Trump sidesteps Blackwell chip discussion with Xi despite earlier hints

They've made it very clear they don't want Nvidia to be there right now
Huang acknowledges Beijing's deliberate pivot away from American chips, signaling a strategic shift beyond mere negotiation.

In the shadow of a five-trillion-dollar valuation and a geopolitical chess match over artificial intelligence, the most consequential chip in the world was conspicuously absent from a conversation between two heads of state. Trump met Xi in South Korea and left the Blackwell chip unspoken, even as Nvidia's Jensen Huang openly acknowledged that China had already decided it no longer wanted his company's presence. What unfolds now is less a negotiation than a reckoning — over whether technological interdependence can survive the ambitions of nations determined to chart their own futures.

  • Trump teased the possibility of raising Nvidia's Blackwell chip with Xi, briefly lifting the company to a historic five-trillion-dollar valuation — then walked it back entirely aboard Air Force One.
  • Beijing has not waited for Washington's permission to move on: Chinese regulators have quietly discouraged H20 purchases and thrown their weight behind domestic rivals like Huawei, collapsing Nvidia's market share from 95% to near zero.
  • Jensen Huang spoke with unusual candor about the damage, warning that losing China threatens the R&D engine that powers American innovation — a rare admission of how deeply the two economies remain entangled.
  • Trump positioned himself as a referee rather than a dealmaker, suggesting Nvidia and China work it out themselves, while his trade representative hinted at future conversations without offering a timeline or guarantee.
  • The proposed compromise — a downgraded Blackwell variant called the B30A — may arrive too late, as Chinese insiders suggest Beijing will hold out for its own chips rather than accept an inferior American product.

Jensen Huang didn't mince words this week: Nvidia had stopped asking Washington for permission to ship its newest chips to China, because Beijing had made clear it no longer wanted them there. Huang warned that losing the Chinese market wasn't just a business problem — it threatened the research funding that kept American innovation competitive. His frustration set the stage for what followed.

The day before Trump met Xi Jinping in South Korea, he called the Blackwell chip "super-duper" and hinted he might raise it at the table. That offhand comment was enough to push Nvidia past a five-trillion-dollar valuation for the first time in history. But when the meeting happened, the Blackwell never came up. Flying home on Air Force One, Trump told reporters that semiconductors had been discussed and that China would be talking to Nvidia — then added the deflating clarification: "We're not talking about the Blackwell."

The Blackwell has become the symbolic center of a broader contest over who will control artificial intelligence's future. Washington's export controls were designed to slow China's technological rise; Nvidia has been quietly developing a less powerful variant for the Chinese market as a potential middle ground. But the deeper problem is that China has moved on. Over the past two months, Beijing discouraged domestic companies from buying even the permitted H20 chip and began actively promoting Huawei and other homegrown alternatives. Nvidia's share of China's advanced AI chip market fell from 95 percent in 2022 to nearly nothing.

Trump, pressed on the impasse, cast himself as a referee rather than a negotiator. His trade representative suggested Nvidia would now hold its own conversations with Beijing. Some sources indicated China might consider the downgraded B30A variant if Washington approved it — but others were skeptical, believing Beijing would simply wait for its own chip industry to close the gap.

The larger question hanging over all of it is whether any deal still matters. China's turn away from Nvidia looks less like a negotiating posture and more like a strategic choice — a decision that dependence on American hardware is no longer acceptable. If Chinese chips catch up before any agreement is reached, the conversation may render itself obsolete.

Jensen Huang stood before a room of developers this week and laid out a problem with unusual candor: his company wasn't even bothering to ask the U.S. government for permission to ship Nvidia's newest chips to China anymore. The reason was simple. Beijing had made its position unmistakable. "They've made it very clear that they don't want Nvidia to be there right now," Huang said, his frustration evident. He added something else—that losing access to the Chinese market threatened Nvidia's ability to fund the research and development that kept American innovation moving forward.

This backdrop made what happened in South Korea all the more curious. A day before his meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping, Trump had called Nvidia's Blackwell chip "super-duper" and hinted he might bring it up with Xi. The comment was enough to help Nvidia become the first company ever to hit a five-trillion-dollar valuation. But when Trump sat down with Xi on Thursday, the Blackwell chip never came up. Aboard Air Force One afterward, Trump told reporters that semiconductors had been discussed and that China would be "talking to Nvidia and others about taking chips." Then he added the clarification that seemed to deflate weeks of speculation: "We're not talking about the Blackwell."

