently asked a federal court to validate Austin's action, and a Washington appeals court agreed in a 2-1 ruling, upholding his authority.
Beneath these procedural battles lies a deeper problem. Mohammed and the other defendants were held at CIA black sites before reaching Guantanamo, and the admissibility of evidence gathered during that period — through interrogation methods the United States has since disavowed — remains unresolved. Military judges have struggled for years with how to build a prosecution when its foundation may rest on coerced testimony.
On September 11, 2001, al-Qaeda hijackers struck the Twin Towers, the Pentagon, and a Pennsylvania field, killing nearly 3,000 people and wounding thousands more. Mohammed has described himself as the operation's architect. For the families who lost loved ones that day, the 2028 trial date means at least two more years of waiting — not because of indifference, but because the case raises questions about whether justice can be fully served when the path to it has been so deeply compromised.
Khalid Sheikh Mohammed will finally face trial in June 2028, a military judge decided this week—nearly a quarter-century after the attacks he is accused of orchestrating. Mohammed has been in custody since his capture in 2003, held at Guantanamo Bay since 2006, making his case one of the longest-running prosecutions in American legal history.
Lieutenant Colonel Michael Schrama set the trial to begin on June 5, 2028, rejecting prosecutors' request for a 2027 start date as premature. The decision closes one chapter in a legal odyssey marked by false starts, revoked agreements, and fundamental disputes over what evidence can be used against the defendant.
The most recent upheaval came in July 2024, when Mohammed and two other alleged 9/11 conspirators reached a plea agreement with military prosecutors. Under the deal, all three would plead guilty to charges including the murder of 2,976 people in exchange for removing capital punishment from the table. Mohammed would have received a life sentence at Guantanamo. The agreement seemed to offer a resolution to a case that had stalled for years—but it lasted only days. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin revoked the deal, citing his authority as the superior convening authority under military law. Austin wrote that a decision of such magnitude required his personal approval, not that of lower-ranking officials. The move drew sharp criticism from some families of 9/11 victims, who felt their voices had been excluded from the process.
The Biden administration then took the unusual step of asking federal court to block the plea deal, arguing that Austin had acted within his legal rights. A federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., agreed in a 2-1 decision last July, upholding the Defense Secretary's power to revoke the agreement.
Beneath these procedural battles lies a deeper legal wound. The prosecution has been hamstrung for more than a decade by questions about evidence obtained through torture. Mohammed and the other defendants were held at CIA "black sites" before arriving at Guantanamo, and the admissibility of statements and information gathered during that period remains contested. Military judges have grappled with how to proceed when the foundation of the case may rest on coerced testimony and interrogation methods that the United States has since disavowed.
On September 11, 2001, al-Qaeda operatives hijacked four commercial airplanes. Two struck the Twin Towers in New York City, one hit the Pentagon, and one crashed in Pennsylvania. Nearly 3,000 people were killed and thousands more were wounded. Mohammed, who has described himself as the mastermind of the plot, has been accused of directing the operation from abroad. The attacks transformed American foreign policy, national security law, and the lives of countless families who lost loved ones that day.
Now, with a trial date set for 2028, those families face the prospect of waiting another two years for the case to reach a courtroom. The delay reflects not indifference but the genuine complexity of prosecuting a case built partly on evidence obtained through methods the nation has come to regard as torture. The trial, when it finally begins, will test whether justice can be served when the path to it has been so thoroughly compromised.
Citas Notables
Responsibility for such a decision should rest with me as the superior convening authority under the Military Commissions Act of 2009— Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, explaining his decision to revoke the plea deal