Nearly 200,000 Serbs march in Belgrade demanding Vucic's ouster, backing student uprising

Whatever happens to them, we follow them.
A 62-year-old war veteran explains why he joined the student-led uprising after decades of silence.

Second-largest protest since Yugoslavia's fall demonstrates broad coalition: war veterans, students, and citizens united against democratic erosion and institutional decay under Vucic's 12-year rule. Student movement catalyzed generational reckoning; older Serbians acknowledge failure to reform earlier, allowing press suppression and corruption to flourish under the ruling Progressive Party.

  • Nearly 200,000 people marched in Belgrade
  • Second-largest protest since Yugoslavia's fall
  • Student movement began 18 months before the march
  • Aleksandar Vucic's Progressive Party has governed for 12 years
  • Demands centered on early elections and democratic reform

Nearly 200,000 Serbians protested in Belgrade demanding early elections and supporting an 18-month student-led movement against President Aleksandar Vucic's authoritarian governance and endemic corruption.

Nearly two hundred thousand people filled the streets of Belgrade on a single day, demanding that their president step down and call new elections. It was the second-largest demonstration since Yugoslavia's dictatorship collapsed decades earlier—a measure of how far the country had drifted, and how suddenly people had decided to say no.

The students had started it eighteen months before. They blocked schools. They occupied public squares. They refused to leave until the government agreed to hold elections ahead of schedule. What began as a student uprising became something larger: a generational reckoning, a moment when people who had lived through war and authoritarianism looked at what their country had become and recognized they could not stay silent anymore.

Zoran Milovanov was sixty-two years old. He had fought in the Yugoslav wars of the 1990s, sent to the front lines by politicians who ordered him to kill people he called brothers. For three decades he had carried that weight. Then, in the last twelve years, he watched Aleksandar Vucic and his Progressive Party dismantle what remained of democratic life in Serbia. The free press shrank. Institutions weakened. Corruption became not an exception but the ordinary way things worked. And Milovanov, like many of his generation, had largely accepted it. He had stayed quiet.

When the students began their uprising, something shifted in him. He understood, finally, that his silence had been a choice—and that choice had consequences. His generation had failed to reform Serbia when they had the chance. They had allowed the space for authoritarianism to take root. Now, watching young people risk their futures to demand change, Milovanov made a different choice. He joined them. "We are war veterans and we are here to protect the students," he said. "Whatever happens to them, we follow them." He felt the weight of guilt for having waited so long, but he also felt something else: the possibility that it was not yet too late.

The march itself was a coalition that would have been unthinkable months earlier. War veterans marched alongside university students. Parents walked with their children. People who had given up on politics stood beside those who had never known anything but Vucic's rule. They came because they recognized, in the students' refusal to accept the way things were, a mirror of their own buried conviction that Serbia could be different.

What made the moment significant was not just its size but its composition. This was not a single constituency demanding a single thing. This was a society saying, across generational lines and across the divide between those who remembered Yugoslavia and those who did not, that the current arrangement was unsustainable. Vucic had governed for twelve years by managing competing interests, by controlling media narratives, by making corruption seem inevitable. The march suggested that strategy had finally exhausted itself.

The students had given the country permission to hope. They had said, plainly and repeatedly, that early elections were possible, that a different political force could emerge, that the future did not have to look like the past twelve years. And when they said it, people listened. War veterans who thought their moment had passed found themselves marching again, this time not for a nation but for a democracy. That was the story the streets of Belgrade were telling: that sometimes, when young people refuse to accept the world as it is, older people remember why they should refuse it too.

We are war veterans and we are here to protect the students. Whatever happens to them, we follow them.
— Zoran Milovanov, 62-year-old war veteran
We feel guilty for having stayed silent so long.
— Zoran Milovanov, reflecting on his generation's failure to reform Serbia earlier
A Conversa do Hearth Outra perspectiva sobre a história
Inventor

Why did it take eighteen months of student protests before the broader public joined in?

Model

Because people had learned to live with disappointment. The students had to prove first that refusal was possible, that you could say no and not simply disappear. Once they did that, others recognized permission they didn't know they were waiting for.

Inventor

Milovanov mentions guilt about staying silent. Is that what moved him to march, or was it something else?

Model

Both. The guilt was real—he'd accepted a system he now saw clearly was wrong. But the students offered him something more than guilt: they offered him a way to act on it. That's what transforms guilt into movement.

Inventor

The article mentions the Progressive Party has eroded democratic institutions over twelve years. How visible was that erosion to ordinary people?

Model

It wasn't sudden. Press freedom didn't vanish overnight. Corruption didn't announce itself. It accumulated like sediment. People noticed, but they also normalized it. The students refusing to normalize it anymore—that's what made the erosion suddenly visible again.

Inventor

What does a march of two hundred thousand people actually accomplish?

Model

It tells the government that the cost of continuing as before has changed. It tells people who felt alone that they aren't. It creates a moment where different futures seem possible instead of inevitable. Whether that translates into actual change depends on what happens next.

Inventor

Do you think Vucic will call early elections?

Model

I don't know. But I know that two hundred thousand people in the street is a fact he cannot ignore, and that changes the calculation he has to make.

Quer a matéria completa? Leia o original em Público ↗
Fale Conosco FAQ