36 cents in return for every dollar spent
Infrastructure Australia found level crossing removals deliver only 36 cents benefit per dollar invested, with costs significantly outweighing social and economic gains. The government chose one major 18-month closure over staged works to complete the project faster, but experts warn completion on time and budget is risky given other Perth infrastructure projects.
- 18-month shutdown of Armadale train line for $2 billion Metronet upgrades
- Infrastructure Australia found only 36 cents benefit per dollar invested
- Government chose one major closure over staged works to finish faster
- Gosnells council excluded from level crossing removals at William Street and Kelvin Road
An 18-month shutdown of Perth's Armadale train line for Metronet upgrades faces criticism from transport experts who question whether the $2 billion project's benefits justify the massive commuter disruption.
Perth's Armadale train line will shut down for 18 months starting soon, and the decision is already drawing fire from people who study how cities move. The closure is part of a $2 billion Metronet project to remove level crossings and upgrade the rail corridor. But a transport expert at Curtin University is asking a straightforward question: Is the disruption worth what we actually get in return?
Courtney Babb, a senior lecturer in urban and regional planning, points to analysis done by Infrastructure Australia in late 2020. That analysis found something striking: the costs of removing those level crossings "significantly outweigh the social, economic and environmental benefits." The Infrastructure Australia report was blunt. It said the project was unlikely to deliver any productivity benefit to the economy at all. For every dollar spent, the analysis found, the community would see only 36 cents in return. There is also, the report noted, limited evidence that removing the level crossings is even the most cost-effective way to solve the problems they're meant to address.
Babb told The West Australian that finding a global comparison for an 18-month closure of a major rail service is nearly impossible. He called it "a bit of an experiment." The government, he suggested, chose this path—one massive shutdown rather than a series of smaller, staged works—for a reason. A staged approach would have taken two to three years longer. But there's another possibility lurking beneath the surface. "Potentially the date of the 2025 election might have something to do with it," Babb said. "They might be banking on the project being done and dusted and delivered by that stage." The risk, though, is real. Other major infrastructure work is happening across Perth right now. The global situation is uncertain. Betting that this project will finish on time and on budget is, he said, a risky move.
The mayors of the councils affected by the closure had mixed reactions—and most of them were blindsided. They weren't consulted about the extended shutdown. They found out only shortly before the government announced it publicly. Canning's mayor, Patrick Hall, called it a "brave and bold decision." Yes, commuters will suffer in the short term. Many will be pushed onto Albany Highway, which is already congested. But Hall believed the long-term payoff justified the pain. Gosnells' mayor Terresa Lynes was less convinced. She said she was "bitterly disappointed" that no level crossings were being removed within her council's boundaries—particularly at the busy William Street and Kelvin Road intersections. "If not completed as part of this project, there is every likelihood that these critical level crossing removals will not be undertaken in the foreseeable future," she said. She also warned that the rail closure would add "significant pressure" to the road network and urged the government to relocate water pipes at Olga Road and Albany Highway before the shutdown began, to avoid creating gridlock.
Armadale's mayor, Ruth Butterfield, acknowledged the "amazing" long-term gains the project would bring to her residents. But she also understood the immediate cost. Some people depend on the train to reach the CBD. Without it, they'll face higher fuel prices and Perth's parking costs. "That is going to be difficult for a lot of people," she said. Transport Minister Rita Saffioti defended the decision. A staged approach, she said, would have meant constantly changing bus routes and timetables as construction moved from one section to another. Passengers would have had less reliable replacement services. The 18-month closure, she argued, is "the least disruptive over the longer term" and allows the work to happen faster in a safer workplace. She also pushed back on the Infrastructure Australia analysis, saying it "does not account for or reflect the wider community benefit." But for Babb and others watching this unfold, the math remains troubling: massive disruption now, questionable returns later, and no guarantee the work will finish when promised.
Citações Notáveis
There is definitely a question about the overall benefits and whether the long term disruption is really worth it.— Courtney Babb, Curtin University transport expert
The 18 month closure will be disruptive and we apologise for this in advance. However this has been found to be the least disruptive over the longer term.— Rita Saffioti, Transport Minister
A Conversa do Hearth Outra perspectiva sobre a história
So Infrastructure Australia actually ran the numbers on this project and found it delivers only 36 cents per dollar spent. Why would a government go ahead with something that fails that basic test?
That's the question everyone's asking. The minister says the analysis doesn't capture the full community benefit—things like safety improvements, reduced congestion at crossings over decades. But Babb's point is sharper: if you can't prove the benefit outweighs the cost, why impose 18 months of chaos on half a million commuters?
Why not just do the work in stages, like Babb suggested? Spread it out, keep the trains running?
The government says staged work would take two to three years longer and would mean constantly shuffling bus routes and timetables. Commuters would never know what service they'd have week to week. But Babb hints at something else—the 2025 election. If you finish the whole thing in 18 months, you can campaign on a completed project. If you drag it out, you're still dealing with disruption when voters go to the polls.
What about the councils that aren't getting any level crossings removed? Gosnells was upset about that.
Exactly. Terresa Lynes said if those crossings at William Street and Kelvin Road don't get done now, they probably never will. So you've got this weird situation where some areas get the benefit and the pain, others just get the pain, and some get neither. It's not evenly distributed.
Are people going to be okay during the 18 months?
That depends on who you are. If you have a car, you'll sit in worse traffic on Albany Highway. If you don't, if you depend on the train to get to work in the CBD, you're in real trouble. Fuel prices are high. Parking is expensive. Butterfield was honest about that—some residents will struggle.