AFA blocks judicial probe into finances and Faroni's dollar collections

A pattern of deliberate obscurity buried in vague categories
The prosecutor found that TOURPRODENTER LLC's activities were hidden in financial statements under generic labels like sponsorships and commercial rights.

AFA secured a civil court injunction halting the Justice Inspection's access to disputed financial records, effectively pausing sanctions and regulatory oversight. Prosecutor Gerchunoff documented suspicious accounting patterns, including $14.5M owed by U.S. firm Tourprodenter LLC and unexplained millions in foreign currency operations.

  • AFA obtained court injunction blocking Justice Inspection access to 2022-2025 financial records
  • TOURPRODENTER LLC, a U.S. firm linked to Javier Faroni, moved millions through five American banks
  • AFA's net equity multiplied more than 30 times between 2022 and 2025
  • Prosecutor documented $14.5 million owed by TOURPRODENTER LLC in June 2024 balance sheet, then vanished from 2025 records
  • Federal judge ordered investigations into corporate spending, contract legality, and fund transfers

Argentina's football federation (AFA) obtained a court injunction blocking regulatory inspections of financial records from 2022-2025, allegedly delaying accountability until after major tournaments. A prosecutor revealed evidence of potential fraud involving millions in unaccounted dollars through a U.S. firm.

Argentina's football federation has successfully blocked a government regulator from examining its financial records, at least for now. In early June, just as the Club World Cup was beginning in the United States and days before the national team's opening match, the AFA obtained a court injunction from the Civil Appeals Chamber that halted the Justice Inspection's demand to review disputed accounting statements covering 2022 through 2025. The timing was not accidental. Sources close to the investigations describe it as a deliberate stalling tactic—one designed to push accountability hearings past major sporting events, betting that another Argentine victory would soften the blow of whatever legal consequences might follow.

The Justice Inspection had left its formal demand at the AFA's historic headquarters on Viamonte Street on May 7th. The doors were closed. But the federation's lawyers moved quickly, securing the injunction and freezing the process once again. This was not the first such maneuver. The Superliga, the professional league, had pulled off something similar months earlier, even after receiving a formal warning from regulators. The pattern suggests a coordinated strategy: delay, obstruct, wait for the next trophy.

The regulatory machinery itself had stalled earlier in the year. Daniel Vítolo, who had been pushing the inspection process, left his post at the Justice Inspection on March 6th. His replacement, Alejandro Ramírez, took time to restart the work. When the inspection finally resumed, the court injunction blocked it again. In his ruling, Ramírez had determined that the AFA had failed its legal obligation to cooperate and provide information, and he ordered sanctions and a ten-day deadline for compliance. The Civil Appeals Chamber's Room D—judges Luis Maximiliano Caia, Juan Manuel Converset, and Gabriel Gerardo Rolleri—disagreed, at least provisionally.

Meanwhile, a federal prosecutor had uncovered something far more troubling. Emilio Gerchunoff, who specializes in economic crimes, was examining a fraud complaint filed by businessman Guillermo Tofoni against the AFA. Though Gerchunoff ultimately declared himself without jurisdiction to continue, his findings were damning. He documented what he called a "broader fraudulent scheme" involving the misappropriation of federation funds, particularly money generated from the national team's commercial exploitation abroad. At the center of this scheme sat TOURPRODENTER LLC, a U.S. company linked to businessman Javier Faroni, which the AFA had contracted as its foreign revenue collector. In a stunning move, AFA president Claudio Tapia and treasurer Pablo Toviggino had extended that contract through 2030.

Gerchunoff's analysis revealed a pattern of deliberate obscurity. The 2022 and 2023 financial statements made no clear mention of TOURPRODENTER LLC, despite its central role in the federation's international operations. The company finally appeared in the June 2024 balance sheet as owing the AFA roughly $14.5 million—then vanished again from the 2025 statements. This alternating presence and absence, Gerchunoff wrote, constituted "a relevant indication of accounting inconsistency and possible systematic concealment." The financial records buried the company's activities under vague categories: sponsorships, commercial rights, national team competitions, financial income, other resources.

Discovery documents obtained in the United States revealed the scale of what those records concealed. TOURPRODENTER LLC maintained accounts at Bank of America, Synovus Bank, JPMorgan Chase, Citibank, and PNC Bank. Millions of dollars moved through those accounts—sums far larger than what appeared in the AFA's official books. Central Bank records showed the AFA conducted 385 foreign currency purchases totaling $85.2 billion pesos and 678 sales totaling $165.5 billion pesos between 2022 and 2025. Two transactions on March 30, 2023, classified as freight services and routed through Banco Credicoop, involved $1.12 million and $1.29 million linked to TOURPRODENTER LLC. Additional transfers labeled as foreign trade wire transfers moved $269 million and $233 million through Credicoop, though TOURPRODENTER LLC's name did not appear explicitly on those records.

The AFA's declared wealth had exploded. Between 2022 and 2025, total assets grew from $12.2 billion pesos to $137.9 billion pesos. Net equity multiplied more than thirty times since Argentina won the World Cup in Qatar. Gerchunoff suggested the company and its related entities may have functioned as vehicles to siphon money that should have entered the federation's coffers, with the accounting gaps serving as cover for those diversions. A federal judge in Zárate has ordered investigations into corporate credit card spending, the legality of the TOURPRODENTER LLC contract, and transfers to other firms. The question now is whether the court injunction will hold long enough for the next tournament to pass.

A broader fraudulent scheme involving the misappropriation of federation funds, particularly money generated from the national team's commercial exploitation abroad
— Prosecutor Emilio Gerchunoff
A relevant indication of accounting inconsistency and possible systematic concealment
— Prosecutor Emilio Gerchunoff, on TOURPRODENTER LLC's alternating presence and absence in financial statements
A Conversa do Hearth Outra perspectiva sobre a história
Inventor

Why would a sports federation go to such lengths to hide its finances?

Model

Because the money involved is enormous, and because nobody was watching closely until recently. The national team generates hundreds of millions in commercial revenue. If some of that is being diverted through shell companies, the amounts could be staggering.

Inventor

But wouldn't people notice? Accountants, board members, someone?

Model

That's the point of the accounting tricks. You bury the transactions in generic categories, you route them through foreign banks, you make the company appear and disappear from the statements. It's designed so that even if someone is looking, they see fog.

Inventor

The timing seems deliberate—blocking the inspection right before the World Cup.

Model

Exactly. The prosecutor noted it himself. If the legal process moves slowly enough, if the next tournament brings another victory, the public mood shifts. People forgive a lot when their team is winning.

Inventor

What about the people running the federation? Do they face personal consequences?

Model

That depends on whether the federal investigation moves forward. The judge has ordered probes into spending patterns and contract legality. But first, the courts have to decide whether the injunction stands. And that could take months.

Inventor

So the delay tactic actually works?

Model

It works if the goal is simply to push the reckoning into the future. Whether it works legally—whether the courts ultimately side with the federation or the regulators—that's still being decided.

Quer a matéria completa? Leia o original em Clarin.com ↗
Fale Conosco FAQ