US-Iran talks show 'encouraging progress' toward 60-day final deal

Since March 2, 4,057 people have been killed in Lebanon according to health ministry figures, with at least 34 Israeli soldiers and four Israeli civilians also killed in the conflict.
The machinery of peace was being assembled. But the machinery of war had not stopped turning.
Despite diplomatic progress in Switzerland, fighting in Lebanon intensified after the preliminary agreement was signed.

In the Swiss city of Lucerne, the United States and Iran have begun their first formal negotiations toward ending a regional war that has already taken more than four thousand lives, with mediators Qatar and Pakistan reporting cautious but genuine progress. The talks carry the weight of a sixty-day deadline, a promised three-hundred-billion-dollar reconstruction plan, and the hope that two adversaries can agree on what peace actually requires of each of them. Yet even as diplomats assembled the machinery of resolution, Israeli airstrikes continued to fall on Lebanon, Iran claimed to have closed the Strait of Hormuz, and the distance between the negotiating table and the ground beneath it remained vast. History has seen many moments when the architecture of peace was built while the architecture of war still stood — and this, for now, is one of them.

  • A sixty-day clock is ticking on a final deal between the US and Iran, with mediators calling the first round of talks in Lucerne 'encouraging' — but encouragement and agreement are not the same thing.
  • Since the preliminary ceasefire was signed, at least sixty-seven people have been killed in Lebanon by Israeli airstrikes, and Hezbollah has killed five Israeli soldiers, exposing the fragility of any pause in hostilities.
  • Iran's announcement that it had closed the Strait of Hormuz — through which a fifth of the world's oil flows — sent a symbolic shockwave even as tracking data suggested ships were still moving, blurring the line between leverage and reality.
  • The American delegation arrived with a sweeping offer: sanctions lifted, three hundred billion dollars in reconstruction funding, and a transformed relationship — contingent on Iran abandoning its nuclear ambitions and its network of regional proxies.
  • Iran's lead negotiator publicly dismissed US threats as desperation, while Lebanon's death toll climbed past four thousand and Israeli forces remained dug into southern Lebanese territory with no stated timeline for withdrawal.

On Sunday, negotiators from the United States and Iran gathered in Lucerne, Switzerland, to begin the first formal round of talks aimed at ending a regional war that has already killed thousands. The meeting followed a preliminary agreement signed the week before, committing both sides to a final deal within sixty days — one that would halt fighting, reopen critical shipping lanes, and begin rebuilding Iran's battered economy.

Mediators Qatar and Pakistan announced early Monday that the talks had produced a roadmap for a final agreement, along with new communication channels designed to prevent military miscalculation. A so-called de-confliction cell — involving the US, Iran, and Lebanon under mediator oversight — was established to halt operations in Lebanon. On paper, the scaffolding of peace was going up.

But the war had not paused to wait. Since the preliminary agreement was signed, Israeli airstrikes killed at least sixty-seven people in Lebanon, including women and children. Hezbollah killed five Israeli soldiers. A US-declared ceasefire on Friday held for almost no time at all. Iran announced it had closed the Strait of Hormuz — a claim disputed by vessel tracking data, but one that underscored how volatile the region remained even as diplomats spoke of progress.

The American delegation, led by Vice President JD Vance alongside Jared Kushner and special envoy Steve Witkoff, came with a clear proposition: if Iran would abandon its nuclear ambitions and its role as a sponsor of regional militias, the US would lift all sanctions and fund a three-hundred-billion-dollar reconstruction of the Iranian economy. What remained unresolved was the nuclear question — the very issue at the heart of the original conflict.

Iran's lead negotiator, Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, was unmoved by American pressure, publicly asking whether US threats would have brought them to the table at all if they carried real weight. Iran's foreign minister claimed the talks had delivered major progress, though the evidence in Lebanon suggested otherwise. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu made clear his forces would remain in southern Lebanon indefinitely, while Hezbollah's leader rejected any Israeli military presence on Lebanese soil.

Since Lebanon was drawn into the war on March 2 — after Hezbollah launched rockets into Israel following a strike that killed Iran's supreme leader — more than four thousand people have died there. The gap between what the preliminary agreement promised and what was actually happening on the ground was already widening. The talks would continue through the week in Switzerland. In Lebanon, the fighting continued too.

In the Swiss city of Lucerne, negotiators from the United States and Iran sat down on Sunday to begin what both sides are calling a path toward ending a regional war that has already claimed thousands of lives. The talks marked the first formal round since the two countries signed a preliminary agreement the week before—a document that commits them to reaching a final deal within sixty days and includes promises to halt fighting across multiple fronts, reopen a critical shipping channel, and begin rebuilding Iran's economy.

