Suicide Squad: Kill The Justice League review - brilliant writing buried under live service bloat

Flashes of brilliance buried so deep you have to excavate them
The reviewer describes how excellent writing and narrative moments are obscured by live service mechanics and open-world design.

In Metropolis and in the broader culture of game design, Rocksteady's Suicide Squad: Kill The Justice League arrives as a parable about creative vision constrained by commercial architecture. Released in early 2024, the game carries within it two distinct souls — one a sharp, character-driven deconstruction of superhero mythology, the other a live service machine built for engagement metrics and endless progression. That the better soul is clearly visible makes the compromise all the more melancholy.

  • A genuinely unsettling Batman encounter and King Shark's disarming warmth reveal a game with real creative ambition — and make the surrounding chaos harder to forgive.
  • Live service machinery floods every corner: cascading UI notifications, opaque loot systems, and a progression framework that seems designed to disorient rather than reward.
  • Movement and balance feel unresolved — a character with a jetpack somehow travels slower than one who simply jumps, and three of the four heroes are too fragile for the chaos the game throws at them.
  • The open world blurs mission types into indistinction, pulling players from tense, scripted story beats into aimless busywork with whiplash-inducing frequency.
  • Rocksteady's creative instincts are legible beneath the noise, but the live service framework has buried them so thoroughly that excavating the good requires tolerating the exhausting.

Suicide Squad: Kill The Justice League opens with a disorienting tutorial — full abilities, then a hard reset to the actual beginning — that turns out to be an accidental metaphor for the whole experience. The premise is strong: Brainiac has corrupted the Justice League, and four unpowered criminals are the only ones left to stop them.

When the writing takes center stage, the game earns its ambitions. King Shark delivers lines of earnest absurdism that land even as the world burns. Amanda Waller crackles with dark authority. An early Batman sequence unfolds like a horror film, the Dark Knight eliminating your squad one by one from the shadows — a genuine deconstruction of the superhero myth, and one of the more unsettling moments in recent superhero media. The game is also anchored in the Arkham timeline, meaning the Batman players grew to love is the same one now committing atrocities. When this choice lands, it lands hard.

But these moments are islands. The open world surrounding them is simultaneously undercooked and overstuffed — missions blur together, side content is indistinguishable from main objectives, and the UI buries players in loot tables and notifications that clarify nothing. The shooting is serviceable, but character balance is baffling, and the fragility of three of the four heroes turns chaotic fights into frustration.

The result is two games in constant, awkward collision: the tightly scripted Suicide Squad that Rocksteady clearly wanted to make, and the live service Suicide Squad built around grinding and progression. The studio's creative voice is audible throughout — but the framework has smothered it. The flashes of brilliance are real, and real enough to sting.

Suicide Squad: Kill The Justice League arrives with a genuinely strange opening—a tutorial that throws you into the middle of the action with a full arsenal of abilities before yanking you back to the actual beginning, where your ragtag crew of antiheroes sits in prison awaiting recruitment. The premise is solid: Brainiac has seized control of Metropolis and corrupted the Justice League itself, leaving four unpowered criminals as the only viable assault team. It's the kind of high-concept setup that should sing.

And for stretches, it does. The writing here is sharp. King Shark channels the earnest absurdism of James Gunn's film, landing some of the game's best lines while the world collapses around him. Amanda Waller, voiced by Debra Wilson, gets moments that crackle with authority and dark humor. An early encounter with Batman plays out like a horror sequence—the Dark Knight picking off your squad one by one from the shadows, each character eliminated in turn. It's genuinely unsettling, a deconstruction of the superhero mythos that lands with weight. These scripted moments, when they arrive, feel like the game Rocksteady Studios actually wanted to make.

But those moments are islands in an ocean of live service machinery. The bulk of your time unfolds in an open world that feels simultaneously undercooked and overstuffed. Missions blur together. Side activities are indistinguishable from main objectives. You're constantly wading through loot tables, skill trees, and UI elements that seem designed to confuse rather than clarify. The shooting itself is serviceable, but movement varies wildly by character—King Shark, inexplicably, jumps higher and travels faster than Deadshot, who has an actual jetpack. The other three characters operate with health pools so fragile that the chaotic open-world fights become exercises in frustration rather than fun.

The game's design philosophy appears fractured. There's the tightly scripted Suicide Squad—the one with excellent character work and narrative momentum. And then there's the live service Suicide Squad, the one obsessed with open-world busywork and endless progression systems. These two games collide constantly and awkwardly. You're pulled from a tense moment where bombs are literally embedded in your neck, only to be dropped into a sequence where you pilot a flying car to destroy some of Brainiac's crystals. The whiplash is constant. The overwhelming UI, the cascading notifications, the loot you're perpetually managing—it all adds up to exhaustion.

The game also makes a bold narrative choice by anchoring itself in the timeline of the Arkham games, meaning the Batman you grew to care about in those titles is the same one now slaughtering innocent civilians here. It's a legitimate deconstruction, the kind of superhero subversion we've seen attempted in The Boys and Jupiter's Legacy. When it works, it works well. But outside those scripted set pieces, the open world undermines everything. The game's disjointed opening—that confusing tutorial that leaves you wondering if you've glitched into the wrong section—turns out to be emblematic of the whole experience: an overstimulating exercise in confusion where solid ideas are buried so deep you have to excavate them.

Rocksteady has built something with real creative ambition here, and the character writing alone suggests the studio knew exactly what it wanted to say about these antiheroes and the corrupted heroes they're forced to fight. But the live service framework has smothered it. The flashes of brilliance are real, but they're so obscured by everything else—the grinding, the loot, the unclear objectives, the byzantine progression—that it's hard to recommend digging through the mess to find them. You're left wishing the studio had simply been allowed to make the game it clearly wanted to make, rather than the slightly messy compromise that exists.

An early encounter with Batman plays out like a horror segment, with each character picked off one by one as the Dark Knight strikes from the shadows
— Reviewer's description of the game's best moment
Amanda Waller declares that she's the daddy now—a moment that should get a Golden Joystick of some description
— Reviewer highlighting Debra Wilson's performance
A Conversa do Hearth Outra perspectiva sobre a história
Inventor

So the writing is genuinely good, but the game itself isn't fun. How does that even happen?

Model

It's a structural problem. Imagine a brilliant short film that keeps getting interrupted by a slot machine. The writing moments—King Shark's dialogue, that Batman encounter—those are real. But you spend maybe 20% of your time in those scripted sequences. The other 80% is open-world busywork where you're not sure if you're doing a mission or just wandering.

Inventor

Why would a studio do that? Why not just make the game they clearly wanted to make?

Model

Live service mandates. Publishers want engagement metrics, daily logins, progression systems, loot tables. It's not a creative choice—it's a business model imposed on top of the game. Rocksteady probably fought for those scripted moments, but they had to build around a framework that wasn't designed for them.

Inventor

The Batman thing seems risky. Isn't he a hero?

Model

He is, but the game deconstructs that. This is the same Batman from the Arkham games, and now he's been corrupted by Brainiac and is massacring civilians. It's genuinely unsettling. But that bold narrative choice gets lost in the noise of the open world.

Inventor

So if someone stripped away all the live service stuff, would this be a great game?

Model

Probably. You'd have a tight, well-written superhero story with real stakes and character depth. Instead, you have that story constantly interrupted by loot management and unclear objectives. The game's own design works against its best instincts.

Quer a matéria completa? Leia o original em TechRadar ↗
Fale Conosco FAQ