FAO warns of global food crisis if Strait of Hormuz remains closed

Potential impact on billions of people's food security and thousands of maritime workers trapped in the Persian Gulf region.
The world faces a food crisis if the strait remains closed much longer
FAO economist Máximo Torero warns that prolonged blockade of the Strait of Hormuz threatens global food security and fertilizer supplies.

At the narrow passage between Iran and Oman, where a third of the world's seaborne oil has long flowed without interruption, a prolonged closure is forcing humanity to confront how fragile the architecture of global nourishment truly is. Máximo Torero of the Food and Agriculture Organization has warned that the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz threatens not merely energy markets but the fertilizer chains and grain shipments upon which billions of meals depend. What appears on maps as a sliver of water is, in practice, a keystone of the modern world's ability to feed itself — and its absence from commerce is already beginning to reveal the brittleness beneath decades of assumed stability.

  • The FAO's own economist is sounding an alarm grounded in real-time supply chain data: without fertilizer shipments through the strait, crop yields worldwide cannot hold, and hunger on a massive scale becomes a near-term possibility rather than a distant fear.
  • The crisis is not singular but simultaneous — energy prices spike, shipping insurance soars, and farmers face input costs they cannot absorb, compressing the system from multiple directions at once.
  • Thousands of maritime workers — sailors, port staff, logistics crews — are effectively trapped in the Persian Gulf, unable to move goods or themselves, turning a commercial corridor into a containment zone.
  • Eurozone economists are flagging recession risk as trade flows that have underpinned European prosperity for decades face severe constraint, with no viable alternative route capable of absorbing the volume of cargo normally transiting the waterway.
  • International pressure is mounting for urgent intervention to reopen the strait, with the understanding that the longer the blockade persists, the more the world's poorest populations — those who spend the greatest share of income on food — will bear the sharpest consequences.

Máximo Torero, an economist at the Food and Agriculture Organization, has issued one of the most consequential warnings of the current geopolitical crisis: a prolonged closure of the Strait of Hormuz risks triggering a global food catastrophe. The waterway, threading between Iran and Oman, carries roughly one-third of all seaborne oil, along with critical shipments of fertilizer and grain. It is not merely an energy corridor — it is a lifeline for the machinery of global food production.

The logic of the crisis is severe in its simplicity. Fertilizer supplies routed through the strait would dry up. Farmers unable to secure adequate inputs cannot sustain yields. Harvests shrink, prices climb, and the burden falls heaviest on the billions of people who already spend most of their income on food. One of the world's largest fertilizer producers has stated plainly that the conflict directly threatens billions of meals. Torero's warning carries institutional weight precisely because the FAO monitors these supply chains continuously — this is data speaking, not alarm for its own sake.

The damage radiates outward. Analysts have flagged recession risk for the eurozone as trade flows that have sustained European economies for decades face disruption with no credible alternative route. Thousands of maritime workers remain stranded in the region, unable to move cargo or themselves with any certainty. Shipping insurance costs have surged, adding pressure to supply chains already under strain.

What distinguishes this moment is the convergence of threats arriving together rather than in sequence. The world's energy and food systems were built on the quiet assumption that the strait would remain open. That assumption is now exposed. The international community faces a narrowing window to act — because the longer the blockade holds, the more the system's long-assumed resilience gives way to something far more fragile.

Máximo Torero, an economist at the Food and Agriculture Organization, has issued a stark warning: if the Strait of Hormuz remains closed much longer, the world faces a food crisis of unprecedented scale. The waterway, which sits between Iran and Oman, is one of the planet's most critical chokepoints—roughly one-third of all seaborne oil passes through it, along with essential shipments of fertilizer and grain. A prolonged blockade doesn't just disrupt energy markets. It threatens the basic machinery of global food production.

