Venezuelan Government and Opposition Hold First Talks in Paris on Dialogue

Venezuela's path is dialogue, the suspension of all illegal sanctions
Government representative Jorge Rodríguez stated the Venezuelan government's core position at the Paris Peace Forum.

Government representative Jorge Rodríguez met with opposition leader Gerardo Blyde at Paris Peace Forum, marking first direct contact after talks froze in October 2021. France and international leaders including Argentina's Fernández and Colombia's Petro are positioning themselves as mediators for Venezuelan dialogue process.

  • Jorge Rodríguez (National Assembly president) met Gerardo Blyde (opposition leader) at Paris Peace Forum on November 11, 2022
  • Talks had been frozen since October 2021 after US extradited Venezuelan businessman Alex Saab
  • Formal conversations resumed in May 2022 after US eased some economic sanctions
  • Mexico City identified as next venue for formal negotiations

Venezuelan government and opposition delegations held their first meeting in Paris during the Peace Forum, signaling potential resumption of stalled negotiations on political dialogue and sanctions relief.

Jorge Rodríguez, who leads Venezuela's National Assembly, arrived in Paris on a Friday in November 2022 to sit across from Gerardo Blyde, the head of the opposition delegation, in what amounted to the first direct conversation between the two sides in over a year. The meeting took place at the Fifth Paris Peace Forum, held at the Palais Brongniart in the heart of the city, with the forum's focus that year trained on Latin America and its political futures.

The talks had frozen in October 2021, when the United States extradited Venezuelan businessman and diplomat Alex Saab from Cape Verde—a move that poisoned the negotiating atmosphere and sent both sides into their corners. But something had shifted. In May of that year, the government and a moderate faction of the opposition had quietly resumed formal conversations, sensing an opening. The Americans had begun to ease some of their economic pressure on the country, and with that small crack in the wall came the possibility of movement.

Rodríguez posted images from the forum to Twitter, framing the encounter as a vindication of his government's position. "We are convinced that Venezuela's path is dialogue, the suspension of all illegal sanctions, and respect for the Constitution," he wrote. The opposition's Blyde was there too, visible in the photographs, suggesting at least a willingness to be in the same room. French deputy Eleonore Caroit, present at the forum, tweeted that she had met with representatives from both the government and opposition, and that France could play a crucial role in the negotiation process.

The international stage was crowded with interested parties. Emmanuel Macron, the French president, had already signaled his intentions. In a separate meeting with Argentina's Alberto Fernández, Macron said the negotiations "must resume as soon as possible in Mexico." He emphasized that any process would need to begin with "a humanitarian agreement and political guarantees." Colombia's Gustavo Petro was there. Norway's foreign minister, Anniken Huitfeldt, attended. Brazil's newly elected president, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, participated by video.

Maduro himself had confirmed Rodríguez's participation the day before, speaking at the opening of Venezuela's International Book Fair. He told the crowd that Rodríguez was heading to Paris to meet with Macron and discuss peace. A few days earlier, a video had circulated showing Macron and Maduro in a brief hallway conversation at the UN climate conference in Egypt. Macron had expressed his desire to talk "a bit more" and to begin "bilateral work that is useful for the country and the region." Maduro responded that Rodríguez, a man he could speak with "in absolute confidence," would be at the Paris forum to carry that conversation forward.

What remained unclear was whether this Paris meeting would actually break the logjam or simply create the appearance of movement. The opposition delegation was described as the "more moderate" wing—a careful phrase that suggested the broader opposition remained fractured. The government's conditions were plain: lift the sanctions, respect the constitution, and talk. The opposition's conditions were less publicly articulated, but they centered on political guarantees and humanitarian relief. Mexico City was being positioned as the next venue, the place where formal negotiations would supposedly resume. Whether either side would actually show up with the flexibility to move remained an open question as the Paris forum concluded.

We are convinced that Venezuela's path is dialogue, the suspension of all illegal sanctions, and respect for the Constitution.
— Jorge Rodríguez, Venezuelan National Assembly president
The negotiations between both parties must resume as soon as possible in Mexico, and the process should begin with a humanitarian agreement and political guarantees.
— Emmanuel Macron, French president
The Hearth Conversation Another angle on the story
Inventor

Why does this meeting in Paris matter if the real negotiations are supposed to happen in Mexico?

Model

Because Paris is where the permission gets granted. When Macron sits down with both sides and international leaders watch, it signals that dialogue is acceptable again—that the world won't punish them for talking. Mexico is just the venue. Paris is the legitimacy.

Inventor

The opposition is described as "more moderate." What does that mean for the broader opposition movement?

Model

It means the opposition is split. There's a faction willing to negotiate with Maduro's government, and there's a faction that sees any negotiation as surrender. This meeting only includes the first group. The second group is watching from outside, probably angry.

Inventor

Maduro says Rodríguez can be trusted "with absolute confidence." Is that a sign the government is serious about dialogue?

Model

It's a sign Maduro is sending a message to the international mediators: my guy won't embarrass me, he'll represent my interests faithfully. It's not really about trust between the two sides. It's about control.

Inventor

Why did the talks freeze in the first place, and what's different now?

Model

They froze when the US extradited Alex Saab—a businessman close to Maduro. It felt like a betrayal, like the Americans were sabotaging the process. What's different now is the US has loosened some sanctions. That's the real change. Not the goodwill. The pressure.

Inventor

What does Venezuela actually want from these talks?

Model

The government wants sanctions lifted and international recognition restored. The opposition wants political guarantees—some assurance they won't be imprisoned or exiled for opposing Maduro. Those two things are hard to reconcile without a third party enforcing the deal.

Inventor

Is France really in a position to broker this?

Model

France can convene people and provide a neutral space. But the real power is in Washington and Caracas. France can facilitate, but it can't force either side to give ground they don't want to give.

Contact Us FAQ