Trump Backs Jim Jordan for House Speaker, Flexes Party Control

The party was his to lead, at least for now
Trump demonstrated his continued control over Republican politics despite no longer holding elected office.

Com a cadeira da presidência da Câmara vazia após a destituição de Kevin McCarthy, Donald Trump — ainda candidato à presidência, mas sem cargo eletivo — exerceu sua influência sobre o Partido Republicano ao endossar publicamente o congressista Jim Jordan para o posto. O gesto revelou menos uma preferência pessoal do que uma afirmação de poder: numa legenda fragmentada entre alas conservadoras e moderadas, a palavra de Trump ainda funciona como bússola. A crise de liderança tornou-se, assim, mais um capítulo na longa narrativa de como um homem fora do governo continua a governar seu partido.

  • A destituição de McCarthy deixou a Câmara sem liderança e expôs a fratura profunda entre a ala radical e os moderados republicanos, nenhum dos quais conseguia convergir espontaneamente em torno de um nome.
  • Jordan e Scalise disputam os mesmos 218 votos necessários para assumir o cargo, e a divisão interna é tão aguda que nenhum dos dois tinha garantia de vitória mesmo antes do endosso de Trump.
  • Ao postar seu apoio a Jordan no Truth Social, Trump transformou uma eleição interna do Congresso em um teste de lealdade pessoal — quem vota contra Jordan, vota contra ele.
  • Para ampliar sua margem de manobra, Trump sugeriu que poderia ele mesmo ocupar interinamente a presidência da Câmara por 30 a 90 dias, caso nenhum candidato atingisse o quórum necessário.
  • A situação permanece em aberto: o próprio aliado de Trump, Troy Nehls, admitiu publicamente não saber quem seria capaz de chegar aos 218 votos, sinalizando que o endosso influente não é garantia de resultado.

Quando Kevin McCarthy foi destituído da presidência da Câmara, Donald Trump não esperou que o vácuo se preenchesse sozinho. Na noite de sexta-feira, 6 de junho, ele publicou no Truth Social seu apoio a Jim Jordan, congressista de Ohio e presidente do Comitê Judiciário, conhecido por ser um dos defensores mais fervorosos do ex-presidente. A mensagem implícita era clara: mesmo sem cargo, Trump ainda ditava os rumos do Partido Republicano.

Jordan disputava a posição com Steve Scalise, líder da maioria na Câmara e representante da Louisiana. Ambos precisavam de 218 votos para vencer — um número difícil de alcançar num caucus dividido entre a ala radical e os moderados. O endosso de Trump tinha peso justamente porque a legenda não conseguia produzir um consenso por conta própria. Ao escolher Jordan, Trump sinalizava aos seus aliados como votar.

O apoio havia sido antecipado na quinta-feira pelo congressista texano Troy Nehls, que revelou a preferência de Trump à imprensa. Mas Trump foi além do endosso: em entrevistas à Fox News Digital, sugeriu que poderia assumir ele mesmo a presidência da Câmara em caráter temporário — por 30 a 90 dias — caso nem Jordan nem Scalise conseguissem os votos necessários. Apresentou a ideia como um gesto de unidade, dizendo ter sido solicitado por amigos no Congresso.

As credenciais de Jordan como leal a Trump eram sólidas: ele havia liderado investigações contra os promotores que indiciaram o ex-presidente e participado dos esforços para contestar os resultados eleitorais de 2020. Para a base trumpista, era a escolha óbvia. Ainda assim, o próprio Nehls reconheceu a incerteza, afirmando que a conferência estava dividida e que não sabia quem chegaria aos 218 votos.

O que ficou evidente foi que Trump soube usar a crise para reafirmar seu domínio sobre a política republicana. Sem ocupar nenhum cargo, ele moldou uma das decisões mais importantes do Congresso americano — e lembrou ao partido que, fraturado ou não, ainda olhava para ele em busca de direção.

