Stillbirth couple's fight for maternity reform after hospital errors

A baby girl (Lois) was stillborn at 04:26 on 6 September 2023 after clinical errors during labour, including delayed emergency C-section and inadequate fetal monitoring, leaving the family to grieve and plan a funeral instead of welcoming their newborn.
We are a family of four—even though it doesn't look like that.
Lauryn reflects on how her stillborn daughter Lois remains central to her family's identity, even in absence.

In the early hours of September 6th, 2023, a baby named Lois was stillborn at Luton and Dunstable Hospital after a series of clinical failures that an NHS investigation would later confirm were preventable. Her parents, Lauryn and Andrew McCready, arrived in good faith at an institution that was quietly overwhelmed — short-staffed, under-resourced, and unable to deliver the standard of care their daughter's life required. Now, having settled a negligence claim and given evidence to a national maternity inquiry, they carry their grief forward as testimony, hoping that what could not be saved in one room might yet protect lives in many others.

  • A baby girl was stillborn after clinicians delayed an emergency caesarean section that their own notes show was ordered but then downgraded — a sequence of decisions the family was never told about as it unfolded.
  • Eight vaginal examinations, inadequate fetal monitoring, absent senior oversight, and a midwife's remark that they had 'picked a bad day' paint a picture of a unit stretched far beyond its capacity to care.
  • The trust has acknowledged some failures and settled out of court, conceding that an earlier C-section would likely have delivered Lois alive — yet it stopped short of guaranteeing she would have been born healthy.
  • A CQC inspection as recently as January 2026 rated the same maternity unit as inadequate, with persistent staff shortages and continued delays in emergency procedures, casting doubt on whether any promised reforms are taking hold.
  • Lauryn has given evidence to the national Amos Inquiry and campaigns for an independent maternity commissioner, while the couple has raised over £31,000 for baby loss and bereavement charities in Lois's name.

Lauryn McCready arrived at Luton and Dunstable Hospital on the evening of September 4th, 2023, more than a week overdue and already two days into contractions. She and her husband Andrew had prepared carefully for this birth — a pregnancy that followed several miscarriages — and they came, as Lauryn puts it, with naive trust. What followed was 28 hours in maternity triage, eight vaginal examinations, overheard conversations about staff shortages, and a midwife's remark that they had "picked a bad day to have a baby" — a phrase that has never left them.

In the early hours of September 6th, the baby's heart rate began to drop. Medical notes show that an emergency caesarean section — a Category 1 procedure meant to occur within 30 minutes — was called at around 3:30 a.m. The McCreadys say they were never informed. The procedure was downgraded. Forty-five minutes later, when no heartbeat could be detected, the decision was made to deliver immediately. Lauryn was rushed into theatre. She remembers the room going quiet, then an alarm, then people flooding in. She kept asking whether anyone knew if the baby was a girl or a boy.

Lois was born at 4:26 a.m. with no heartbeat. Resuscitation efforts lasted 25 minutes. When staff told the couple their daughter was not responding and that they would stop, Lauryn screamed no. A post mortem found that Lois had died from sudden, severe oxygen deprivation, likely caused by inhaling her first stool combined with bacterial infection. The family was escorted back through the labour ward — past other women giving birth — to a private room.

They spent four days in hospital with Lois, bathing her, reading to her, making casts of her hands and feet. Then they went home to a house full of baby things and planned a funeral. An independent NHS investigation identified multiple failures: delayed caesarean decision, inadequate fetal monitoring, poor record-keeping, midwives not escalating concerns, and excessive examinations that raised infection risk. In 2025, the trust settled a negligence claim out of court, acknowledging some mistakes and conceding that an earlier C-section would, on the balance of probabilities, have delivered Lois alive.

The trust's chief executive expressed sorrow and outlined an action plan. But the most recent CQC inspection, from January 2026, again rated the maternity unit as inadequate — documenting staff shortages, low morale, and continued delays in emergency procedures. Andrew believes the crisis is governmental in scale. Lauryn has given evidence to the Amos Inquiry, a national maternity review, and supports the campaign for an independent UK-wide maternity commissioner.

Since losing Lois, the couple have had another daughter, Iris. Lois remains part of their family identity — "We are a family of four," Lauryn says, "even though it doesn't look like that." In her memory, they have raised £7,600 for Abigail's Footsteps, which provides cooling cots to hospitals, and £24,000 for baby loss charity Tommy's. Their hope is that the failures which took their daughter will not be allowed to take another.

Lauryn McCready was more than a week overdue when she arrived at Luton and Dunstable Hospital on the evening of September 4th, 2023, contractions already underway for two days. She and her husband Andrew had spent months preparing for their daughter's arrival, a pregnancy that had come after several miscarriages. They arrived with what Lauryn describes as naive trust—the belief that they were in safe hands and that everything would unfold as planned. Instead, they would spend the next 28 hours in the maternity triage unit watching their labour fail to progress, enduring eight vaginal examinations, and overhearing staff conversations about shortages and absent colleagues. A midwife's offhand remark—"You picked a bad day to have a baby"—would become a phrase that haunts them still.

