Nex Playground's flawed motion tracking can't stop kids from having fun

Fun isn't all about quality of execution.
The reviewer reflects on why a technically flawed device still captivates children despite its limitations.

In an era defined by graphical fidelity and processing power, a small cube of a console has quietly reminded us that joy is not a function of technical sophistication. The Nex Playground, a $250 motion-tracking device with tracking limitations that predate the Obama administration, has nonetheless made sick children beg to play and reluctant grandparents lean forward with interest. It is a flawed object that stumbles into a deeper truth: that the body's desire to move, to be seen, to play together, is older and more insistent than any hardware specification.

  • A $250 console with an $89-a-year subscription somehow outsold Xbox for two weeks — despite tracking worse than a Wii from 2006.
  • Its single camera loses limbs mid-swing, merges two children into one digital ghost, and demands players strip off patterned pajamas just to bowl a virtual ball.
  • Tears were shed — a stolen turn, a gutter ball caused by a vanishing hand, a puppy that wouldn't cooperate — and the living room had to be cleared of all bystanders like a crime scene.
  • And yet: a fever-ridden five-year-old begged to play, a father-in-law who never joins in wanted in, and dinner erupted into spontaneous chants of 'Bowling!!! I love bowling!!!'
  • The device is navigating its limitations not through technical improvement but through sheer physical accessibility — no controller, just your body, a big screen, and the ancient human instinct to move and be silly together.
  • It lands not as a triumph of engineering but as an accidental proof of concept: fun is more about invitation than execution.

A three-inch cube that costs $250 upfront and $89 a year to unlock most of its library has somehow outsold Microsoft's Xbox for two weeks running. The Nex Playground tracks your body with a single wide-angle camera that cannot perceive depth — inferior to the Nintendo Wii's infrared wand and leagues behind Microsoft Kinect's skeletal mapping. It identifies six joints. It loses limbs. It mistakes two children for one. It demands you avoid patterned clothing, long sleeves, and backlighting — conditions that become absurd the moment your kids want to play in their unicorn pajamas after a bath.

The failures are real and frequent. A nine-year-old raising her hand accidentally stole her five-year-old sister's bowling turn; the youngest cried for several minutes. Then the eldest's hand vanished mid-swing and sent her ball into the gutter — twice — and she got angry. The company's own warnings read like a checklist of things families cannot control: clear the room of non-players, roll up sleeves, rethink the seating arrangement. Even with Game Mode on a low-latency OLED TV, the system lags. In the kart racer, turning the wheel fast enough in 150cc mode was simply impossible.

The games themselves are mostly mediocre — graphically plain, lacking the polish of Nintendo or Apple Arcade, locked behind a subscription that offers no option to buy individual titles. Connect 4 Bounce defeated both parent and child before a single ball went in. The licensed properties — Bluey, Peppa Pig, TMNT — sound promising and mostly disappoint. The Bluey-loving kids weren't that into the Bluey game.

And yet. A sick five-year-old with a fever begged to play. A father-in-law who never wants in on anything wanted in. At dinner, the youngest erupted into cheers of 'Bowling!!! I love bowling!!!' The Flappy Bird clone — where players hop in the air to keep dragons fed — is somehow a household favorite despite every tracking failure. Mirrorama, which turns the TV into a magic mirror where kids shoot lightning from their hands and blur like Sonic, made them laugh harder than anything. Copy Cat, where AI judges who best struck a cartoon pose, held their attention without complaint.

The Nex Playground cannot be recommended on value. Too many games are repetitive, frustrating, or simply broken. But it demonstrates something worth sitting with: fun is not a product of technical precision. The device works — when it works — because it asks nothing of you except your body, because it gets children moving, because it makes watching your dad flail his arms look genuinely funny. Many classic arcade games are unfair, even broken. Sometimes you just want another turn.

A three-inch cube of a game console that costs $250 upfront, requires an $89-a-year subscription to unlock most of its library, and tracks your body worse than technology from nearly two decades ago has somehow managed to outsell Microsoft's Xbox for two weeks. The Nex Playground is not powerful. It is not pretty. Its motion-tracking camera can't perceive depth, which means it frequently mistakes two people for one, loses limbs mid-motion, and demands that you avoid repeating patterns on your clothing, long sleeves, and backlighting—demands that become almost comical when your kids want to play in their pajamas after their evening bath. By any reasonable measure of console gaming, it should not work.

And yet my five-year-old, lying sick in bed with a 99-degree fever, begged to play. When we started a game of virtual bowling, my father-in-law—who never wants in on anything—wanted in. My nine-year-old, after sending a low-rent airplane plummeting to its doom, immediately asked to try again. None of them cared that the games were bad. They cared that the games were dead simple to pick up without a controller, that they made them dance and jump and swing their arms, and that watching their dad do the same looked pretty funny.

