U.S.-Iran Peace Deal Text Finalized as Both Sides Near Historic Agreement

At least 3,711 killed in Lebanon including 132 medical workers and 247 children; over 1 million displaced from Israeli security zones; three Indian mariners killed in U.S. strikes on tankers.
Peace has never been this close as it is now
Pakistan's prime minister on the finalized text of a U.S.-Iran peace deal framework, though significant gaps remain between what each side claims was agreed.

After more than a hundred days of war that has displaced millions and rattled global energy markets, the United States and Iran stand at the edge of a negotiated peace — a moment that carries the weight of decades of enmity and the fragile hope of a region exhausted by conflict. Pakistan's prime minister confirmed Friday that negotiators have agreed upon a final text, while Iran's foreign minister described the framework as closer to completion than ever before. The proposed agreement would pause the fighting, reopen the Strait of Hormuz, and open a window for nuclear talks — yet the distance between what each side says was agreed upon may still be wide enough to swallow the deal whole.

  • A 105-day war has killed thousands, displaced over a million people, and choked a fifth of the world's oil supply — and a signed agreement is now said to be days away.
  • Pakistan's prime minister and Iran's foreign minister both signal the deal text is finalized, but Trump publicly contradicted Iranian media's version of the terms, and Tehran warned that American contradictions have repeatedly destabilized the process.
  • The framework on the table — a 60-day ceasefire, Strait of Hormuz reopening, $24 billion in unfrozen assets, and nuclear negotiations — sent oil prices falling 4% and lifted Wall Street futures, markets betting peace is real.
  • Israel, excluded from the talks, insists it will not leave its security zones in Lebanon or Gaza, Hezbollah and Israeli forces are still exchanging fire, and Iran has demanded those conflicts end as a condition of any deal.
  • U.S. military planners are quietly preparing contingencies to secure Iran's nuclear materials if an agreement holds, while the Pentagon and Department of Energy review scenarios for deploying specialized teams across the region.

After more than 105 days of strikes, blockades, and mounting casualties, the United States and Iran appear to be approaching a historic agreement. Pakistan's prime minister announced Friday that negotiators had finalized the text of a memorandum of understanding, and Iran's foreign minister said the deal framework had "never been closer" to completion, with a digital signing expected within days.

The emerging agreement follows a deliberate sequence: an immediate 60-day ceasefire extension, the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz — through which roughly a fifth of the world's crude oil normally flows — and intensive negotiations over Iran's nuclear program. Iran would commit in principle to halting uranium enrichment for 15 to 20 years and dismantling its enrichment infrastructure. In return, the U.S. would release approximately $24 billion in frozen Iranian assets. A senior Trump administration official put confidence in a signing at "80 to 85 percent."

The path to signature remains unstable. Trump directly contradicted Iranian state media's characterization of the deal's terms, while Iran's foreign ministry warned that "contradictory positions of the United States have always caused this process to become unstable." Iranian state outlets published draft terms — including provisions that Iran retain control of the Strait and receive compensation for damages from U.S. and Israeli strikes — that diverge sharply from what American officials describe.

The war's human cost has been severe. Israeli strikes on Lebanon have killed at least 3,711 people, including 132 medical workers and 247 children. More than one million residents have been forced from Israeli-declared security zones extending 25 miles into Lebanese territory, with Human Rights Watch warning the displacement may constitute war crimes. A Vatican aid convoy was stopped by Israeli tanks and arrived 12 hours late. India has twice summoned the U.S. diplomat in New Delhi to protest American strikes on tankers that killed Indian mariners.

Oil markets responded to the peace optimism with Brent crude falling roughly 4 percent to near $87 per barrel, still well above pre-war levels. Wall Street futures rose on expectations that reopening the strait would ease global energy costs.

Israel, not a party to the talks, has made clear it expects Trump to ensure Iran never obtains nuclear weapons, and Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz said Israel would not withdraw from its security zones. Iran has consistently demanded any deal include an end to fighting in Lebanon and Gaza — a condition that remains unresolved as Hezbollah and Israeli forces continue exchanging fire.

Behind the scenes, American military planners have begun reviewing contingencies for securing Iran's nuclear materials if a deal is reached, with the Pentagon and Department of Energy considering scenarios for deploying specialized teams to locate and remove enriched uranium stockpiles. The next several days will reveal whether the framework can survive the gap between what each side believes it has agreed to.

After months of escalating strikes and blockades that have fractured global energy markets and displaced over a million people across the Middle East, the United States and Iran appear to be on the threshold of a historic agreement. Pakistan's prime minister announced Friday that negotiators have finalized the text of a memorandum of understanding between the two countries, and Iran's foreign minister said the deal framework has "never been closer" to completion. The agreement, if signed, would end a war that has now stretched past its 105th day and reshaped the region's geopolitical landscape.

The emerging deal hinges on a straightforward sequence: first, an immediate ceasefire extension lasting 60 days; second, the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, the vital shipping corridor through which roughly a fifth of the world's crude oil normally flows; and third, a period of intensive negotiations over Iran's nuclear program. According to sources familiar with the talks, Iran would commit in principle to halting uranium enrichment for 15 to 20 years while dismantling its enrichment infrastructure. In exchange, the U.S. would release approximately $24 billion in frozen Iranian assets, with half becoming available before the 60-day negotiation window closes. A senior Trump administration official told reporters Friday that confidence in a signing within days had risen to "80 to 85 percent," though they cautioned the deal remained contingent on final approvals from both governments.

