Adecco's Barricat: HR Must Shift From Support Function to Strategic Competitive Lever

Adecco Iberia created 144,000 jobs in Spain, supported 50,000 youth in first employment, facilitated professional transitions for 25,000 senior workers, and provided opportunities to 5,400 people at social exclusion risk.
Wellbeing isn't an offering. It's how you design the organization.
Barricat argues that genuine employee wellbeing requires structural change, not supplementary programs.

HR departments must shift from process-focused roles to strategic drivers of competitiveness, addressing workforce aging, talent gaps, and AI disruption. Genuine employee wellbeing requires structural organizational changes—clarity, accountability, and real development—not just supplementary benefit programs.

  • Adecco Iberia created 144,000 jobs in Spain last year
  • 50,000 young people supported in first employment
  • 25,000 senior workers facilitated through professional transitions
  • 5,400 people at social exclusion risk provided employment opportunities
  • HR function shifted from process-focused support to strategic competitive driver

Adecco Iberia's president discusses how HR has evolved from support function to strategic competitive lever, emphasizing sustainable performance, authentic leadership, and inclusive talent management in uncertain times.

Iker Barricat, president of Adecco Iberia, sits down to talk about what he sees happening in human resources—and it amounts to a fundamental reckoning about what the function is actually for.

The world has shifted, he says. For years, HR departments optimized themselves around stability: processes, efficiency, the machinery of hiring and payroll. That work still matters. But the ground beneath it has moved. Constant change and uncertainty are now the baseline. Aging workforces, persistent talent shortages across sectors, the arrival of artificial intelligence remaking what skills matter and how work gets done—these are not temporary disruptions. They are the new operating environment. And in that environment, HR has stopped being a support function and become something else entirely: a direct lever on whether a company can compete and produce.

This shift has forced a reckoning about what wellbeing actually means. Barricat observes that companies have deployed wellbeing initiatives with real energy in recent years—programs, benefits, specific actions. That's progress. But much of it misses the point. When wellbeing becomes a separate layer, something bolted onto the side of how the organization actually runs, it becomes compensation for what's broken rather than a fix for the break itself. The real foundations of wellbeing, he argues, are simpler and harder: clarity about what matters, reasonable workloads, quality leadership, and consistency in how decisions get made. The uncomfortable question organizations should ask themselves is whether they're building sustainable high-performance environments or just papering over dysfunction with new initiatives. Stress, the inability to disconnect from work, emotional distance from the mission—these aren't soft issues. They drive absenteeism and kill productivity.

Leadership has to change too. Closeness, empathy, inspiration—those remain valuable. But teams now need something more specific. They need clarity about what's actually prioritized in a complex environment, because ambiguity creates friction. They need accountability paired with autonomy, not autonomy masquerading as the absence of standards. And they need real development, not formal training programs but the daily work of a leader creating conditions for others to grow. Barricat notes that organizations now contain multiple generations with different expectations. They don't just want direction anymore. They want accompaniment. They want leaders who listen, who provide context, who build trust. In an environment of constant change, trust is what allows people to make decisions and contribute.

When asked what message he'd send to the HR profession on its international day, Barricat points to numbers. Last year, Adecco Iberia created more than 144,000 jobs in Spain. The company supported over 50,000 young people in their first employment, facilitated professional transitions for more than 25,000 senior workers, and through its foundation provided employment opportunities to 5,400 people at risk of social exclusion. These aren't marketing figures to him. They're evidence of what the sector can actually do: create pathways to real professional development, autonomy, and stability for people who might otherwise have none.

The challenge ahead is making sure nobody gets left behind in this transformation. That means serious investment in retraining and reskilling, and it means building talent management systems that are genuinely inclusive and based on what people can actually do, not on credentials or categories. The future of work, Barricat suggests, depends on whether HR can help organizations navigate that transition with intention—not just react to it.

The uncomfortable question organizations should ask is whether they're building sustainable high-performance environments or just compensating with initiatives for what doesn't work in daily operations.
— Iker Barricat, Adecco Iberia president
In environments of constant change, trust is what allows people to make decisions and contribute value.
— Iker Barricat
La Conversación del Hearth Otra perspectiva de la historia
Inventor

You say HR has become a competitive lever. But doesn't that risk turning people into just another resource to optimize?

Model

That's the exact tension we're living in. The point isn't to optimize people harder. It's that in uncertain times, how you develop, trust, and retain talent directly determines whether you survive. It's not more ruthless—it's more strategic about what actually matters.

Inventor

You mention that wellbeing initiatives often fail because they're parallel to the real work. Can you give a concrete example of what structural change looks like?

Model

If your teams are drowning in unclear priorities and conflicting demands, no wellness program fixes that. You have to actually redesign how decisions get made, what gets measured, what gets cut. That's structural. It's harder than launching a meditation app.

Inventor

On leadership—you say teams want accompaniment, not just direction. How does that work at scale in a large organization?

Model

It starts with clarity from the top about what the organization is actually trying to do. Then leaders at every level have to create space for people to think, fail, learn. It's not about being friends. It's about being consistent and trustworthy.

Inventor

The numbers you cite—144,000 jobs created—those are impressive. But how do you measure whether those jobs actually changed people's lives?

Model

We track it. We see people move from unemployment into stability. We see young people get their first real opportunity. We see senior workers find new chapters. That's not just employment data. That's lives.

Inventor

What worries you most about the future of work?

Model

That we'll automate and optimize without asking whether we're building something sustainable. That we'll leave people behind because they don't fit the new skill sets. That's why inclusive, skills-based models matter so much.

Quieres la nota completa? Lee el original en RRHH Digital ↗
Contáctanos FAQ