The Nex Playground's tracking limitations are real and frequent. Unlike the Nintendo Wii, which used an infrared camera and accelerometer to detect arm movement, or Microsoft's Kinect, which painted your room with structured infrared light to estimate your full skeletal position in 3D space, the Playground has only a single wide-angle camera that estimates body pose from flat images. It can identify six joints—shoulders, elbows, hands—which is enough to throw a bowling ball down a lane or veer it left and right. But without depth perception, it gets confused easily. My nine-year-old couldn't sit on the couch while my five-year-old bowled several feet ahead because the system assumed all their limbs belonged to the same person. When the eldest raised a hand, she accidentally stole her sister's turn. My youngest cried for several minutes. Soon the eldest was crying too, when the Playground lost her hand mid-swing and sent her ball into the gutter. It happened again on her next turn, and she got angry.

The company knows its limitations and warns users accordingly: don't wear clothing with repeating patterns, don't wear long sleeves, play in a well-lit room but not backlit, avoid non-players in the camera view. These constraints help a single camera distinguish people from their background, but parents know some are harder than they sound. Kids' pajamas are covered in hearts, stars, smiley faces, repeating cats and unicorns. We had to roll up sleeves and rethink seating. "Avoid non-players in the camera view" meant clearing the entire living room of anyone who wasn't actively playing, having them stand far off to the side so the camera didn't snap to the wrong person mid-play. Sometimes we could sit on the couch with our hands hidden behind blankets or laptops. Even so, my kids frequently got too frustrated. My five-year-old, trying to send a cute puppy for a spa treatment in a Nintendogs-like game, complained: "I can't keep my hand steady! I just can't keep it steady!" The system also lags behind movements, even plugged directly into a low-latency OLED TV with Game Mode on. In the kart racer, I couldn't turn the steering wheel as fast as I wanted in 150cc mode.

The games themselves are mostly mediocre. Many are little better than shovelware, graphically ugly, lacking the charm or polish of Nintendo or the best of Apple Arcade. The subscription model means you can't buy individual games you like—you're locked into whatever the Playground's curated library offers. Some games are inexplicably frustrating: Connect 4 Bounce, where my kid and I gave up trying to get balls to even go in. Sports games are either laughably easy or have a steep learning curve because the camera can't detect depth, so it can't tell how you're hitting a ball. In tennis, you can't aim with your arm; it only controls the timing of your swing. You have to move your whole body to aim left or right. The licensed properties—Bluey, Peppa Pig, Gabby's Dollhouse, Sesame Street, How to Train Your Dragon, Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles—sound impressive on paper but often disappoint in practice. My Bluey-loving kids weren't that into the Bluey game. They got bored with Unicorn Academy when they realized they couldn't ride the unicorn anywhere interesting. The TMNT game is a frustrating endless runner where you constantly hop to clear obstacles.

And yet. My eldest wants to go visit her puppy in the pet care game. The other night at dinner, my youngest erupted into cheers of "Bowling!!! I love bowling!!!" when we said we might play again. Despite countless tracking failures, both kids say the Flappy Bird clone—where up to four people hop in the air to keep their dragons eating fruit instead of crashing into towers—is one of their favorites. Mirrorama, which turns the TV into a giant mirror with magical camera filters that let kids shoot lightning bolts from their hands, stretch their face, and blur like Sonic the Hedgehog, made them laugh the most. Copy Cat, where they just strike a zany cartoon pose and let AI judge who did it better, kept them engaged. Brick Buster, a Breakout clone where you only move left or right to move a forgivingly large paddle, is genuinely fun.

I can't say we'd get our money's worth from the Playground. Too many games are simple and repetitive, or frustrating from the start. But the device proves something worth knowing: fun isn't all about quality of execution. The Playground succeeds not because it's technically impressive—it isn't—but because it's accessible, because it gets kids moving, because it requires nothing but your body and a big screen. Many classic arcade games are unfair, even broken. But sometimes you just want another turn to beat the machine.

I can't keep my hand steady! I just can't keep it steady!
— Five-year-old player, attempting a pet care game
Bowling!!! I love bowling!!!
— Youngest child, at dinner, expressing enthusiasm to play again
A Conversa do Hearth Outra perspectiva sobre a história
Inventor

Why does a device with worse tracking than 20-year-old technology actually appeal to kids?

Model

Because it doesn't ask them to learn anything. No controller, no menu navigation, no tutorial. You stand in front of the camera and your body is the input. That's it.

Inventor

But the tracking fails constantly. Your kids got frustrated and cried.

Model

They did. But the frustration was at the game, not at the barrier to playing. They could always try again immediately. There's no loading screen, no complexity between them and the next attempt.

Inventor

The subscription model is expensive—$89 a year for a $250 device. How do you justify that?

Model

I don't, honestly. You can't. But that's a separate problem from whether the thing is fun. The fun part is free once you own it.

Inventor

What made Mirrorama work when so many other games didn't?

Model

It doesn't require precision. It just wants you to move and be silly. The camera's failures become part of the magic—your face stretches in weird ways, you blur like you're moving at light speed. The imperfection is the feature.

Inventor

Do you think your kids would have had as much fun with a higher-quality console?

Model

Probably not. A Nintendo Switch would give them better games, but they'd be sitting still holding a controller. The Playground made them dance. That's what they actually wanted.

Quer a matéria completa? Leia o original em The Verge ↗
Fale Conosco FAQ