US launches major retaliatory strikes against ISIS in Syria, killing at least five

Two US soldiers and one US civilian killed in December 13 attack; at least five ISIS members killed in retaliatory strikes.
The group had reconstituted itself and maintained a presence in Syria's vast desert regions
Despite territorial defeat in 2019, ISIS continues to operate from remote areas, prompting sustained U.S. military operations.

Eight days after two American soldiers and a civilian were killed in Palmyra, the ancient Syrian crossroads city, the United States and Jordan struck more than seventy ISIS targets across the eastern desert in a coordinated overnight campaign. The retaliation was precise and deliberate — over a hundred munitions, five hours of bombardment, at least five militants killed — yet it unfolded against a backdrop that resists simple resolution: a group declared territorially defeated in 2019 has quietly endured in Syria's vast, ungoverned desert. The strikes are less an ending than a reminder that the work of containing violent extremism outlasts any single declaration of victory.

  • The December 13 killing of two US soldiers and a civilian contractor in Palmyra — the first such attack since Assad's fall — forced Washington to respond with unmistakable force.
  • Over five hours, American and Jordanian aircraft and artillery hammered more than seventy ISIS positions across the Badia desert, deploying over a hundred precision munitions in one of the most intensive strikes in the region in years.
  • The identity and motive of the Palmyra gunman remain contested — Syrian authorities say he was a dissident security force member with extremist views, while ISIS never claimed the attack, leaving the chain of responsibility deliberately murky.
  • The cell leader responsible for local drone operations was among those killed, and since the Palmyra attack, allied forces have conducted ten separate operations resulting in twenty-three militants killed or detained across Syria and Iraq.
  • Israel's simultaneous detention of a suspected ISIS operative in southern Syria and its ongoing incursions into the Golan buffer zone signal that the region's security architecture is being tested on multiple fronts at once.

On the morning of December 20, the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights confirmed that at least five Islamic State members had been killed overnight in a coordinated American and Jordanian strike campaign across eastern Syria. The operation was a direct response to an attack eight days earlier in Palmyra, where a gunman identified by the US military as a lone ISIS operative had shot dead two American soldiers and a civilian contractor.

President Trump called it "very serious retaliation." American forces struck more than seventy ISIS targets using fighter jets, attack helicopters, and artillery, deploying over a hundred precision munitions across the Badia desert and a mountainous corridor stretching north from Palmyra toward Deir Ezzor. Jordan confirmed its participation, framing the operation as essential to preventing extremists from using Syrian territory as a launchpad against neighboring states. The five-hour bombardment deliberately avoided civilian population centers, and no residents were reported displaced.

The December 13 attack had been notable for its ambiguity. It was the first such incident since Assad's fall, and Syrian authorities described the perpetrator as a security force member slated for dismissal over his extremist views — not a confirmed ISIS operative. The group itself never claimed responsibility. That uncertainty pointed to a deeper problem: despite its territorial defeat in 2019, ISIS had reconstituted itself in Syria's desert regions, where the terrain offers both cover and freedom of movement.

Among those killed in the strikes was the leader of a cell overseeing drone operations in the area. US Central Command noted that since the Palmyra attack, allied forces had conducted ten separate operations across Syria and Iraq, killing or detaining twenty-three militants. Syria's foreign ministry reaffirmed its commitment to denying ISIS any safe haven on Syrian soil.

The operation did not unfold in isolation. Israeli forces separately detained a suspected ISIS member in southern Syria, part of a broader pattern of Israeli incursions into the post-Assad security vacuum. The convergence of American strikes, Jordanian air power, and Israeli detention operations illustrated a region where counterterrorism remains an active, unfinished effort — one that no single campaign, however precise, has yet resolved.

On the morning of December 20, the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights confirmed what American and Jordanian warplanes had accomplished overnight: at least five members of the Islamic State had been killed in a coordinated strike campaign across eastern Syria. The operation was swift and deliberate—a response to an attack eight days earlier in Palmyra, the ancient desert city that sits at the crossroads of Syria's central plains, where two American soldiers and a civilian contractor had been shot dead by a gunman the U.S. military identified as a lone ISIS operative.

President Trump called it "very serious retaliation," and the numbers bore that out. American forces had struck more than seventy ISIS targets using fighter jets, attack helicopters, and artillery, deploying over one hundred precision munitions across a sprawling geography of desert and mountain. Jordan's military confirmed its participation in the raids, framing the operation as necessary to prevent extremist groups from using Syrian territory as a staging ground for attacks on neighboring countries. The bombardment lasted roughly five hours and focused on the vast Badia desert region, with particular intensity in a mountainous corridor running north from Palmyra toward Deir Ezzor province. A Syrian security official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the targets had been deliberately chosen away from civilian population centers, and that no residents had been displaced.