At just after two in the morning on September 6th, staff detected the baby's heart rate dropping. During a cervical examination, Lauryn's waters broke. An obstetrician reviewed her case and, according to medical notes, called for an emergency caesarean section at approximately 3:30 a.m.—a Category 1 procedure meant to happen within 30 minutes. The McCreadys say they were never told of this call or its urgency. The operation was then downgraded. Forty-five minutes later, when clinicians could no longer detect a heartbeat, the decision came to deliver the baby immediately. What followed was a sudden shift from waiting to chaos. Lauryn was rushed into theatre, where she remembers the room going quiet, then an alarm sounding, then people flooding in. She kept asking if anyone knew whether the baby was a girl or a boy.

Lois was born at 4:26 a.m. with no heartbeat. Medical staff attempted to resuscitate her for 25 minutes while Andrew watched the minutes stretch into what felt like hours, hope draining with each passing moment. When they were told their daughter was not responding and resuscitation efforts would stop, Lauryn screamed no. A post mortem examination revealed that Lois had died from sudden, severe oxygen deprivation to her vital organs—likely caused by inhaling her first stool combined with bacterial infection. The couple were then escorted from theatre back through the labour ward, past other women giving birth, to a private room. A nurse told Lauryn that if she held Lois close, no one would know the difference—they would think she was like any other mother with her baby. "I just want to be like any other mum and baby," Lauryn remembers thinking.

They spent four days in hospital with their daughter, bathing her, reading to her, making casts of her hands and feet, welcoming family to visit. Then they had to say goodbye and return home to a house full of baby things they could not yet face, to plan a funeral instead of entering the newborn bubble they had imagined. An independent NHS maternity safety investigation identified multiple failures in Lauryn's care: a delayed decision to perform a caesarean section, inadequate monitoring of the baby's heartbeat, poor record-keeping and risk assessments, midwives failing to raise concerns with obstetricians, and excessive vaginal examinations that increased infection risk. The trust later settled a medical negligence claim out of court in 2025, acknowledging some mistakes while denying others. It conceded that had a C-section been performed earlier, "on the balance of probabilities," Lois would have been born alive—though it stopped short of saying she would have been born healthy.

The trust's chief executive expressed sorrow for the loss and for acknowledged mistakes, citing an action plan to address the problems: improving early labour care, strengthening risk assessment and record-keeping, ensuring senior doctors review delayed cases, and supporting staff to raise concerns. Yet Lauryn finds it difficult to hear promises of change when the most recent CQC inspection, from January 2026, again rated the hospital's maternity services as inadequate. Inspectors documented persistent staff shortages, low morale, failures to investigate and learn from incidents, and continued delays in performing emergency procedures. Andrew believes the problem extends beyond individual hospitals and midwives—it is a government-level crisis. Lauryn has given evidence to the Amos Inquiry, a national review of maternity care, hoping her family's experience will drive systemic improvement. She supports the campaign for an independent UK-wide commissioner for maternity services and advocates for better education so pregnant women understand their choices and can speak up for themselves.

Since Lois's death, the couple have had another daughter, Iris. But Lois remains woven into their family identity. "She will grow up knowing that she has a big sister," Lauryn says. "We are a family of four—even though it doesn't look like that." One small mercy stands out: the hospital had a cooling cot, a specialized device that allowed them to spend those four precious days with their daughter. Not every hospital has one—they are provided by donations, not mandated—which the McCreadys find baffling. Since losing Lois, they have raised £7,600 for Abigail's Footsteps, which provides these beds to hospitals, and £24,000 for Tommy's, a baby loss charity. Their fight now is to ensure that the failures that took their daughter do not take another family's child, and that the promises of reform actually materialize.

You picked a bad day to have a baby
— A midwife to Lauryn McCready on the evening she arrived in labour
The longer it went on, the hope was getting lower. The 25 minutes felt like 25 hours.
— Andrew McCready, describing the resuscitation attempts on their daughter
A Conversa do Hearth Outra perspectiva sobre a história
Inventor

What strikes you most about their story—the clinical failures, or the way the hospital treated them afterward?

Model

Both, but differently. The failures are documented and damning. But what lingers is the phrase "you picked a bad day to have a baby." It's casual cruelty born from exhaustion, and it became a wound that never closed. That's what systemic failure looks like at the human level.

Inventor

They settled the negligence claim. Does that feel like justice to them?

Model

Not really. Andrew describes the legal process as reopening a healing wound and pouring salt on it. Money doesn't restore what was lost. What they want is for the hospital to actually change, and for other families not to go through this. The settlement was acknowledgment, not closure.

Inventor

The trust says it has an action plan. Why doesn't Lauryn believe it?

Model

Because the most recent inspection still rates maternity services as inadequate. Staff shortages persist. Delays continue. Words on paper mean nothing if the conditions that created the crisis haven't changed. She's watched promises fail to materialize.

Inventor

What does a cooling cot have to do with any of this?

Model

It's a symbol of how fragmented the system is. These devices aren't mandated—they're provided by charity donations. Families who lose babies should have access to time with them. That shouldn't depend on which hospital you're in or which charity has fundraised enough. It's a small thing that reveals a much larger indifference.

Inventor

They've had another daughter since. Does that change the grief?

Model

It doesn't erase it. Lauryn says they're a family of four, even though it doesn't look that way. Iris will grow up knowing she has a big sister. The loss doesn't get smaller; it just gets integrated into who they are.

Quer a matéria completa? Leia o original em BBC News ↗
Fale Conosco FAQ