Squeezed from both sides, with nowhere left to turn
Brazilian business confidence hit its lowest level since COVID-19 in August, driven by 40% US tariffs affecting 55% of exports to America, the country's second-largest trade partner. Export-dependent sectors like steel, wood, and beef face severe contraction, with some products seeing 93% export declines; manufacturers are freezing investments and planning layoffs.
- US imposed 40% tariff on Brazilian imports on July 30, affecting 55% of exports to America
- August exports to US fell 18.5% year-over-year to $2.6 billion, lowest since pandemic
- Projections: 188,700 to 618,000 job losses; R$31-110 billion in GDP losses over 2-10 years
- Business confidence hit pandemic-era lows; deterioration in 78 of 49 economic segments analyzed
- Aircraft exports down 93%, turbines down 61%, frozen beef down 48%
US tariffs on Brazilian products have caused business confidence to plummet to pandemic-era lows, with exports to America falling 18.5% and projections of 188,000-618,000 job losses over coming years.
In August, Brazilian business confidence collapsed to levels not seen since the worst months of the pandemic. The trigger was unmistakable: on July 30th, the United States imposed a 40 percent tariff on Brazilian imports, a blow that landed on an economy already weakened by interest rates at 15 percent annually and years of stalled structural reform. The tariffs covered roughly 55 percent of what Brazil ships to America—its second-largest trading partner and the primary destination for manufactured goods. The result was immediate and severe. Exports to the United States fell 18.5 percent in August compared to the same month a year earlier, dropping to $2.6 billion, the lowest figure for that month since the pandemic began.
The damage spread unevenly but widely. Aircraft exports plummeted 93 percent. Turbines and gas generators fell 61 percent. Frozen beef dropped nearly 48 percent. Essential wood products, óleos essenciais, and other staples of Brazil's export economy contracted between 48 and 52 percent. The pain was not confined to a few sectors. The Getulio Vargas Foundation's Institute of Economics measured confidence across 49 economic segments and found deterioration in 78 of them. Manufacturers who sell abroad—long considered the most resilient part of the industrial base—saw their confidence index fall 9.2 percent between June and August, moving from optimism into deep pessimism. The broader industrial sector had already endured eight months of declining confidence. Now it faced something worse.
What made this moment particularly dangerous was the timing. The tariff shock arrived in an environment already fragile. High interest rates were already suppressing investment and consumption. The domestic market, weakened by the cost of borrowing, could not absorb the production that manufacturers could no longer sell abroad. Companies found themselves squeezed from both sides. Stéfano Pacini, an economist at the Getulio Vargas Foundation, described the combination as a challenging scenario: monetary contraction meeting sudden external uncertainty, with tariffs intensifying the pressure.
Business leaders responded by freezing plans. The National Confederation of Industry reported that manufacturers now expect export volumes to fall and are preparing for layoffs. Investment intentions have retreated to their lowest point since October 2023. Employment expectations in manufacturing have reached their worst level since June 2020, during the pandemic's deepest moment. The pessimism is not abstract. It translates into specific decisions: do not hire, do not build, do not expand.
The projected human cost is staggering. A study by the Federation of Industries of Minas Gerais projects that over five to ten years, the tariffs could eliminate more than 618,000 jobs and reduce GDP by 110 billion reais. A separate analysis from the Federal University of Minas Gerais, using economic modeling, estimates that within two years the tariffs will reduce GDP by 31 billion reais and eliminate 188,700 jobs. The hardest-hit sectors are steel, chemicals, and wood products—all labor-intensive, all deeply integrated into global supply chains. The damage will concentrate in states that depend heavily on American markets: São Paulo, Minas Gerais, Rio de Janeiro, and Rio Grande do Sul. But some smaller states face even greater vulnerability. Ceará's export portfolio is 67 percent iron, steel, and cast iron. Nearly 45 percent of what Ceará ships goes to the United States, and 98.6 percent of that was not exempted from the tariffs.
Consumers are already adjusting. A survey by HSR Specialist Researchers found that 54 percent of Brazilians report feeling the tariffs' impact on their household budgets. The pain is sharpest for essentials: food, fuel, medicine. Lower-income families and residents of the North region—already economically vulnerable—feel it most acutely. Valéria Rodrigues, CEO of Shopper Experience, noted that the perception of inflation is concentrating on essential goods, directly eroding purchasing power and changing consumption patterns. Families are cutting spending and postponing purchases. The National Confederation of Industry now projects that household consumption will grow just 2.3 percent in 2025, less than half the 4.8 percent growth recorded in 2024.
The crisis has exposed something deeper than a trade dispute. Brazil's economy lacks the structural flexibility to absorb external shocks. There have been no meaningful reforms to open trade, simplify the tax system, or control public spending. The country remains hostage to external decisions and internal rigidities. The tariff war is not the cause of Brazil's fragility. It is a stress test that revealed how fragile the foundation already was.
Notable Quotes
The combination of monetary contraction and increased uncertainty, intensified by new tariffs on Brazilian products, creates a challenging scenario for the sector.— Stéfano Pacini, economist at FGV Ibre
The perception of inflation is concentrating on essential goods, directly eroding purchasing power and changing consumption patterns.— Valéria Rodrigues, CEO of Shopper Experience
The Hearth Conversation Another angle on the story
Why did business confidence fall so sharply in August specifically? Was it just the tariffs, or was something else breaking at the same time?
The tariffs were the spark, but the kindling was already there. Interest rates were at 15 percent. The domestic market was already weak. Manufacturers had nowhere to turn—they couldn't sell abroad because of the tariffs, and they couldn't sell at home because consumers couldn't afford to buy. It was a perfect collision.
The numbers are striking—some exports down 93 percent. How do companies even survive a shock like that?
Many won't, at least not without major changes. The aircraft sector, for instance, is built on long supply chains and thin margins. When demand drops 93 percent, you can't just wait it out. You have to cut costs immediately, which means people lose jobs.
The studies project 188,000 to 618,000 job losses. That's a huge range. What explains the difference?
It depends on how long the tariffs stay in place and whether there's any negotiation or relief. The lower number assumes two years of impact. The higher number assumes five to ten years. If this becomes permanent, the damage compounds—suppliers close, skills are lost, entire regional economies contract.
You mentioned that smaller states like Ceará are more vulnerable than bigger ones. Why would size matter?
Because Ceará's entire export economy is built on steel and iron. Nearly half of what they ship goes to America. When that market closes, there's no backup plan, no diversification to fall back on. São Paulo has agriculture, services, multiple industries. Ceará has one thing.
And consumers are already cutting back on spending. How long before that feeds back into more job losses?
It's already happening. Retailers are seeing it. Manufacturers know it's coming. When people stop buying, factories slow down, workers get laid off, and those workers stop buying. The cycle accelerates. That's why the confidence numbers are so dark—everyone sees it coming.