The mechanics of the crisis are straightforward but severe. Fertilizer supplies, which depend heavily on shipments through the strait, would dry up. Without adequate fertilizer, farmers across the world cannot sustain current crop yields. The result would ripple outward: reduced harvests, climbing food prices, and ultimately, hunger affecting billions of people. Torero's warning carries particular weight because the FAO tracks these supply chains in real time. When he says the closure poses an existential threat to food security, he is speaking from data, not speculation.

The economic fallout extends far beyond agriculture. Analysts at Investing.com have flagged the risk of recession in the eurozone if the blockade persists. Trade flows that have underpinned European prosperity for decades would be severed or severely constrained. The Persian Gulf, which should be a conduit for commerce, has become a trap. Thousands of maritime workers—sailors, port workers, logistics personnel—are effectively stranded in the region, unable to move goods or themselves with any certainty.

The crisis also exposes a deeper structural vulnerability. The world's energy and food systems have been built on the assumption that the Strait of Hormuz would remain open. No serious alternative exists. There is no backup route for the volume of cargo that normally transits the waterway. One of the world's largest fertilizer producers has warned that the conflict in Iran directly threatens billions of meals. The language is blunt because the stakes are blunt.

What makes this moment different from previous geopolitical shocks is the simultaneity of the threats. Energy prices spike. Fertilizer becomes scarce. Shipping insurance costs soar. Farmers cannot afford inputs. Food prices climb. The poor, who spend the largest share of their income on food, are hit first and hardest. The eurozone, already fragile, tips into recession. The system, which has always seemed resilient because it has always recovered, begins to show its true brittleness.

Torero's warning is not a prediction of doom so much as a description of what happens if current conditions persist. The Strait of Hormuz must reopen. The alternative—a world where billions of people face food insecurity, where entire economies contract, where maritime workers remain trapped in a war zone—is not acceptable and not sustainable. The question now is whether the international community can move fast enough to prevent it.

We are headed toward a food crisis if Hormuz does not reopen soon
— Máximo Torero, Food and Agriculture Organization
La Conversación del Hearth Otra perspectiva de la historia
Inventor

Why does one waterway matter so much? Couldn't ships just take a longer route?

Model

There is no longer route that works at scale. The Strait of Hormuz handles about a third of the world's seaborne oil and critical shipments of fertilizer. Rerouting around Africa or through other passages would take weeks longer and cost far more. For perishables and time-sensitive goods, it's not really an option.

Inventor

So this is about fertilizer specifically?

Model

Fertilizer is the clearest example, but it's the whole supply chain. Grain shipments, oil for fuel and chemicals, equipment for ports and farms. When one artery closes, everything downstream suffers. Farmers can't get inputs. Refineries can't get crude. Ports can't operate efficiently.

Inventor

The FAO economist used pretty strong language. Is he being alarmist?

Model

He's being precise. The FAO doesn't issue warnings lightly—they track global food supplies in real time. When Torero says we're headed toward a food crisis, he's reading the data. Fertilizer inventories are finite. If supplies don't resume soon, farmers will face impossible choices about what to plant and how much.

Inventor

What about the people actually stuck there—the maritime workers?

Model

They're in a genuinely precarious position. Thousands of sailors and port workers are essentially trapped in the Persian Gulf. They can't leave safely. They can't work normally. Their families don't know when they'll come home. It's not just an economic abstraction for them.

Inventor

Does this expose something about how fragile the global system really is?

Model

Completely. We've built everything on the assumption that certain routes stay open, that energy flows freely, that fertilizer is always available. One closure shows how thin that margin is. There's no redundancy, no backup. The system works until it doesn't.

Inventor

What happens if it stays closed for months?

Model

Food prices climb sharply. Poor countries and poor people are hit first. Malnutrition rises. Some regions face actual famine conditions. The eurozone tips into recession. It cascades. That's why Torero is sounding the alarm now—because the window to prevent it is closing.

Quieres la nota completa? Lee el original en Google News ↗
Contáctanos FAQ