Colombia's 2026 presidential race intensifies as candidates unveil running mates and campaign strategies

When the state loses territorial control, democracy itself weakens
Military figures backing Valencia cite the deterioration of state authority as their core concern about Colombia's security crisis.

Ex-VP Óscar Naranjo endorses centrist Sergio Fajardo as unifying leader capable of reconciliation, positioning him against polarizing extremes in Colombian politics. Four ex-Defense ministers and 32 retired generals sign letter backing right-wing candidate Paloma Valencia, citing security concerns over territorial control by illegal armed groups.

  • Four ex-defense ministers and 32 retired generals endorse Paloma Valencia
  • Iván Cepeda describes Antioquia as 'cradle of paramilitarism and narco-economics'
  • Electoral Council completes vote count in 19 departments and 8 peace constituencies
  • Centro Democrático wins 744,000+ Senate votes in Antioquia, up 74% from 2022
  • First-round presidential election scheduled for May 31, 2026

Colombia's 2026 presidential campaign intensifies as major political figures endorse candidates across the ideological spectrum. Ex-VP Naranjo backs centrist Fajardo while military figures support right-wing Valencia, amid controversy over Cepeda's Antioquia comments.

Colombia's presidential race is taking shape in the weeks before the May 31 first-round vote, and the endorsements are coming fast now—each one a signal about which way the political winds are blowing. The former vice president Óscar Naranjo has thrown his weight behind centrist Sergio Fajardo, calling him the leader capable of pulling the country back from its polarized edges. Naranjo's letter emphasized Fajardo's commitment to constitutional respect, democratic deliberation, and peaceful coexistence—a direct counter to what he sees as the extremism on both sides. Fajardo, who made a point of wearing a tie for the first time in years when he registered his candidacy, is running with biologist Edna Bonilla as his running mate. He's positioning himself as the antidote to chaos, framing his campaign around education reform and fighting corruption.

On the right, the endorsements are coming from the military establishment. Four former defense ministers—Marta Lucía Ramírez, Diego Molano, Guillermo Botero, and Juan Carlos Esguerra—along with 32 retired generals signed a letter backing Paloma Valencia, the right-wing Centro Democrático candidate. Their concern is explicit: they see illegal armed groups gaining territorial control and strengthening their numbers, and they believe Valencia has the capacity and will to defend the state's authority. Valencia is running with economist Juan Daniel Oviedo, a choice that has created ideological friction within the right. Oviedo supports same-sex adoption and recreational cannabis legalization; Valencia opposes both. Yet they've united around a shared fear: that a second term of Gustavo Petro's leftist government would slide from populism into authoritarianism.

The left's candidate, Senator Iván Cepeda, has found himself in a firestorm over comments he made about Antioquia, Colombia's second-most-populous department and a traditional stronghold of the right. In a speech attached to his government platform, Cepeda described Antioquia as the "cradle of paramilitarism, narco-economics, and state terrorism," and explicitly named former president Álvaro Uribe and his circle as central figures in that history. The backlash was immediate and fierce. Antioquia's governor, Andrés Julián Rendón, responded with a video saying the attacks were born of "hatred and ignorance." Uribe himself weighed in. Even President Petro, Cepeda's political godfather, felt compelled to defend him—though Petro's defense only amplified the controversy, as he doubled down on the historical facts about paramilitarism's origins in the region. Cepeda later issued a statement saying his words were being distorted, that he had praised Antioquia's entrepreneurial spirit and economic contributions even as he condemned its violent past. The damage, though, was done.

Meanwhile, the National Electoral Council announced it has completed the vote count in 19 departments and eight special peace-building constituencies. The council's president, Cristian Quiroz, called the process transparent and quick, with minimal complaints. The scrutiny of Senate elections is expected to begin soon, though Quiroz declined to estimate when the final count would be finished. In Antioquia itself, the Centro Democrático consolidated its dominance: it won more than 744,000 Senate votes—a 74 percent increase from 2022—and captured seven of the department's seventeen House seats. Yet the Pacto Histórico, Petro's movement, emerged as the second force in the chamber with three seats, a sign of leftward movement even in the right's heartland.

Other shifts are reshaping the race. Luis Carlos Reyes, the former commerce minister known as "Mr. Taxes," withdrew as Mauricio Lizcano's running mate due to complications in his wife's pregnancy. Lizcano, running as an independent, said he understood the decision and would announce a replacement. The centrist Claudia López chose Leonardo Huerta as her vice-presidential running mate. And in a move that drew criticism from the left, the small New Liberal Party, led by Juan Manuel Galán, endorsed Valencia—a choice that prompted accusations of betraying the party's liberal heritage, with former senator Roy Barreras invoking the memory of Galán's assassinated father, Luis Carlos Galán, who stood against the right.

President Petro has been unusually active in the campaign, defending Cepeda and attacking Valencia's security policies, despite rules that prohibit sitting presidents from campaigning. When criticized for this, Petro responded that he has the right to answer attacks on his government. He also made a homophobic comment about Oviedo, calling him and his supporters "feathers and sequins," a remark that drew a sharp rebuke from the vice-presidential candidate himself. The European Union's election observation mission reported that state media had favored Petro and his movement while giving limited and often negative coverage to the opposition—a finding Petro dismissed as cynical. The campaign is still four months away, but the battle lines are already drawn, and the intensity is only rising.

The commitment to our country, respect for difference, and distance from polarizing extremes point to Fajardo as the leader capable of reconciling and uniting us around constitutional respect, peace, and democratic deliberation.
— Former Vice President Óscar Naranjo, in his endorsement letter
The attacks on our region are the product of hatred and ignorance, of resentment and baseness. In Antioquia we are immune to the poison they spill.
— Antioquia Governor Andrés Julián Rendón, responding to Cepeda
A Conversa do Hearth Outra perspectiva sobre a história
Inventor

Why does Naranjo's endorsement of Fajardo matter so much? He's not running himself.

Model

Because Naranjo spent decades in security and intelligence. When he says Fajardo can reconcile the country, he's signaling to centrists and moderate conservatives that there's a third way—that you don't have to choose between Petro's left and Uribe's right. That's powerful.

Inventor

And the military letter backing Valencia—is that just about security, or is it political?

Model

It's both. Yes, they're genuinely worried about armed groups. But the letter is also a message: the military establishment sees Valencia as their candidate. That carries weight in a country where the armed forces have always mattered.

Inventor

Cepeda's comments about Antioquia seem historically accurate, though. Why the uproar?

Model

Because accuracy doesn't matter when you're running for president in a region you just insulted. He named the place as a cradle of paramilitarism and narco-trafficking. That's true, but it's also a region of millions of people who see themselves differently—as hardworking, entrepreneurial. He stepped on a nerve.

Inventor

Petro defending him only made it worse, didn't it?

Model

Exactly. Petro should have stayed quiet. Instead, he doubled down on the historical critique, which read as him saying Antioquia deserved the criticism. That's not how you win a region.

Inventor

What about Valencia and Oviedo—can that ticket actually hold together?

Model

For now, yes, because they agree on what they're against: Petro. But if they win, those ideological differences will explode. Oviedo wants to legalize cannabis; Valencia doesn't. He supports gay adoption; she doesn't. They're united by fear, not vision.

Quer a matéria completa? Leia o original em El País ↗
Fale Conosco FAQ