Six months into a war he promised would last weeks, Donald Trump finds himself at the lowest point of his current presidency — 33 percent approval — as fuel prices climb a third higher and eight in ten Americans brace for a conflict without a visible end. The Iran war, launched in February to prevent nuclear proliferation, has instead become a test of whether a leader's credibility can survive the distance between a campaign promise and a prolonged reality. History reminds us that wars have a way of outlasting the certainties of those who begin them, and that economic pain has a way of making
Al Jazeera
· Aug 17, 2026
· governance
· 2 min de leitura
High
Apuração: Verificado
Trump's approval hits record low as Iran war fuels economic concerns
◉
War & Conflict
7788 artigos relacionados
Netanyahu's Likud compares NYC mayor Mamdani to Iran, Hezbollah leader…
The Guardian · 100% correspondência
Ukraine Develops Domestic Ballistic Missiles to Strike Russian Aircraf…
Google News · 99% correspondência
Putin's Kuril Islands visit signals punishment for Japan's Ukraine sup…
Deutsche Welle · 99% correspondência
Rouble extends recovery toward pre-invasion levels as stocks rally on …
Devdiscourse · 99% correspondência
Kushner meets Hamas as diplomatic push aims to break Gaza ceasefire st…
The Guardian · 99% correspondência
Cobertura Relacionada
BBC News · Aug 18
USS Abraham Lincoln faces scrutiny over crew conditions during extended deployment
The USS Abraham Lincoln faces mounting concerns over crew conditions including food shortages, broken plumbing, and ment…
The Guardian · Aug 18 Half of UK homes taking longer to sell as mortgage volatility deters buyersHalf of British homes are taking longer to sell as mortgage rate uncertainty linked to Middle East conflict prompts buye…
BBC News · Aug 18 Russia warns UK over drone supplies as Ukraine strikes intensifyRussia warns the UK of consequences for supplying drones used in strikes on Russian territory, while Britain reaffirms i…
i24news.tv · Aug 18 German Rearmament Stirs European Anxiety as Berlin Seeks Reassurance Through CooperationGermany's military expansion to 150 billion euros annually by 2029 raises historical concerns among European neighbors, …
Viés e Enquadramento
⚖
Article uses polling data to frame Trump's declining approval as driven by Iran conflict concerns, emphasizing economic impacts and public skepticism about war duration.
Bias Direction
center-left
Confidence
MED
Problem-consequence framing that emphasizes negative polling outcomes and economic hardship, positioning Trump's statements as dismissive of public concerns ('tiny little bit more').
overwhelming majority
a very evil country
proved resilient
bottled up
gone too far
record low
Trump administration's rationale for Iran policy beyond nuclear concerns
Perspectives from Trump supporters on why the conflict is justified
Analysis of whether fuel price increases are primarily Iran-conflict-related vs. other factors
Expert analysis on Iran's actual nuclear capabilities or threat level
Discussion of alternative approaches to Iran policy
Impacto Geopolítico
🌎
Trump's approval rating collapses to 33% amid prolonged Iran conflict and fuel price surges, with 80% of Americans fearing indefinite war and economic deterioration.
Escalation Risk
moderate
Confidence
HIGH
United States
Iran
Israel
Middle East
Strait of Hormuz
Global energy markets
Domestic erosion of Trump's political capital weakens US executive authority in foreign policy. Iran's resilience in maintaining energy blockade demonstrates asymmetric leverage over global markets. Israel's dependence on US support faces domestic political constraints. Bipartisan concern (71% Republicans, 87% Democrats) suggests potential congressional pushback on Iran strategy, limiting unilateral executive action.
Similar to Vietnam War's erosion of presidential approval (Johnson's 35% in 1968) when public perceived mission creep and economic costs outweighed strategic justification, creating domestic political constraints on military continuation.
Lente Econômica
📈
Geopolitical conflict with Iran drives fuel prices up 33% YoY, eroding consumer confidence and presidential approval to 33%, creating stagflation risks amid public skepticism about conflict duration.
Market Signal
bearish
Confidence
HIGH
Energy/Oil & Gas
Transportation
Consumer Discretionary
Automotive
Retail
Households face elevated gasoline prices (up ~33% YoY), reducing disposable income for other consumption. 80% of Americans expect prolonged conflict, dampening consumer confidence and likely suppressing discretionary spending. Lower approval ratings suggest political uncertainty affecting business investment decisions.
Sustained high fuel prices may pressure administration to consider strategic petroleum reserve releases or negotiate conflict resolution. Congress may face pressure to debate war authorization and fiscal costs. Central bank may confront inflation persistence despite demand destruction from higher energy costs, complicating monetary policy decisions.