Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs S25 Ultra: Incremental upgrades at premium price

The improvements are real but incremental.
Samsung's S26 Ultra offers meaningful upgrades in charging and cameras, but not enough to justify upgrading from the S25 Ultra.

Each year, the flagship smartphone cycle asks the same quiet question: when does incremental progress become meaningful change? Samsung's Galaxy S26 Ultra arrives at the same $1,299 threshold as its predecessor, carrying genuine but modest improvements — faster charging, a wider camera aperture, a novel privacy screen, and a processor that may finally challenge Apple's benchmark dominance. It is a phone that refines rather than reimagines, and in doing so, it reveals as much about the nature of technological maturity as it does about any single device.

  • The S26 Ultra launches at the same $1,299 price as last year's model, immediately raising the stakes for justifying an upgrade.
  • A new Privacy Display darkens the screen from side angles, addressing a quietly universal anxiety about public phone use that no flagship has tackled before.
  • The Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 posts benchmark numbers that could finally surpass Apple's A19 Pro — a milestone no Android chip has reached.
  • Camera and charging improvements are real but measured: a wider aperture promises brighter photos, and 60W wired charging restores 75% battery in 30 minutes.
  • S25 Ultra owners face little urgency, especially with last year's flagship available refurbished for as low as $789 — making the upgrade calculus more personal than technical.

Samsung's Galaxy S26 Ultra arrives this week carrying a familiar price — $1,299 for the base model — and a familiar dilemma for anyone already holding last year's flagship. The spec sheet tells a story of restraint: the same 6.9-inch 120Hz display, the same 5,000 mAh battery, the same camera resolution and zoom range. But the changes Samsung made around the edges are more interesting than a raw comparison suggests.

The most novel addition is Privacy Display, which darkens the screen when viewed from the side — a feature that sounds niche until you consider how often a phone is read by strangers in public. It's toggleable per app or screen region, giving users genuine control. The camera system also received a meaningful tweak: a wider main lens aperture lets in more light, with Samsung claiming 47% brighter shots on the main lens and notable low-light gains. The front camera now benefits from the same AI processing engine as the rear cameras, a long-overdue correction.

Charging sees a real jump, with 60W wired speeds restoring 75% of the battery in 30 minutes, up from 65% on the S25 Ultra. Wireless charging climbs from 15W to 25W via the Qi 2.2 standard. The processor is where Samsung is placing its biggest bet — the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 posts benchmark numbers that reportedly rival Apple's A19 Pro, a threshold no Snapdragon chip has previously crossed.

Design changes are subtle: slightly thinner, lighter, with more curved corners and a camera module that sits more flush with the body. Samsung swapped the titanium frame for Armor Aluminum, a durability trade-off that real-world use will have to settle. AI features expand Bixby's role as an autonomous agent and deepen Google Gemini integration for automated tasks across apps.

For S25 Ultra owners, the honest answer is that nothing here demands action — the improvements are genuine but unhurried. For everyone else, the S26 Ultra is almost certainly an excellent phone. Whether it's worth $1,299 over a refurbished S25 Ultra at $789 is a question only personal priorities can answer.

Samsung's new flagship phone arrived this week with a familiar price tag and a question that will sound increasingly tired to anyone who buys premium phones: Is this year's model actually worth the jump?

The Galaxy S26 Ultra starts at $1,299 for the base 256GB model, exactly where the S25 Ultra launched a year ago. On paper, the differences look modest. The display is the same 6.9-inch panel running at 120Hz. The battery capacity hasn't budged from 5,000 mAh. The camera resolution and zoom capabilities are unchanged. But Samsung has made enough moves around the edges that the question of whether to upgrade isn't quite as simple as the spec sheet suggests.

The most tangible hardware change is the Privacy Display, a new feature that darkens the screen when viewed from the side, making it difficult for someone standing next to you to read what's on your phone. It's customizable too—you can toggle it on per app, or just for specific parts of the screen like your notifications. It's the kind of feature that sounds niche until you realize how often you hold your phone in public spaces where strangers can see it.

