Lumpy Skin Disease Kills 100,000 Cattle in India, Threatening Millions of Livelihoods

Millions of livestock deaths causing severe income losses and livelihood threats for small farmers, with inadequate government support and farmer uncertainty about disease management.
If these animals don't get treatment, they'll die.
A farmer in Uttar Pradesh with three sick cows, facing collapse with no government guidance on how to save them.

Across fifteen Indian states, a viral plague is moving through cattle herds with quiet devastation — killing nearly 100,000 animals, sickening two million more, and unraveling the fragile economic thread that holds millions of small farming families together. Lumpy skin disease, carried by insects and without a cure, has arrived at the end of a year already marked by heat waves, failed rains, and ruined harvests. For a nation that leads the world in milk production and whose dairy sector sustains 80 million livelihoods, this is not merely an agricultural emergency — it is a test of how a society cares for its most vulnerable when catastrophe compounds catastrophe.

  • Deaths among cattle have nearly doubled in three weeks, with 100,000 already lost and over 2 million animals infected across 15 states — and the disease is still moving eastward.
  • Small farmers who relied on dairy income as a lifeline against bad harvests now face a total economic collapse, with sick animals producing no milk, losing weight, and becoming unable to conceive.
  • A year of cascading disasters — record heat waves, failed winter rains, and flood-damaged rice fields — had already pushed farmers to the edge before the first lumpy skin lesions appeared.
  • Authorities are vaccinating cattle with a substitute vaccine designed for a related disease, a stopgap measure that leaves farmers uncertain and scientists warning that the virus has already mutated significantly from earlier strains.
  • In villages across Rajasthan and Uttar Pradesh, farmers watch helplessly as animals die in mass graves or rot in open fields, with little government guidance, no treatment protocol, and no financial relief in sight.

In villages across India, cattle are dying by the thousands. Lumpy skin disease — a viral illness spread by mosquitoes and ticks — has killed nearly 100,000 cows and buffaloes this year and sickened more than 2 million others. Animals develop high fevers and skin lesions, stop producing milk, grow skeletal and weak. There is no cure, and the vaccine being used was designed for a different disease entirely.

The outbreak could not have come at a worse time. India's farmers had already endured a record April heat wave that destroyed wheat crops, failed winter rains in eastern states, and unusually heavy September rainfall that damaged rice fields in the north. Cattle had long served as a financial buffer against such shocks — a cow's milk income could absorb a bad harvest. Lumpy skin disease eliminates that buffer entirely. Agriculture policy expert Devinder Sharma calls it a serious crisis, and suspects the official death toll is an undercount.

Western Rajasthan has suffered most, recording 60,000 deaths and nearly 1.4 million sick animals. Mass graves now mark the landscape. The disease is spreading eastward, and in Uttar Pradesh, movement restrictions on cattle have left farmers like Amarnath Sharma — who has watched three of his five cows fall ill — confused and without guidance. No treatment protocol, no financial support, no clear answers.

The stakes extend far beyond individual farms. India's dairy sector employs 80 million people and accounts for more than one-fifth of global milk production. Yet the national response has been improvised. Geneticist Vinod Scaria, who has studied the virus's current strain, found it has mutated significantly from earlier versions — a warning sign that continuous livestock disease surveillance, long neglected, could have prepared the country for exactly this moment. Instead, the country reacts farm by farm, as livelihoods quietly disappear.

In villages across India, cattle are dying by the thousands. A viral disease called lumpy skin disease has killed nearly 100,000 cows and buffaloes this year alone and sickened more than 2 million others. The animals develop high fevers and lumps across their skin. Mosquitoes and ticks spread the virus from one animal to the next, and there is no cure—only the hope of a vaccine that does not yet exist.

The outbreak has arrived at the worst possible moment for India's farmers. The country has already been battered by catastrophe. A record heat wave in April devastated wheat crops. Winter rains failed to come to eastern states like Jharkhand, withering pulses and other staple crops. Then in September, unusually heavy rainfall damaged rice fields in the north. Now, as farmers were beginning to assess those losses, the livestock began to die. The disease has spread to at least 15 states, and the death toll nearly doubled in just three weeks.

