36 Years On, Hungary Opens Its Communist-Era Secret Police Files, Naming Informants

Names that could never be read are now going online
Citizens could see their own files since 1997, but never the identities of informants until now.
Mark

Why does the date matter so much?

Mimi

November 4 is when Soviet tanks entered in 1956. Releasing the files that day ties the informant networks to the repression they served.

Mark

People could already see their own files. What's actually new?

Mimi

Names. Since 1997 citizens could read their files, but never learn who informed. Now the informant databases go online.

Luke

Worth noting the scale: up to 60,000 names of an estimated 150,000. That's not everyone.

Mark

And are the files trustworthy?

Mimi

The ABTL director himself says no, not entirely. Documents are incomplete, and many files were destroyed.

Luke

Which matters, because a name in a database isn't proof of guilt. Some informants passed on information unwittingly, according to the report.

Mark

Historians seem split.

Mimi

Rainer calls it largely symbolic, decades late. Ungvary says it enables new research and debate.

Luke

Those are opinions, not outcomes. We don't yet know what the databases will show.

Mark

Is there a political edge?

Mimi

Magyar's Facebook post pointed at Fidesz, and Jozsef Horvath is a notable example of a former state security employee later in Orban's orbit.

Luke

Though the source doesn't say Horvath appears in these releases. That's an open question.

  • Databases naming up to 60,000 secret police informants go online from November 4, ending decades of restricted access.
  • Fidesz has reportedly voted against opening the files more than 30 times since 2010, sharpening a partisan standoff.
  • Archive director Bendeguz Gergo Cseh warns that many files are incomplete, unreliable, or were destroyed.
  • Historians split between welcoming new research avenues and calling the release a belated, symbolic act, with political fallout still unfolding.

Seventy years after Soviet tanks crushed the 1956 uprising on the same calendar day, Hungary has chosen to open the records of the secret police that once held its dictatorship together. The release of informant names, long withheld through decades of partial access and political resistance, touches a question every post-Communist society must eventually face: who was complicit, who was coerced, and what the nation owes to the truth of its own past. Historians remain divided on whether the timing is a genuine reckoning or a symbolic gesture, and the files themselves, incomplete and sometimes unreliable, will need careful reading before they can answer what they seem to promise.

On November 4, 1956, Soviet soldiers and tanks crushed Hungary's anti-Communist uprising, and the dictatorship that followed depended heavily on a secret police. Seventy years later, on the same date, Prime Minister Peter Magyar's government is ordering the release of the so-called agent files, which name state security informants. Some cooperated willingly, others passed on information without knowing it, and Magyar's Tisza party promised during the election to make the records public.

The demand had been argued for more than three decades. After 1989, activists and smaller parties pressed for the files to be opened, but the conservative Jozsef Antall and later Viktor Orban's Fidesz resisted, reportedly voting against release more than 30 times since 2010. The earlier system was partial: citizens could see their own files, but no one could learn the informants' names, and vague security provisions let officials block transfers. Selective access also made files into political weapons, as when former Prime Minister Peter Medgyessy was exposed in 2002.

Now the new rules reach further, with confidentiality limits eased and more databases to follow. The first release covers up to 60,000 of an estimated 150,000 informants. Archive director Bendeguz Gergo Cseh cautions that the records are often incomplete and unreliable, while historian Krisztian Ungvary welcomes them as a path to new research and public debate. Historian Janos M. Rainer argues that the moment has become more symbolic than urgent. For Magyar, the release is also a rebuke to Fidesz figures, several from Orban's circle, whose own pasts may soon be read in these pages.

On November 4, 1956, tens of thousands of Soviet soldiers and tanks rolled into Hungary and crushed the anti-Communist uprising. The dictatorship that followed leaned heavily on a secret police to hold the system together. Seventy years of memory later, on the same date this year, the Hungarian government has chosen to open that police's records.

Prime Minister Peter Magyar's government is ordering the full release of the so-called agent files, which contain the names of state security informants. Some of those informants cooperated willingly; others passed on information without knowing it. Magyar and his Tisza party had promised before the election to make the files public, and from November 4 databases holding the informants' names and key information about them are to be available online.

The release follows more than three decades of argument. After the Berlin Wall fell in 1989 and Soviet rule ended, civil rights activists and smaller parties called for the files to be opened, and repeated the demand in the decades after. Jozsef Antall, the conservative who became Hungary's first post-Communist prime minister, rejected the idea. So did Viktor Orban's long-ruling Fidesz party, which, according to the Hungarian news platform Telex, voted against opening the files more than 30 times since 2010.

What Hungary had was a partial, uneven opening. A 1994 "agents law" required members of the government, members of parliament and certain public servants to be checked for past work with the state security services. From 1997 citizens could view their own files, and access was widened in 2003. But no one could learn the names of informants. The law also contained broadly interpretable provisions that let agencies such as the Ministry of Interior block the transfer of files from the secret police to the Historical Archives of the Hungarian State Security, known as ABTL, if they judged national security to be at risk.

That selectivity had a cost beyond the withheld truth: it allowed files to be used as weapons in political fights. One example is former Prime Minister Peter Medgyessy, who was exposed in 2002 by the Fidesz-affiliated daily Magyar Nemzet as a Communist-era secret agent.

The new rules go further. Besides the informant databases, additional ones are to be released, including one of the most extensive records of people recruited by the Hungarian state security agency. Confidentiality provisions in the old agent law have been scaled back, so significantly more files will likely become accessible. The first release covers data on up to 60,000 of an estimated 150,000 informants, which could have major political consequences.

Even the keeper of the archive urges caution. ABTL director Bendeguz Gergo Cseh warned recently that one cannot believe everything the state security agencies and their files claim; many documents are incomplete and unreliable, and many files were destroyed. Historian Janos M. Rainer, an expert on the dictatorship, told Telex that publication would have made sense right after the regime fell, and that now it is more a symbolic gesture. Historian Krisztian Ungvary, who has researched the files extensively, welcomes it. He told DW it will open new avenues for research and fresh public debate, and argued that "societal lies" strain the relationship with politics, a price he says Hungary paid with 16 years of Fidesz rule.

For Magyar, reckoning with the past, especially the Orban years, is a favorite theme. When parliament amended the law in mid-September, he wrote on Facebook that after a 36-year delay parliament had decided, on Tisza's initiative, to make the files public, adding that Fidesz did not support the motion and asking why. The jab alluded to the many prominent Fidesz figures and members of Orban's inner circle who were in the Communist party or the secret police.

The best known may be Jozsef Horvath, a former full-time employee of the state security department responsible for suppressing domestic opposition. Under Orban he worked as an intelligence officer and security adviser, and in 2024 became research director of the Sovereignty Protection Office, the agency that exposed supposed enemies of the Orban government and branded them foreign agents. What the databases reveal, and how reliable it proves, will shape the political fallout to come.

You can't believe everything the state security agencies and their files claim.
— Bendeguz Gergo Cseh, director of ABTL
Societal lies inevitably lead to a strained relationship with politics, and the price we paid was 16 years of Fidesz rule.
— Historian Krisztian Ungvary, to DW
Quer a matéria completa? Leia o original em Deutsche Welle ↗
Fale Conosco FAQ