Liberty Bell Bay smelter seeks buyer as funding window closes, union pushes Canberra

Approximately 175 workers face redundancy or unpaid leave; pay runs out May 19 without buyer secured or additional funding.
Workers shouldn't wake up wondering if their job survives until payday
The union's argument for why emergency loans aren't enough to solve the smelter's crisis.

On the edge of Tasmania's industrial north, the fate of 175 workers hangs in the balance as the window for purchasing the Liberty Bell Bay manganese smelter has closed without a confirmed buyer. The collapse of parent company GFG Alliance set in motion a chain of emergency measures — a $3 million government loan, union delegations to Canberra, and a hard deadline of May 19 — each one a temporary stay against a deeper reckoning with industrial fragility and the limits of public rescue. What unfolds here is a story older than any single smelter: the moment when global finance, local livelihoods, and political will converge, and the question becomes not merely who will buy a facility, but who bears responsibility for the people inside it.

  • With the non-binding offer window now closed and no buyer confirmed, roughly 175 workers face redundancy or unpaid leave when their last government-funded paycheck runs out on May 19.
  • The smelter's collapse traces to GFG Alliance's failure, after which US private equity firm White Oak seized control and administrators EY delivered an ultimatum that gutted the workforce overnight.
  • A joint state-federal emergency loan of $3 million bought three weeks of wages — a stopgap the union describes as a dangerous hand-to-mouth approach that leaves workers waking each morning uncertain of their futures.
  • Right-to-information documents reveal White Oak's chairman was in contact with Tasmania's Resources Minister months before the formal collapse, raising questions about what scenarios — including administration and sale — were discussed behind closed doors.
  • A legal expert notes a troubling gap: the government gave GFG $20 million to purchase ore and restart production, yet even after the ore arrived, the smelter remained idle — suggesting the problems ran far deeper than supply.
  • The union's delegation to Canberra now represents the workers' clearest remaining path, pressing for sustained government commitment rather than crisis-by-crisis funding as the sale process continues.

The deadline for offers to buy Tasmania's only manganese smelter has passed, and for the roughly 175 workers at Liberty Bell Bay, the clock is now running down to May 19 — the date their wages stop unless a buyer emerges or more government money arrives.

The crisis began when parent company GFG Alliance, part of Sanjeev Gupta's industrial empire, collapsed. US private equity firm White Oak, the secured lender, seized control and brought in EY as administrators in late March. EY quickly delivered an ultimatum: most of the 216-strong workforce would face unpaid leave or redundancy. State and federal governments responded with a $3 million emergency loan — enough to cover three weeks of wages, but nothing more.

The Australian Workers' Union's assistant national secretary, Chris Donovan, was blunt about the union's frustration. Workers shouldn't have to wonder each morning whether their jobs will survive to the next payday. The union is pushing for longer-term government commitment, not a cycle of last-minute interventions. Tasmania's Resources Minister Felix Ellis acknowledged the obvious: the best outcome is a buyer willing to invest in both the smelter and the community around it.

Documents obtained under right-to-information laws complicate the picture. White Oak's chairman Tom Otte had been corresponding with Ellis as far back as August last year — months before the formal collapse — pressing for urgent meetings and discussing scenarios for returning the smelter to profitability. The day after one such meeting was scheduled, the government announced a $20 million loan to GFG to purchase ore and restart production. Ellis has declined to elaborate on what specific proposals were discussed, citing commercial confidentiality.

Insolvency law expert Jason Harris noted that government engagement with a secured lender over a facility of this significance is not unusual — but the sequence of events raises questions. GFG had claimed it couldn't restart without ore; the government provided $20 million to solve that. Yet the smelter still didn't restart, suggesting deeper structural problems. What the correspondence makes clear, Harris observed, is that White Oak wanted assurance the government would keep supporting the business if the firm took it over.

By January, the state government had determined GFG defaulted on its loan and appointed Deloitte as receivers over the ore stockpile. Now, with the offer window closed and May 19 approaching fast, the union's push in Canberra is the workers' last clear chance — a bid to secure the funding that might keep Liberty Bell Bay alive long enough for a buyer to step forward.

The deadline for offers to buy Tasmania's only manganese smelter has passed, and the clock is ticking for the hundreds of workers who depend on it. Liberty Bell Bay, in the state's north, closed its non-binding offer window last week as a union delegation traveled to Canberra to plead for more government money. Without it, roughly 175 of the facility's 216 workers will see their paychecks stop on May 19.