The Blackwell has become the flashpoint in a much larger struggle over who controls the future of artificial intelligence. Washington has imposed strict export controls on Nvidia's most advanced chips, trying to slow China's technological progress and limit capabilities that could benefit its military. Nvidia has been developing a less powerful version of the Blackwell specifically for the Chinese market—something between what it currently allows and what China actually wants. But the real problem isn't American restrictions. It's that China has stopped wanting what Nvidia is offering.

Over the past two months, Beijing's regulators have questioned whether Nvidia's H20 chip poses security risks and discouraged domestic companies from buying it. At the same time, China has been actively promoting its own chipmakers, particularly Huawei. The effect has been dramatic. Nvidia's share of the advanced AI chip market in China has collapsed from 95 percent in 2022 to nearly nothing. When Huang spoke about this at a financial conference this month, he didn't hide his dismay. The tit-for-tat moves between Washington and Beijing had essentially erased Nvidia's position in one of the world's largest markets.

Trump, when asked about the impasse, seemed reluctant to wade into the details. "I said that's really between you and Nvidia, but we're sort of the arbitrator or the referee," he told reporters. U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, traveling with Trump, suggested that Nvidia would now have conversations with China to explore what might be possible. He noted that the U.S. had already sent many advanced chips to China over the years. But people with knowledge of Chinese market discussions were skeptical anything would change quickly. They believed Beijing would not accept an inferior product when it thought its own companies could catch up to current technology soon enough. Still, some sources suggested China might consider the downgraded Blackwell variant—called the B30A—if Washington gave its approval.

What remains unclear is whether any of this matters anymore. The Chinese government's pivot away from Nvidia suggests a strategic decision that goes beyond negotiating better terms. By promoting domestic alternatives and cooling toward American chips, Beijing may be signaling that it no longer sees dependence on U.S. hardware as acceptable, regardless of what Trump or Huang might offer. The question now is whether China's own chip industry can deliver what its companies need before any deal gets struck—and whether, by then, the conversation will have become irrelevant.

They've made it very clear that they don't want Nvidia to be there right now
— Jensen Huang, Nvidia CEO
We're not talking about the Blackwell
— Donald Trump, after meeting with Xi Jinping
A Conversa do Hearth Outra perspectiva sobre a história
Inventor

Why did Trump say he might discuss the Blackwell chip with Xi, then claim it never came up?

Model

He was probably testing the waters. Saying it publicly helps Nvidia's stock price, costs him nothing politically, and keeps options open. But when he actually sat down with Xi, the conversation apparently went a different direction—or he decided the topic was too hot to handle.

Inventor

Is this about the U.S. trying to protect its technology lead?

Model

That's part of it, but it's more complicated now. The U.S. wants to slow China's AI progress, sure. But China has decided it doesn't want to be dependent on American chips at all. They're actively pushing companies away from Nvidia and building their own alternatives. It's not just about export controls anymore—it's about Beijing choosing a different path.

Inventor

So Huang's argument that China needs American chips doesn't work anymore?

Model

Not with the Chinese government, no. Private companies might want them, but Beijing is discouraging that. Huang is essentially arguing that cutting Nvidia out hurts America's R&D spending, but that's a plea to Washington, not Beijing. China has decided the strategic cost of dependence is too high.

Inventor

What about this B30A chip—the downgraded Blackwell variant?

Model

It's a middle ground that probably satisfies nobody. China doesn't want inferior chips if they think their own companies will catch up soon. And it doesn't solve the dependence problem Beijing is trying to escape. It might be offered, but I'd be surprised if it changes the trajectory.

Inventor

So Nvidia's market share in China went from 95 percent to nearly zero. How did that happen so fast?

Model

Government pressure works quickly when it's coordinated. Regulators questioned security, discouraged purchases, and promoted domestic competitors. Private companies follow those signals. It's not a market decision—it's a policy decision. Nvidia's technology didn't get worse; the political environment did.

Quer a matéria completa? Leia o original em Devdiscourse ↗
Fale Conosco FAQ