Nearly nine out of ten cases prevented by a single injection
Vaccinated 80-year-olds show 88% fewer shingles cases (202 vs 1,705 per 100k) compared to unvaccinated peers, with lower but still significant 54% protection at age 65. Shingles affects 1 in 50 people over 80 annually in Spain, causing chronic pain in 15% of cases; over 75,000 Spaniards suffer yearly with incidence rising due to aging population.
- Vaccinated 80-year-olds: 202 cases per 100,000; unvaccinated: 1,705 per 100,000 (88% reduction)
- Shingles affects roughly 1 in 50 people over 80 annually; causes chronic pain in up to 15% of cases
- Over 75,000 Spaniards diagnosed with shingles yearly; incidence rising for 20+ years due to aging population
- Murcia prevented 72 cases at age 65 in 2024 despite <40% vaccination coverage; full coverage would prevent 198 cases
- Vaccine publicly funded in Spain since late 2022; costs 120 euros per dose, two doses required
Spain's new shingles vaccine demonstrates nearly 90% effectiveness in preventing disease among those over 80, with real-world data from Murcia showing dramatic case reductions since public funding began in 2022.
In the spring of 2024, epidemiologists in Spain's Murcia region began comparing two populations: people over eighty who had received the new shingles vaccine, and those who had not. What they found was striking. Among the vaccinated, shingles cases dropped to 202 per 100,000 people. Among the unvaccinated, the number climbed to 1,705 per 100,000. That was an 88 percent reduction—nearly nine out of ten cases prevented by a single injection.
These are the first real-world numbers Spain has collected since the government began publicly funding the Shingrix vaccine in late 2022. The data comes from a region of 1.61 million people, and it offers the clearest picture yet of what the vaccine can actually do. For people turning sixty-five, the protection was somewhat less dramatic but still substantial: a fifty-four percent reduction in cases. The difference between the two age groups surprised the researchers themselves, and they are still working to understand why the vaccine performs so much better in the very old.
Shingles is not a minor affliction. The disease, known colloquially in Spanish as "culebrilla" for the ribbon-like rash it produces, causes intense pain that can linger for months or even years. In up to fifteen percent of patients, the pain becomes chronic, a condition called postherpetic neuralgia that can devastate quality of life. Across Spain, more than seventy-five thousand people develop shingles each year, and the number has been climbing steadily for more than two decades as the population ages. Among people over eighty, the disease strikes roughly one in fifty annually.
The virus behind shingles is the same one that causes chickenpox. In people who had chickenpox as children—which is nearly everyone—the virus remains dormant in nerve tissue for decades. As the immune system weakens with age, or sometimes due to other illnesses or medications, the virus can reactivate. There is no cure, only management of the symptoms.
Getting the vaccine to this point required patience and money. Shingrix, made by the pharmaceutical company GSK, costs 120 euros per dose, and two doses are needed for full protection. When the vaccine first became available, global supplies were tight. The Spanish government and regional health authorities eventually agreed to concentrate vaccination efforts on two groups: people turning sixty-five and people turning eighty each year. This targeted approach made the economics work for public health systems stretched thin across the country.
Murcia's epidemiologists arrived at their findings by linking vaccination records with disease surveillance data. The work was technically straightforward but valuable: they could see, in concrete numbers, what happened when people got vaccinated and what happened when they did not. In 2024, among sixty-five-year-olds, vaccinated people had 487 cases per 100,000, compared to 1,068 among the unvaccinated. The researchers acknowledge these are raw figures that may contain some bias and confounding factors, but preliminary 2025 data suggests the pattern holds.
The implications are substantial. In Murcia alone, vaccination prevented seventy-two cases among sixty-five-year-olds in 2024, despite vaccination coverage sitting below forty percent. If every eligible person had been vaccinated, the number would have risen to 198 prevented cases in a single year. At age eighty, the figures were thirty-seven and 120 respectively. As new cohorts reach these ages year after year, the cumulative benefit compounds. Jaime Pérez Martín, who heads the regional health authority's prevention service and leads Spain's vaccination association, calls it an enormous accumulated health benefit. He also notes that regional governments made significant financial commitments to this program, and now they are beginning to see the payoff.
Nationally, the picture is still incomplete. Coverage remains around forty percent in most regions, and the vaccine has only recently entered the public system. The incidence of shingles was already rising before vaccination began, so detecting a national decline will take time. Researchers at Spain's Carlos III Health Institute say the Murcia data is encouraging but that more time and larger studies are needed to see the full picture. GSK, in a written statement, noted that other countries administering the vaccine have seen effectiveness rates between seventy-five and eighty-five percent in real-world conditions, somewhat lower than the ninety-plus percent achieved in controlled clinical trials but consistent with what happens when any vaccine moves from the laboratory to the population at large.
Citas Notables
These are important health benefits that vaccination against a major public health problem is already delivering. It's good news because the regional governments made a significant financial effort and now we're beginning to see the results.— Jaime Pérez Martín, head of Murcia's health prevention service and president of Spain's vaccination association
It's very striking and we'll need to investigate it in depth. In any case, the benefits are clear and show the unnecessary risk that people take when they don't get vaccinated despite being in age groups where the vaccine is included in the publicly funded vaccination schedule.— Jaime Pérez Martín, on the difference in vaccine effectiveness between age 65 and age 80
La Conversación del Hearth Otra perspectiva de la historia
Why does the vaccine work so much better at eighty than at sixty-five? That's counterintuitive.
That's what surprised the researchers too. You'd think an older immune system would respond less well to vaccination, not more. They're still investigating, but one possibility is that by eighty, the people who are most vulnerable to severe shingles have already had it, so the remaining population is somewhat selected. Or there could be something about the immune response at that age we don't yet understand.
The coverage is still below forty percent. Why aren't more people getting vaccinated if it works this well?
It's a combination of things. The vaccine is relatively new to the public system. People don't always know it exists or that it's free. There's also the practical matter of getting two doses scheduled. And some people simply don't see shingles as a serious threat until they get it.
The chronic pain aspect—postherpetic neuralgia—that sounds genuinely disabling.
It is. Imagine a burning, stabbing pain that doesn't go away for months or years. It can make it hard to sleep, to move, to engage with life. For elderly people already dealing with other health issues, it's a real burden. Preventing it entirely is worth a lot.
So if coverage reached eighty or ninety percent, the number of prevented cases would be even higher?
Substantially. In Murcia, they estimate that full vaccination at age sixty-five would prevent 198 cases a year instead of seventy-two. And that's just one region. Multiply that across Spain, and you're talking about thousands of cases prevented annually.
What's the catch? Why isn't everyone vaccinated?
Cost is part of it historically, though it's publicly funded now. But also, the vaccine hasn't been around long enough for people to see the results. This Murcia data is the first real proof that it works in actual populations. That might change behavior.