The camera system got a meaningful tweak. Samsung widened the main lens aperture from 1.7 to 1.4, which means more light reaches the sensor. The company claims this will make photos 47 percent brighter on the main lens and 37 percent brighter on the telephoto camera, with particular improvements in low light. The front-facing camera, previously a bit of an afterthought, now gets the same AI image processing and object-aware engine that Samsung uses on the rear cameras, which should make selfies look more like actual people and less like processed approximations.

Charging has gotten faster. The S26 Ultra supports 60W wired charging, which Samsung says will restore 75 percent of the battery in 30 minutes—a meaningful jump from the 65 percent the S25 Ultra advertised. Wireless charging also improved, moving from 15W to 25W thanks to the Qi 2.2 standard. The battery itself remains the same capacity, but Samsung claims the new batteries are more efficient, and the upgraded processor should help stretch battery life further. Until Tom's Guide tests it in the lab, though, it's hard to know if the S26 Ultra will actually outlast the S25 Ultra's measured 17 hours and 14 minutes.

The processor is where Samsung is banking on real performance gains. The new Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy chip showed impressive benchmark results in testing—3,832 in single-core Geekbench tests and 12,208 in multi-core, compared to the S25 Ultra's 3,031 and 9,829. In graphics-intensive tests, the new chip hit 55.31 frames per second versus the S25 Ultra's 42.36 fps. Leaked benchmarks suggest this chip might finally outpace Apple's A19 Pro in every test, something no Snapdragon has managed before.

The design changes are subtle. The S26 Ultra is slightly thinner and lighter than its predecessor, with more curved corners that align it visually with the rest of the S26 lineup. Samsung ditched the titanium frame in favor of Armor Aluminum, a move that raises durability questions until real-world testing answers them. The camera bump now takes inspiration from the Z Fold 7, with a more integrated look rather than protruding lenses. The display got a ProScaler upgrade with new algorithms that Samsung claims will make the screen sharper and more vivid, with four times as many colors as the S25 Ultra, plus an anti-reflective coating to cut glare.

AI features round out the package. Bixby is now positioned as an AI agent that can handle tasks on your behalf. Google's Gemini integration enables automated app actions—booking an Uber, ordering food from DoorDash or Instacart. There's a new Circle to Search feature that can organize or search for multiple objects at once, and Photo Assist lets you edit images with voice and text prompts. Samsung also added call screening, third-party support for audio erasing, and an AI document scanner with auto-organization.

The real question isn't whether the S26 Ultra is a good phone—it almost certainly is. It's whether someone who bought the S25 Ultra a year ago has any reason to care. The improvements are real but incremental. The Privacy Display is genuinely novel. The camera aperture and charging speed are meaningful upgrades. But none of it screams urgency. The S25 Ultra, which can now be found refurbished for as little as $789, remains one of the best Android phones available. For anyone already holding last year's flagship, the S26 Ultra is an easy pass. For everyone else, it depends on what matters most—and whether you're willing to pay $1,299 to find out.

Samsung claims the S26 Ultra will be 47% brighter on the main lens and 37% brighter on the 50MP telephoto camera
— Samsung
The Hearth Conversation Another angle on the story
Inventor

So Samsung kept the same price but changed almost nothing about the phone itself. Why should anyone care?

Model

Because the things that did change are actually useful. The camera aperture is wider, so photos are brighter. Charging is faster. And the Privacy Display is something people have been asking for—a way to keep your screen private in public without turning the phone off.

Inventor

But those sound like nice-to-haves, not reasons to upgrade if you already have the S25 Ultra.

Model

Exactly. That's the honest answer. If you bought last year's model, you're fine. Samsung isn't forcing you to upgrade. But if you're buying a flagship phone for the first time, the S26 Ultra is the better choice.

Inventor

What about the processor? The benchmarks look impressive.

Model

They are. The new Snapdragon chip is genuinely faster, and it might finally beat Apple's processor in every test. But real-world performance? We won't know until we test it. Faster benchmarks don't always mean faster phones in daily use.

Inventor

So what's the real story here?

Model

Samsung made a competent phone that's slightly better than last year's in specific ways, but not so much better that it justifies the price for people who already have the previous model. It's a phone for people who want the newest thing, not people who need it.

Contact Us FAQ