Yet the path to signature remains treacherous. President Trump on Friday directly contradicted Iranian state media's characterization of the agreement's terms, posting on Truth Social that their description had "nothing to do" with what was actually agreed to in writing. The Iranian foreign ministry, meanwhile, stressed that no final decision had been made, with spokesman Esmail Baqaei telling state television that "contradictory positions of the United States have always caused this process to become unstable." Iran's state news outlets have published what they claim are draft terms—including provisions that Iran retain control of the Strait of Hormuz and receive compensation for damage from U.S. and Israeli strikes—but these accounts appear to diverge sharply from what American officials say has been negotiated. The digital signing is now planned to occur within days, with details to be released publicly afterward, according to Iran's foreign minister Abbas Araghchi.

The war's human toll has been staggering. Israeli strikes on Lebanon have killed at least 3,711 people, including 132 medical workers and 247 children, according to the Lebanese Ministry of Health. Israel has established what it calls security zones extending roughly 25 miles north of the Lebanese border, forcing more than one million residents to evacuate. Human Rights Watch has said these "deliberate acts of displacement may amount to war crimes." A Vatican aid convoy attempting to deliver supplies to Christian villages in southern Lebanon was stopped by Israeli tanks on Thursday and forced to take a longer route, arriving 12 hours late. Meanwhile, U.S. Central Command reported intercepting multiple Iranian attack drones targeting commercial ships in the Strait of Hormuz on Friday, and India has twice summoned the U.S. diplomat in New Delhi to protest American strikes on oil tankers that have killed Indian mariners.

The blockade of Iranian ports has redirected 139 commercial vessels and disabled nine non-compliant ships since mid-April. Oil prices have fallen sharply on optimism about a deal—Brent crude dropped roughly 4 percent Friday to trade near $87 per barrel, still far above the $70 level before the war began in late February. Wall Street futures rose on the news, with investors betting that reopening the Strait of Hormuz would ease global energy costs and inflation pressures that have rippled worldwide.

Israel, which is not a party to the negotiations, has made clear it expects Trump to ensure Iran never obtains nuclear weapons. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Friday he and Trump are in "complete agreement" on this point, and Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz said Israel would not withdraw from its security zones in Lebanon, Syria, and Gaza. The Trump administration has publicly sought to curb Israeli operations in Lebanon, but Hezbollah and Israeli forces have continued trading fire, with the IDF reporting it killed 80 Hezbollah fighters in the past week alone. Iran has consistently demanded that any U.S. deal must include an end to fighting in Lebanon and Gaza—a condition that remains unresolved.

Behind the scenes, American military planners have begun discussing contingencies for securing Iran's nuclear materials if a deal is reached. According to U.S. officials, the Pentagon and Department of Energy have reviewed scenarios in which specialized teams would be deployed across the Middle East to locate, secure, and remove Iran's stockpiles of highly enriched uranium. These discussions remain preliminary and depend on how battlefield and political conditions evolve. Vice President JD Vance sought to dispel what he called "fake information" about the deal, insisting Iran is "not receiving any cash" simply for signing and that economic benefits will only flow if Tehran meets its obligations. The next week will determine whether the framework announced Friday can survive the gap between what each side claims has been agreed to.

Peace has never been this close as it is now
— Pakistan's Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif
A deal has never been closer, and all details will be shared with the public in due course
— Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi
We're 80 to 85 percent confident of signing in the coming days, but it's not 100 percent
— Senior Trump administration official
A Conversa do Hearth Outra perspectiva sobre a história
Inventor

Why does it matter that Pakistan's prime minister made this announcement rather than, say, the U.S. or Iran directly?

Model

Pakistan has been the crucial mediator throughout this war. They have relationships with both sides that neither the U.S. nor Iran fully trusts the other to maintain. When Islamabad says a text is final, it carries weight because they've been in the room for all the hard conversations.

Inventor

The source material mentions Trump contradicting Iranian media about the terms. What's actually being disputed?

Model

The core disagreement is over what Iran gets and what it gives up. Iranian outlets are saying Iran keeps control of the Strait of Hormuz and gets compensation for war damage. Trump is saying that's not what was negotiated. The real terms appear to involve Iran accepting international oversight of the strait and nuclear inspections in exchange for sanctions relief.

Inventor

Why would Iran's own state media publish terms that Trump says aren't real?

Model

Iran's media landscape is fractured. Different outlets are affiliated with different military and government factions. Some hardliners want to kill the deal entirely, so they publish maximalist versions of what they hope to get. It's a way of signaling to their base that they didn't surrender, even if the actual agreement is more modest.

Inventor

The piece mentions U.S. military planning to secure Iran's nuclear materials. Does that suggest the U.S. doesn't trust Iran to comply?

Model

It's standard contingency planning. But yes, it reflects deep skepticism. The U.S. is essentially preparing for the possibility that Iran will cheat or that the deal will collapse, and they want to be ready to move fast if that happens.

Inventor

What's the connection between the Lebanon fighting and the Iran deal?

Model

Iran has made it clear: no deal unless the fighting in Lebanon stops. But Israel says it won't leave Lebanon, and Hezbollah keeps firing. So you have a deal framework that depends on resolving a conflict neither side is willing to actually end. That's the real fragility here.

Inventor

Why are oil prices falling if the deal isn't signed yet?

Model

Markets are pricing in the probability. If there's an 80 percent chance the Strait of Hormuz reopens, traders are already adjusting. They don't wait for the signature. But that also means if the deal collapses, oil could spike again just as fast.

Quer a matéria completa? Leia o original em CBS News ↗
Fale Conosco FAQ