The December 13 attack itself had been unusual enough to warrant attention. It was the first such incident since Bashar al-Assad's fall from power just a year earlier, and Syrian authorities offered their own account of the perpetrator: a member of the security forces who had been scheduled for dismissal due to what they described as his "extremist Islamist ideas." ISIS itself had not claimed responsibility for the shooting. The ambiguity surrounding the attack's origins—whether it was a coordinated ISIS operation or the act of a radicalized individual—underscored a persistent reality: despite being territorially defeated in 2019, the group had reconstituted itself and maintained a presence in Syria's vast desert regions, where the terrain offered both concealment and mobility.

Rami Abdel Rahman, who heads the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, told international media that among those killed was the leader of a cell responsible for drone operations in the area. The strikes had targeted ISIS infrastructure and weapons caches across Homs, Deir Ezzor, and Raqa provinces. U.S. Central Command issued a formal statement detailing the scope of the operation, emphasizing the precision of the munitions used and the coordination with allied forces. Since the Palmyra attack, the statement noted, American and allied forces had conducted ten separate operations across Syria and Iraq, resulting in the deaths or detention of twenty-three militant operatives, though the statement did not specify which groups those individuals had belonged to.

The broader context was one of shifting security dynamics in Syria. American forces maintain a presence in the Kurdish-controlled northeast and at Al-Tanf, near the Jordanian border, as part of Operation Inherent Resolve, the international coalition effort against ISIS that has persisted since the group's territorial collapse. Jordan, which had been a key participant in that coalition and had made military bases available to American operations, had itself been targeted by ISIS attacks in the past. Syria's foreign ministry, while not directly addressing the strikes, issued a statement reaffirming the country's commitment to eliminating ISIS and preventing it from establishing safe havens on Syrian soil.

Meanwhile, a separate security development underscored the region's volatility. The Israeli military announced that on Wednesday it had detained a suspected ISIS member during an operation in the southern Syrian town of Rafid. The arrest came as part of a broader pattern: since Assad's overthrow, Israeli forces have moved into a UN-patrolled buffer zone on the Golan Heights and have conducted repeated incursions into southern Syria. The convergence of American strikes, Jordanian participation, Israeli detention operations, and ISIS's persistent desert presence painted a picture of a region where counterterrorism remained an active, ongoing concern—one that required coordination among multiple powers and sustained military operations to contain a threat that, despite years of effort, had not been fully eliminated.

Very serious retaliation, just as I promised, on the murderous terrorists responsible
— President Donald Trump
The bombardment was intense and lasted around five hours, with targets far from population centres
— Syrian security official
The Hearth Conversation Another angle on the story
Inventor

Why does an attack in Palmyra matter enough to trigger this kind of response? It's one incident, one gunman.

Model

Because it broke a pattern. For a year after Assad fell, there hadn't been a successful attack on American personnel in Syria. This one killed three people. It suggested ISIS had either the capability or the will—or both—to strike at U.S. forces again. That changes the calculus.

Inventor

The Syrian government says the shooter was one of their own security forces, not a true ISIS operative. Does that distinction matter?

Model

It matters for understanding what happened, but maybe less for why the U.S. responded. Whether it was a coordinated ISIS operation or a radicalized individual, the result was the same: Americans died. And the broader truth is that ISIS hasn't gone away. It's still there in the desert, still recruiting, still capable.

Inventor

Over a hundred precision munitions for seventy targets. That's a lot of firepower. Why such intensity?

Model

It wasn't just about punishment. It was about degradation. They hit infrastructure, weapons caches, drone cells. The goal was to set back ISIS's operational capacity, not just respond symbolically. And they coordinated with Jordan and involved multiple platforms—jets, helicopters, artillery. That takes planning.

Inventor

The strikes lasted five hours and hit targets across three provinces. How do you even coordinate something that dispersed?

Model

You need good intelligence first. You need to know where the targets are, what they are, when people will be there. Then you need the platforms in place and the timing synchronized. It's not improvised. This was planned before the Palmyra attack, probably, and executed with precision.

Inventor

No civilian displacement reported. Is that credible?

Model

The Syrian official said the targets were chosen away from population centers. In the Badia desert, that's possible—it's sparsely populated. But you can't verify that claim independently. What you can say is that no major humanitarian crisis was reported afterward, which suggests either the targeting was careful or the area really was empty.

Inventor

What happens next? Does this end the cycle?

Model

Unlikely. ISIS is still there. The U.S. is still there. The region is still unstable. This operation was retaliation and degradation, but it's not a solution. It's the kind of thing that will probably happen again.

Contact Us FAQ