The mediators, Qatar and Pakistan, announced early Monday that the discussions had produced what they called "encouraging progress." A high-level committee had agreed to a roadmap for the final agreement, and both sides had committed to establishing new communication channels designed to prevent accidents and miscalculation. They also created what they termed a "de-confliction cell"—a mechanism involving the US, Iran, and Lebanon, overseen by the mediating countries, meant to halt military operations in Lebanon. On the surface, the machinery of peace was being assembled.

But the machinery of war had not stopped turning. Since the preliminary agreement was signed, fighting in Lebanon has intensified sharply. Israeli airstrikes have killed at least sixty-seven people, including women and children, according to local health officials. Hezbollah attacks have killed five Israeli soldiers. The US declared a new ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah on Friday, yet the violence continued. On Saturday, Iran announced it had closed the Strait of Hormuz, the waterway through which one-fifth of the world's oil and natural gas flows. Tracking data suggested the claim was disputed—vessels continued to move through the strait—but the symbolic weight was clear: even as diplomats talked, the region remained volatile.

The American delegation, led by Vice President JD Vance and including Trump's son-in-law Jared Kushner and special envoy Steve Witkoff, arrived with a specific message. Vance said Trump had instructed negotiators to "turn over a new leaf." If Iran's leadership would abandon its role as what he called a "driver of regional instability" and surrender its nuclear weapons ambitions, the US would be willing to "fundamentally transform" its relationship with the country. The preliminary agreement already included a three-hundred-billion-dollar reconstruction plan for Iran and a commitment to lift all sanctions. What remained unresolved was the nuclear question—the very issue the US cited as justification for the conflict in the first place.

Iran's lead negotiator, Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, responded to American threats with defiance. When Trump posted on social media that Iran must stop its proxies in Lebanon or face being "hit very hard again," Ghalibaf countered: "Don't they think that if their threats had any effect, they wouldn't be in this desperate situation today?" The rhetorical posture was clear—Iran would not be intimidated into concessions. Iran's foreign minister, Seyed Abbas Araghchi, claimed the talks had "delivered major progress" toward ending the conflict in Lebanon, though the evidence on the ground suggested otherwise.

The human toll of the war continued to accumulate. Since March 2, when Lebanon was drawn into the conflict after Hezbollah launched rockets into Israel in retaliation for a strike that killed Iran's supreme leader, the Lebanese health ministry has counted four thousand fifty-seven deaths. Israel has lost at least thirty-four soldiers in Lebanon and four civilians in the north. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu made clear his military would remain in southern Lebanon—occupying roughly five percent of the country's territory—for as long as necessary to protect Israel's northern border. Hezbollah's leader, Naim Qassem, rejected any Israeli military presence and vowed his organization would defend itself.

The preliminary agreement had called for fighting to stop on all fronts. It had also promised to reopen the Strait of Hormuz and lift the military blockade on Iranian shipping. These were not small things. The closure of the strait had driven up fuel prices globally and disrupted economies worldwide. The reconstruction plan and sanctions relief represented a significant shift in American policy toward Iran. Yet sixty days remained to negotiate the details, and the gap between what was promised and what was actually happening on the ground was already widening. The talks would continue throughout the week in Switzerland, but in Lebanon, the war went on.

If Iran's leadership was willing to give up being a driver of regional instability and its nuclear weapons ambitions, then the US is willing to fundamentally transform our relationship with that country.
— Vice President JD Vance
Don't they think that if their threats had any effect, they wouldn't be in this desperate situation today?
— Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, Iran's lead negotiator
La Conversación del Hearth Otra perspectiva de la historia
Inventor

Why would Iran claim to close the Strait of Hormuz if ships are still moving through it?

Model

It's a signal—a show of strength and resolve at the negotiating table. Iran knows the world depends on that waterway. The claim matters even if it's not entirely true.

Inventor

So the preliminary agreement is already failing?

Model

Not failing, exactly. It's holding in the diplomatic space. But the military reality hasn't caught up. Israel and Hezbollah are still fighting, and neither side seems ready to actually stop.

Inventor

What does Trump want from Iran that he didn't get before?

Model

He wants Iran to stop supporting proxy forces in the region and to give up its nuclear ambitions. In his first term, he walked away from the nuclear deal. Now he's offering a different bargain—sanctions relief and reconstruction money in exchange for Iran becoming less of a regional power.

Inventor

Does Iran actually want that deal?

Model

That's the question the next sixty days will answer. Iran says its nuclear program is peaceful. It also says it's making progress toward peace. But it's also defiant when threatened. There's a lot of posturing happening.

Inventor

What about the people dying in Lebanon?

Model

They're the reason this matters. Four thousand people in two months. The preliminary agreement was supposed to stop that. It hasn't. The negotiators in Switzerland are working on a final deal, but the war hasn't paused while they talk.

Inventor

Can they actually reach a final deal in sixty days?

Model

That depends on whether both sides are willing to give up things they're not currently willing to give up. The nuclear question alone could derail everything.

Quieres la nota completa? Lee el original en BBC News ↗
Contáctanos FAQ