Chinese Rocket, Not SpaceX, Set to Strike Moon in March

A booster from that mission would naturally end up on a lunar collision course
Gray realized the Chinese rocket's trajectory matched the impending moon strike far better than the SpaceX booster he'd initially identified.

A piece of space debris, long misidentified and silently orbiting since 2014, is now on a final course toward the moon — a quiet reminder that what we launch into the cosmos does not simply disappear. The object, now believed to be a spent Chinese Chang'e 5-T1 rocket booster, will strike the lunar far side on March 4, unseen by any human eye. Its story is less about danger than about the limits of our certainty, and the slow, collaborative work of correcting what we think we know.

  • An amateur astronomer's announcement that a SpaceX rocket was headed for the moon sent ripples of excitement and concern through the space community — before the identification unraveled entirely.
  • A single question from a NASA engineer was enough to crack open seven years of assumed certainty, forcing a full re-examination of the object's origins.
  • The physics of the originally suspected rocket's trajectory simply didn't fit — it had never passed close enough to the moon to end up on a collision course with it.
  • Evidence now points convincingly to a Chinese booster from a 2014 lunar flyby mission, whose path aligns far more naturally with the rogue object's arc through space.
  • The impact will happen in silence on the moon's far side, invisible from Earth, though future lunar orbiters may one day photograph the scar it leaves behind.

In early February, amateur astronomer Bill Gray announced that a spent rocket was on course to strike the moon on March 4. He believed it was a SpaceX booster launched in 2015, and the news spread quickly — some in the space community were intrigued by the prospect of a new crater, others troubled by the growing problem of orbital debris.

Three days later, Gray reversed himself. After a nudge from Jon Giorgini, an engineer at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, he went back through his archives and found he could not confirm his original identification. The object, cataloged as WE0913A by the Catalina Sky Survey in 2015, had been misidentified for seven years.

The problem was the physics. The Deep Space Climate Observatory — whose booster Gray had initially suspected — was launched on a trajectory that never brought it near the moon. It would be difficult to explain how its rocket stage ended up aimed at the lunar surface. When Giorgini raised this inconsistency, the original identification collapsed under scrutiny.

Gray now believes the object is almost certainly the spent booster from China's Chang'e 5-T1 mission, launched in October 2014 on a trajectory that looped around the moon — a path that matches the rogue object's arc far more closely. He acknowledged the evidence was circumstantial, but found it convincing.

The impact carries no risk to Earth. The booster will strike Hertzsprung crater on the moon's permanently hidden far side, beyond any direct human observation. Future lunar orbiters may eventually image the site, offering scientists a rare opportunity to study what happens when human-made debris meets the lunar surface.

In early February, amateur astronomer Bill Gray announced that a piece of space debris was headed for the moon. He believed it was a spent SpaceX rocket, launched in 2015, and it would strike the lunar surface on March 4. The news rippled through the space community—archaeologists grew excited at the prospect of a new crater, while others fretted about the mounting problem of orbital junk.

Then, three days later, Gray walked it back. After digging through old data and receiving a nudge from Jon Giorgini, an engineer at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, he realized he had misidentified the object. It wasn't a SpaceX booster at all. It was a Chinese rocket stage, one that had been hurtling through space since 2014.

The object itself had been spotted years earlier. On March 14, 2015, the Catalina Sky Survey—a program using telescopes at Arizona's Steward Observatory to hunt for near-Earth asteroids—picked it up and cataloged it as WE0913A. Gray had initially concluded it was the second stage of the rocket that launched NASA and NOAA's Deep Space Climate Observatory satellite. That identification held for seven years, until Gray published his post about the impending lunar impact. The prospect of a SpaceX rocket crashing into the moon made for good headlines.

But the physics didn't quite fit. The Deep Space Climate Observatory was sent on a trajectory that never brought it close to the moon, so it would be strange for its booster to end up on a collision course with the lunar surface. When Giorgini raised this concern, Gray went back to his archives from 2015 to confirm his original identification. He couldn't. The evidence simply wasn't there.

Instead, Gray concluded the object was almost certainly the spent booster from China's Chang'e 5-T1 mission, launched on October 23, 2014. That mission was designed to fly around the moon—a trajectory that matched the rogue object's path far more closely than the Deep Space Climate Observatory rocket would have. Gray acknowledged the evidence remained circumstantial, but he considered it fairly convincing.

The impact itself poses no danger to Earth. The booster is expected to strike a crater on the moon's far side called Hertzsprung on March 4. No one on Earth will witness the collision directly. The far side of the moon is permanently turned away from us, hidden from view. But future spacecraft orbiting the moon may eventually photograph the impact site, giving scientists a chance to study the crater and learn more about what happens when human-made objects collide with the lunar surface.

In a sense, this remains circumstantial evidence, but I would regard it as fairly convincing evidence.
— Bill Gray, amateur astronomer
A Conversa do Hearth Outra perspectiva sobre a história
Inventor

Why did Gray initially think it was a SpaceX rocket?

Model

Because when he first identified the object back in 2015, he matched it to the booster that launched the Deep Space Climate Observatory. That was a reasonable conclusion at the time. It wasn't until someone questioned the trajectory that he realized the math didn't work.

Inventor

And the Chinese rocket fit better?

Model

Much better. The Chang'e 5-T1 mission was designed to go around the moon. A booster from that mission would naturally end up on a lunar collision course. The Deep Space Climate Observatory went somewhere else entirely.

Inventor

How long had this object been misidentified?

Model

Seven years. It was discovered in 2015, and Gray's original identification stood until February 2022, when he published the impact prediction.

Inventor

Does it matter that it's Chinese rather than American?

Model

It mattered for the headlines. A SpaceX rocket hitting the moon is a bigger story. But scientifically, it's the same problem—space junk on a collision course. The source doesn't suggest any geopolitical dimension.

Inventor

Will we see the impact?

Model

No. It's hitting the far side of the moon, the side that always faces away from Earth. But lunar orbiters might photograph the crater afterward, which could be valuable for understanding impact dynamics.

Inventor

What does this say about tracking space debris?

Model

It shows how hard it is. An object can be cataloged, misidentified, and circulate in databases for years before anyone realizes the mistake. We're getting better at it, but there's still a lot of guesswork involved.

Quer a matéria completa? Leia o original em CNET ↗
Fale Conosco FAQ