US military aircraft land in Caracas as Venezuela navigates new Washington ties

January 2026 US military operations resulted in approximately 100 deaths including 32 Cuban agents; current exercise represents military presence without reported casualties.
We have been in a state of war since the moment they bombed us
A university professor expresses the lingering trauma and resistance to American military presence in Caracas.

Two Bell Boeing MV-22B Osprey aircraft landed at the US embassy with General Francis Donovan, conducting bilateral talks and military response exercises amid restored US-Venezuela relations. Caracas residents watched with curiosity rather than fear, contrasting sharply with January's bombing campaign that killed nearly 100 people including 32 Cuban agents.

  • Two Bell Boeing MV-22B Osprey helicopters landed at the US embassy in Caracas on May 23, 2026
  • General Francis Donovan, commander of US Southern Command, conducted bilateral talks and observed a joint military exercise
  • January 2026 bombing campaign killed nearly 100 people, including 32 Cuban military advisors
  • Venezuela restored diplomatic relations with the US on March 5, 2026, after seven years of rupture
  • Interim President Delcy Rodríguez has opened oil and mineral extraction laws to foreign investment under US pressure

US military helicopters landed at the American embassy in Caracas for a joint exercise, marking a dramatic shift in US-Venezuela relations following Maduro's capture in January and the restoration of diplomatic ties in March.

Augusto Pérez stood on a lookout in eastern Caracas on Saturday morning, watching with visible emotion as two American military helicopters descended toward the United States embassy compound. He was not alone. Dozens of residents held up their phones to record the arrival of the Bell Boeing MV-22B Osprey aircraft, their rotors churning the air above the diplomatic quarter. For Pérez, a seventy-year-old engineer, the moment carried weight—nearly five months had passed since American forces had stormed into Venezuela and captured President Nicolás Maduro in a raid that had left the city reeling.

The helicopters carried General Francis Donovan, commander of U.S. Southern Command, on his second official visit to the country since the January operation. According to the Southern Command's statement, Donovan spent the day in bilateral talks with interim government leaders, met with embassy staff, and observed what officials called a military response exercise conducted by a joint Venezuelan-American force. The aircraft touched down in the embassy parking lot around 10:30 in the morning local time, kicking up dust and leaves as they landed.

What struck observers most was the absence of fear. In January, when American bombers had struck Caracas during Maduro's capture, the city had erupted in panic. Nearly one hundred people had died in those strikes, including thirty-two Cuban military advisors. The bombing had been sudden, overwhelming, a demonstration of force that left scars across the capital. But this Saturday landing was different. Franco Di Prada, a resident of the area, said he had lived fifty-six years without witnessing anything like it. He felt curiosity, he admitted, and doubt—but not terror. Oscar García, a sixty-year-old accountant who also watched the helicopters arrive, described the experience as interesting and said it had left him feeling calm.

The exercise itself represented a dramatic reversal in a relationship that had been frozen for two decades. Hugo Chávez had severed military ties with Washington in 2005, expelling American officers and pivoting Venezuela's foreign policy toward Russia, Cuba, and Iran. For the next two decades, the country had existed in a state of deep antagonism toward the United States. But in March, just two months after Maduro's capture, the interim government led by President Delcy Rodríguez had restored diplomatic relations with Washington for the first time in seven years. Rodríguez had moved quickly to reshape Venezuela's economic framework, opening new laws governing oil and mineral extraction to foreign investment—moves that bore the clear imprint of American pressure.

Not everyone in Caracas welcomed the military exercise. On the opposite side of the city, a small group of chavista activists had gathered to protest. They held a Venezuelan flag bearing the words "No to Yankee Simulation." Fita González, a twenty-eight-year-old interpreter, acknowledged the contradiction in her government's position. She opposed American military interference, she said, but understood why Caracas had authorized the exercise. "Unfortunately, our government is under threat," she explained. "We cannot forget that they kidnapped our president." Inés Vivas, a university professor of sixty-nine, was less forgiving. She saw the military presence as an extension of the bombing campaign itself. "We have been in a state of war since the moment they bombed us," she said.

The exercise highlighted the precarious position in which Venezuela now found itself. The interim government, governing under intense pressure from Washington, had chosen to cooperate with American military operations on Venezuelan soil. The Southern Command's statement made clear what Washington expected from this new arrangement: a Venezuela that was "free, secure, and prosperous"—language that masked the fundamental reality of the moment. The country that had once defined itself through resistance to American power was now hosting American soldiers in its capital, conducting joint military exercises, and rewriting its laws to attract American investment. The helicopters that landed on Saturday morning were not just aircraft. They were a symbol of a nation in transition, caught between its past and an uncertain future.

Unfortunately, our government is under threat. We cannot forget that they kidnapped our president.
— Fita González, interpreter, on why Venezuela authorized the military exercise despite opposing American interference
We have been in a state of war since the moment they bombed us.
— Inés Vivas, university professor, on the continued threat posed by American military presence
La Conversación del Hearth Otra perspectiva de la historia
Inventor

Why did people react so differently to these helicopters than they did to the bombing in January?

Model

Because this time, the helicopters weren't dropping ordnance. They were landing. There's a difference between violence and presence, even if presence can feel like a threat. The residents who watched had lived through the panic of January—nearly a hundred dead, the city in shock. This was controlled, announced, almost ceremonial. Some people felt relief at that control. Others felt something closer to resignation.

Inventor

The interim government authorized this exercise. But there were protesters. How does that tension resolve?

Model

It doesn't, not yet. The government is caught between two pressures—Washington on one side, demanding reforms and military cooperation, and the chavista base on the other, seeing American soldiers as occupiers. The government chose Washington. That choice buys them legitimacy with the new power, but it costs them legitimacy with people who remember what came before.

Inventor

What changed between 2005 and now?

Model

Hugo Chávez threw out the Americans and turned toward Russia and Cuba. That lasted twenty years. But Maduro's capture broke something. It showed that resistance to American power had limits. The interim government decided to stop resisting and start negotiating. The helicopters landing are what that negotiation looks like in practice.

Inventor

Is this stable?

Model

No. You have people like Inés Vivas saying Venezuela is still at war. You have a government that's governing under American pressure. You have economic reforms being imposed from outside. That's not a stable arrangement. It's a transition, and transitions are fragile.

Quieres la nota completa? Lee el original en UOL Notícias ↗
Contáctanos FAQ