For small farmers, cattle have long been a buffer against agricultural collapse. A cow or buffalo provides milk to sell, a steady income stream that can absorb the shocks of bad harvests and unpredictable weather. Lumpy skin disease destroys that buffer. Infected animals stop producing milk. They become skeletal and weak. Many cannot conceive. The economic blow is total. Devinder Sharma, an agriculture policy expert based in Chandigarh, calls it a serious crisis compounded by what he suspects is government undercount of the actual death toll. The disease has been building for two years, he notes, and the timing could not be worse for farmers already stretched thin.

Western Rajasthan has been hit hardest. The state has recorded 60,000 cattle deaths and nearly 1.4 million animals sickened. In villages across the region, mass graves now dot the landscape. In some places, carcasses rot in the open air. The cries of sick animals echo through the countryside. Narendra Mohan Singh, a director at Rajasthan's Animal Husbandry Department, warns that the disease is contagious and spreading eastward, from the western states toward the population centers of the east.

In Uttar Pradesh, India's most populous state, authorities have tried to contain the spread by restricting the movement of cattle across state lines. But the restrictions have left many farmers confused and isolated. Amarnath Sharma, a farmer in Milkipur village, has five cows. Three are now sick. He has heard about the viral disease but does not know what to do. "If these animals don't get treatment, they'll die," he said. The government has offered no clear guidance, no treatment protocol, no financial support. Farmers in affected states like Himachal Pradesh have begun pleading with authorities for aid.

Dairy is not a marginal sector in India. It employs 80 million people and contributes 5 percent of the nation's economy. India is the world's largest milk producer, accounting for more than one-fifth of global production. The industry is vast and vital. Yet the response to this epidemic has been improvised. Authorities are vaccinating healthy cattle with a vaccine designed for a different, related disease—a stopgap measure while researchers work to develop a more effective vaccine. A scientist named Vinod Scaria at the Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology in New Delhi has studied the genetic makeup of the virus circulating now. He found it is significantly different from previous versions. Viruses mutate constantly, and not all mutations are harmful. But this one raises questions. How did the virus change so much in two years? What does that mean for future outbreaks? Scaria argues that continuous surveillance of livestock diseases would have prepared the country for this moment. Instead, the country is reacting, village by village, farm by farm, as animals die and farmers watch their livelihoods disappear.

It's a serious, serious issue and this disease has been growing since the last couple of years. The government figures were likely an undercount of the actual death toll.
— Devinder Sharma, agriculture policy expert
If you had continuous surveillance, you would be prepared.
— Vinod Scaria, scientist at Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology
La Conversación del Hearth Otra perspectiva de la historia
Inventor

Why does this disease hit small farmers so much harder than large operations?

Model

Because small farmers don't have reserves. A big dairy operation can absorb the loss of some animals. A small farmer with five cows loses a third of their income if three get sick. That's not a setback—that's a collapse.

Inventor

But India produces more milk than anywhere else on Earth. Shouldn't there be infrastructure to handle this?

Model

There is infrastructure for production, not for crisis. The system works when things are normal. When a heat wave hits, when rains fail, when a new virus appears—the system has no shock absorbers for the people at the bottom.

Inventor

The article mentions the virus is genetically different from past versions. Does that mean it's getting worse?

Model

It means we don't know. That's the real problem. The scientist says if there had been continuous monitoring, they would have seen the changes happening and been ready. Instead, they're vaccinating with the wrong vaccine and hoping.

Inventor

What happens to a farmer like Amarnath Sharma if his three sick cows die?

Model

He loses his milk income. His family's food security becomes precarious. He might have to sell land or borrow money at rates he can't repay. The cascade is quick and brutal.

Inventor

Is there any sign the government understands the scale of this?

Model

The expert quoted in the story thinks the official death count is too low. That suggests either the government doesn't know how bad it is, or it's downplaying it. Either way, the farmers know. They're living it.

Contáctanos FAQ