Italian glacier collapse kills 8, leaves 15 missing with little hope of survival

At least 8 confirmed dead, 8 injured, and 15 missing presumed dead after a glacier collapse buried hikers on the Marmolada mountain.
The avalanche would have crushed them. Too many hours had passed.
A rescue official explaining why hopes of finding survivors were essentially nonexistent.

A 200-meter-long ice avalanche traveling at 300 km/h struck the Marmolada glacier on Sunday, burying hikers across a 2-square-kilometer debris field. Prosecutors fear final death toll could double or triple given 15 missing persons and 16 parked cars still unaccounted for in the disaster zone.

  • A 200-meter-long ice wave traveling 300 km/h struck on Sunday at 1:45 p.m.
  • Eight confirmed dead, eight injured, 15 missing; 16 cars unaccounted for
  • Summit temperature reached 12°C; glacier expected to vanish in 25-30 years

A massive glacier collapse in Italy's Marmolada killed at least eight people and left 15 missing, with rescue teams expressing little hope of finding survivors. The disaster, attributed to record temperatures reaching 12°C at the summit, highlights climate change's impact on Alpine glaciers.

On Sunday afternoon at 1:45 p.m., as the sun moved fully across the face of the Marmolada glacier, the mountain broke. A serac—a fracture in the ice—gave way between Punta Rocca and Punta Penia, unleashing a wave of ice, rock, and snow 200 meters long and 30 meters high. It descended at 300 kilometers per hour, burying hikers across a debris field that would eventually cover two square kilometers. When the dust settled, eight people were confirmed dead, eight more injured, and fifteen were missing. Rescue teams, working through the wreckage, held little hope of finding anyone alive.

The collapse was not random. For days, temperatures in the region had climbed to unprecedented levels. On the morning of the disaster, the thermometer at the glacier's summit—3,343 meters above sea level—reached 12 degrees Celsius. At 4,400 meters, the freezing point had risen to zero only at that altitude. These were not normal conditions for the Alps. The heat had weakened the ice, destabilized the structure, and made catastrophe inevitable. Some hikers were ascending the mountain when it happened. Others were descending. A few were in the parking area below. None of them saw it coming.

By Monday morning, when Italian Prime Minister Mario Draghi attempted to reach the site by helicopter, the weather had turned foul enough to ground his aircraft. The rescue operation was already struggling. Teams deployed drones equipped with thermal cameras, machines capable of detecting the heat signature of a living person even in darkness. But the work was hampered by conditions and by a grim calculus: if temperatures did not drop significantly, more sections of the glacier could collapse. Authorities warned people away from the zone entirely.

The prosecutor leading the investigation, Sandro Raimondi, spoke with the bluntness of someone confronting a disaster that was still unfolding. He feared the final death toll could be double or triple the current count. Sixteen cars remained parked in the area, their owners unaccounted for. Some of the missing were believed to be foreign nationals whose families might not yet know they had been on the mountain. The identification of the dead would require DNA analysis. Giorgio Gajer, president of the Alpine Rescue Service in Alto Adige and an expert in mountain operations, was equally stark: the chances of finding survivors were, he said, not just low but essentially nonexistent. The avalanche would have crushed them. Too many hours had passed.

Draghi, standing before reporters, called it a tragedy partly unpredictable but rooted in something larger. "It depends on environmental deterioration and the climate situation," he said. The government, he added, needed to reflect on what had happened and act to prevent it from occurring again. His words acknowledged a harder truth that scientists had been documenting for years. The Marmolada, the highest glacier in the Dolomites, was dying. Between 2004 and 2015, it had lost 30 percent of its volume and 22 percent of its surface area. At the current rate of decline, it would vanish entirely within 25 to 30 years—possibly sooner if warming continued. Roberto Colucci, a researcher with Italy's National Research Council, laid out the larger picture: by 2100, even in the most optimistic scenario, 70 percent of Alpine glaciers would be gone. In the worst case, 96 percent.

The Marmolada collapse was, by the measure of Alpine disasters, unprecedented in scale. It was also, in a sense, a preview. The mountain had spoken. The question now was whether anyone was listening.

It depends on environmental deterioration and the climate situation. The government must reflect on what happened and take measures to prevent it from occurring again.
— Prime Minister Mario Draghi
The chances of finding survivors are not just low but essentially nonexistent. The avalanche would have crushed them.
— Giorgio Gajer, Alpine Rescue Service president
A Conversa do Hearth Outra perspectiva sobre a história
Inventor

Why did the glacier fail at that exact moment—1:45 on Sunday?

Model

The heat had been building for days. Temperatures at the summit reached 12 degrees. That's warm enough to weaken the internal structure of ice that's been frozen for centuries. When the sun hit that face of the mountain directly, it was the final push.

Inventor

Sixteen cars in the parking lot. That suggests people didn't know the danger.

Model

Exactly. This wasn't a closed trail. People were hiking it as they normally would. The glacier had been stable in living memory. No one expected it to fail like that, not with such violence.

Inventor

The prosecutor said the death toll could triple. How is that possible?

Model

Because they don't know who was on the mountain. Some hikers may have been foreign tourists. Their families don't know yet that they were there. And the debris field is two square kilometers. Bodies are still buried under ice and rock.

Inventor

What does it mean that the glacier will be gone in 25 years?

Model

It means this wasn't a freak event. It was a symptom. The mountain is warming faster than anywhere else on Earth. The ice can't survive it. And if Marmolada goes, so will most of the others.

Inventor

Did anyone see it coming?

Model

Scientists did. They've been publishing papers about glacier loss for years. But a glacier collapse at that scale, at that speed? That's the kind of thing you read about in reports. You don't expect to be standing at the base of it.

Quer a matéria completa? Leia o original em El País ↗
Fale Conosco FAQ