The smelter's collapse traces back to last year, when its parent company, Sanjeev Gupta's GFG Alliance, went under. The secured lender White Oak, a US-based private equity firm, seized control and brought in EY as administrators in late March. Within weeks, EY delivered an ultimatum: most workers would either take unpaid leave or face redundancy. The state and federal governments responded with an emergency $3 million loan package, enough to keep wages flowing for three more weeks while a buyer was sought. It was a stopgap, not a solution.

Chris Donovan, assistant national secretary of the Australian Workers' Union, made clear the union's frustration with this hand-to-mouth approach. Workers shouldn't have to wake up each day wondering if their job would survive until the next payday, he said. The union wants the government to commit to longer-term support, not just bridge the gap between one pay cycle and the next. Tasmania's Resources Minister Felix Ellis acknowledged that the best outcome would be finding a buyer willing to invest in the smelter's future and the community that depends on it.

What emerges from documents obtained under Tasmania's right-to-information laws is a more complex picture of how the crisis unfolded. White Oak's chairman, Tom Otte, based in North Carolina, began corresponding with Ellis in August of last year, months before the formal collapse. In his emails, Otte indicated that White Oak had been discussing various scenarios with Tasmanian officials about how the firm could help support the smelter's operations and return it to profitability. He pressed for an urgent meeting, citing the financial pressures facing the business. Ellis agreed to meet on August 25. The day after that meeting was scheduled, the minister announced that GFG Alliance would receive a $20 million government loan to purchase ore and restart production. Four days later, Ellis requested a briefing ahead of his meeting with Otte, framing it as a search for "a mutually agreeable solution."

When asked what scenarios White Oak and EY had proposed, and whether the appointment of administrators and sale of the smelter were discussed, Ellis declined to elaborate. He said only that the government had been "actively engaged" with Liberty Bell Bay and various stakeholders "for an extended period," and that the commercial and confidential nature of the discussions made it inappropriate to comment on individual proposals. EY also declined to comment.

Jason Harris, a corporate and insolvency law expert at the University of Sydney, said it was not unusual for a state government to meet with a secured lender in such circumstances. A smelter of Liberty Bell Bay's significance would naturally draw government attention given its economic and employment implications. But Harris noted something telling in the sequence of events: GFG had claimed it couldn't restart operations because it lacked ore due to supply problems. The government provided $20 million to solve that problem. Yet even after the ore arrived, the smelter still didn't restart. "It would seem that the business had other problems, not simply the lack of ore," Harris said. What the correspondence revealed, he added, was that White Oak—the major secured creditor—clearly wanted assurance that the government would continue supporting the business if the firm ended up taking it over.

In January, the state government determined that GFG had defaulted on its loan and appointed Deloitte as receivers to take control of the ore stockpile. Both EY and Deloitte declined to comment. Now, with the offer window closed and May 19 approaching, the union's push in Canberra represents the workers' last clear chance to secure the funding that might keep the smelter alive long enough for a buyer to emerge. Without it, the redundancies will begin.

Workers should not have to spend every day wondering whether their jobs will still exist by the next payday
— Chris Donovan, Australian Workers' Union Assistant National Secretary
The best hope for the workforce at Liberty Bell Bay is that there is a buyer willing to invest in the future of that site and the future of the community
— Felix Ellis, Tasmania's Resources Minister
La Conversación del Hearth Otra perspectiva de la historia
Inventor

Why does a single smelter in Tasmania matter enough for the federal government to get involved?

Model

Because it's the only manganese smelter in Australia. If it closes, the country loses that production capacity entirely. And it's not abstract—175 people lose their jobs in a region that doesn't have many alternatives.

Inventor

The government already gave $20 million to GFG last year. Why didn't that work?

Model

That's the question that keeps surfacing. The money was supposed to let them buy ore and restart. The ore arrived, but they still didn't restart. It suggests the ore shortage was never really the core problem.

Inventor

So what was the real problem?

Model

The documents don't say explicitly. But White Oak's emails suggest they were worried about the smelter's viability all along. They wanted government assurances before they took over. That tells you they saw deeper structural issues.

Inventor

What does the union actually want now?

Model

They want the government to commit to sustained funding, not just three-week emergency loans. They're saying workers shouldn't live in constant fear of redundancy notices.

Inventor

Is there any chance a buyer actually emerges?

Model

That's the whole gamble. The offer window closed, so there are potential buyers in the mix. But whether any of them will actually commit money to restart a smelter that's already failed once—that's uncertain.

Inventor

What happens if no buyer comes forward by May 19?

Model

The emergency loan runs out. Without more government money or a buyer, the redundancies begin. That's when the real economic damage hits the community.

Contáctanos FAQ