Donald Trump stepped into the vacuum left by Kevin McCarthy's removal as House Speaker with a calculation that was part endorsement, part power play. Late Friday night, June 6th, Trump posted to his Truth Social platform backing Jim Jordan, the combative Ohio congressman who chairs the House Judiciary Committee and has been one of his most reliable defenders in Congress. The message was unmistakable: Trump still controlled the Republican Party, even from outside elected office.

Jordan was one of two main contenders for the Speaker's gavel, competing against Steve Scalise, the Louisiana Republican who held the title of majority leader. Both men needed 218 votes to win the job, and both needed support from the party's fractious wings—the hard-right flank and the moderates who rarely saw eye to eye. Trump's endorsement carried weight precisely because the Republican caucus was so deeply divided that no consensus candidate had emerged naturally. By backing Jordan, Trump was signaling to his loyalists which way to vote.

The endorsement itself came after Texas congressman Troy Nehls had already announced Trump's preference on Thursday evening, telling reporters that the former president wanted Jordan in the role. When asked by the Associated Press why Trump had made this choice, Nehls explained it simply: Trump believed Jordan was the right person for the job. But Trump wasn't content to merely endorse from the sidelines. He also floated the idea that he himself might serve as a temporary Speaker—a 30- to 90-day caretaker role—if neither Jordan nor Scalise could muster the votes. In interviews with Fox News Digital, Trump framed this as a unifying gesture, saying he had been asked to step in because he had many friends in Congress.

Jordan's credentials as a Trump loyalist were substantial. He had led Republican investigations into the prosecutors who charged Trump, and he had been part of the group that worked with Trump to overturn the 2020 election results before January 6th. In the eyes of Trump's supporters, Jordan was the obvious choice. But it remained unclear whether Trump's backing would be enough to push Scalise out of the race or whether either candidate could actually reach the 218-vote threshold. Nehls himself acknowledged the uncertainty, telling reporters that the conference was divided and the country was broken, and he didn't know who could get to 218.

What was clear was that Trump had used the leadership crisis to demonstrate his continued grip on Republican politics. Even as a candidate for president, not a sitting officeholder, he could shape the party's most consequential decisions. His posts on Truth Social and his comments to friendly media outlets kept the focus on his preferences and his power. The Republican Party, fractured as it was, still looked to him for direction. Whether that direction would actually produce a Speaker remained to be seen, but the message Trump was sending was unmistakable: the party was his to lead, at least for now.

He will be a GREAT Speaker of the House and will have my total and complete support
— Trump, in his Truth Social post endorsing Jordan
Our conference is divided. Our country is broken. I don't know who can get to 218
— Troy Nehls, Texas congressman, on the Speaker race
A Conversa do Hearth Outra perspectiva sobre a história
Inventor

Why did Trump feel the need to insert himself into this race at all? Jordan was already running.

Model

Because the party was paralyzed. McCarthy's removal left no clear successor, and Republicans couldn't agree on anyone. Trump saw an opening to show he still controlled the outcome.

Inventor

But he's not in Congress anymore. What actual power does his endorsement have?

Model

His endorsement tells the Trump loyalists how to vote. In a divided caucus, that bloc can be decisive. And more than that, it keeps him at the center of the story.

Inventor

The idea of Trump serving as temporary Speaker—was that serious?

Model

Probably not. But it kept the possibility alive, kept people talking about him as a solution. It was a way of saying: if you can't figure this out, I'm still here.

Inventor

Jordan and Scalise both needed 218 votes. Did anyone think Trump's endorsement would actually get Jordan there?

Model

No one knew. The caucus was too divided. But it signaled to the right wing which way Trump wanted them to go, and that mattered.

Inventor

What does this tell us about the state of the Republican Party?

Model

That it's organized around one person's preferences, not around institutional leadership or shared principles. Trump doesn't hold office, but he still shapes what happens.

Fale Conosco FAQ