Seven-year-old faces paralysis after US airstrike; US denies civilian casualties

A seven-year-old boy and two siblings were struck by shrapnel in US airstrikes that killed at least 12 civilians; the boy faces permanent disability without unaffordable surgery.
It is the Americans who are responsible for our suffering
A mother whose son faces permanent disability from shrapnel lodged in his body after a US airstrike her government refuses to acknowledge.

Abdiqadir Salah was struck by shrapnel during November 2025 airstrikes in Jamaame, Somalia that killed at least 12 civilians including eight children. The US military denies civilian casualties occurred and has scrapped compensation programs, leaving injured families without recourse or financial support.

  • Abdiqadir Salah, age 7, struck by shrapnel in November 2025 airstrikes in Jamaame, Somalia
  • At least 12 civilians killed, including 8 children; deadliest strike on civilians in Somalia during Trump administrations
  • Surgery costs £750; family cannot afford it; US refuses to acknowledge civilian casualties or pay compensation
  • Shrapnel lodged near hip socket threatens boy's ability to walk without urgent removal
  • Pentagon has scrapped legal requirement to prevent and respond to civilian deaths

A Somali boy injured in a US airstrike that killed 12 civilians needs emergency surgery to avoid losing his ability to walk, but his family cannot afford the $750 operation and the US refuses to acknowledge civilian casualties.

Abdiqadir Salah was seven years old when shrapnel tore through his body on a street in Jamaame, Somalia. It was November 15, 2025. His mother, Marian Haji Abdi Guled, was nearby when the missiles came. She would later describe the moment with the precision of someone who lived through it: three of her children bleeding on the ground, shells falling everywhere, no warning, only the sound of drones hovering overhead before the strikes began.

The attack killed at least twelve civilians that day, eight of them children. It remains the deadliest strike on civilians in Somalia during either Trump administration and ranks among the worst incidents since the 1993 Black Hawk Down operation in Mogadishu. The stated target was al-Shabaab, the Islamist militant group that controls territory in the region. What happened instead was that a mother watched her three children get wounded in the street outside their home.

Abdiqadir's older brother Mohamed, sixteen, had shrapnel lodged in his fingers. His sister Sumaya, fourteen, had three metal fragments embedded in her head—those were eventually removed. But Abdiqadir's injuries proved more serious. X-rays showed shrapnel still lodged near his hip socket, having entered through his lower back. Doctors at Kaafi hospital in Mogadishu, where the family eventually made their way after a harrowing two-day journey without food, delivered a stark assessment: the shrapnel needed to be removed urgently. Without surgery, the boy risked losing his ability to walk.

The operation costs £750. Guled does not have it. After the strike, she fled with her wounded children into the countryside, terrified the drones would return. The next day she borrowed money for a journey to Jilib, sixty kilometers away, hoping a hospital there could help. It could not. Then came the longer journey to Mogadishu, Somalia's capital, the only place equipped to perform the surgery her son needs. She left her eldest son behind in Jamaame because she could not afford to bring all three children. She left her husband there too, on the farm, to protect their crops.

Now she lives in Mogadishu with Abdiqadir and Sumaya, paying nearly £190 a month for accommodation—a sum that makes it mathematically impossible to save for the surgery. "I don't know where the money will come from," she said. "What's worse than being a mother who can't do anything for her wounded children?"

The US military has not paid compensation to any Somali civilians injured or killed in airstrikes. Under the current administration, the Pentagon has quietly dismantled a program that made it a legal requirement to prevent and respond to civilian deaths. When asked detailed questions about the Jamaame strikes, the Department of War did not respond. US officials would not answer questions about the role of Somali ground forces in the operation, though witness testimony consistently describes the casualties as caused by bombs dropped from drones, not ground fire.

Guled has no uncertainty about who is responsible. "It is the Americans who are responsible for our suffering," she said. The shrapnel in her son's body tells the same story. Without surgery, Abdiqadir Salah will likely spend the rest of his life unable to walk properly—a permanent consequence of an airstrike his country's government refuses to acknowledge happened at all.

They told me if the shrapnel isn't removed from his body, it could affect his ability to continue walking. But I don't have $1,000 needed for the operation. What's worse than being a mother who can't do anything for her wounded children?
— Marian Haji Abdi Guled, Abdiqadir's mother
It is the Americans who are responsible for our suffering.
— Marian Haji Abdi Guled
La Conversación del Hearth Otra perspectiva de la historia
Inventor

Why does the US denial of civilian casualties matter if the injuries are documented and real?

Model

Because denial blocks accountability. Without acknowledgment, there's no legal obligation to compensate, no mechanism for families to seek help, no pressure to change targeting procedures. The denial is the policy.

Inventor

Could the shrapnel have come from Somali ground forces instead?

Model

The witnesses all say no—they describe bombs from drones, not mortar fire. And Guled, who lived through it, is certain. But the US won't answer questions about it, which itself is telling.

Inventor

What happens to Abdiqadir if he doesn't get the surgery?

Model

Permanent paralysis or severe mobility loss. He's seven. That's his entire life changed because his family can't afford £750 and no one will take responsibility.

Inventor

Is there any path to getting the money?

Model

Not that's visible. She's trapped in Mogadishu paying rent she can barely afford, unable to work, unable to leave, unable to save. The surgery is out of reach.

Inventor

Why did the US target that location?

Model

They said al-Shabaab was there. But a Guardian investigation found the targeting raises serious questions about intelligence and how the targets were selected. Children were hit in the open, likely clearly identifiable to the drone operators.

Inventor

What does it mean that the Pentagon scrapped the civilian casualty prevention program?

Model

It means there's no longer a legal requirement to even try to prevent this. It's a formal abandonment of accountability.

Quieres la nota completa? Lee el original en The Guardian ↗
Contáctanos FAQ